She is actively avoiding condemning them, making it sound like it's not an entire party putting us where we are.
I mean, all the Supreme Court did was open the door for states to make their own laws.
I'm not saying that I agree with SCOTUS' decision, or that they are blameless. But it's the state lawmakers who are choosing what to do with their newfound freedoms, and ultimately it's the voting population of the states who empower those lawmakers.
Of course gerrymandering and Big Money make it much harder than it should be for voters to have any influence. But still, you can't put all the blame on one party's politicians; the voters of the other party have to do their part if they want to be represented.
Here's another read.
Segments of the American population are interested in taking rights away from other Americans, or making all Americans play by their own personally held rules. The point of government is to be the arbitrator of rights. And Conservative Republicans have historically been in favor of "smaller government" so it can't be that arbiter. So it can't tell them do to things like not dump their waste in public water ways, discriminate against people in housing, jobs, benefits, voting access.....
Saying that "oh well states and the people that vote them in power just get to choose now" essentially says you're cool with all those things, because people's right to choose matters more than basic decency, actual freedom or equality.
I'm not coming after you specifically. But I would think real hard about what you're saying. Because the worst examples will be made manifest by decisions like these, and future ones they're planning to make.
I mean, deciding that states can just invalidate elections because they don't like the results? How is that a net benefit to American society or democracy? The idea that people will eventually "vote out the bad guys" is fucking laughable and has been for the last 8 years.