So ... despite RattyB being blatant scum, we're all cool with just shortening the day instead of taking the available time to figure out who would be scum past RattyB? I mean, I suppose that's one way of doing it, but it just seems awfully weird how everyone is just all "ehh, fuck it, shorten, we found scum, who cares about the other two?"
y'all sunsabitches is confusing me.
You spoke my thoughts as if I had an inner American person in my mind :O
Tiruing[/b{ you never said what your tracker booped me as doing.
I...sorta did
Ok, not directly, but indirectly. (See: My read on you)
This is the part where I 'nodded' at doll's statement :O And why I adjusted him in my latest post--because it reflects exactly what I got on you.
...You gone nowhere O:
But I'm still curious as to why doll did what he did.
Tiruin[/b]
I asked you to tell me where to vote and you did.
>_>
<.<
See, now this is where the wittiness gets me--I didn't get what you mean when I now get that you got that I got a something with what or how I did my vote I:
Hmff.
BUT, in the situation wherein Ratty isn't actually scum--denoting a
three person team, we only have the grunt being taken here--but if non-scum, . . .I really can't find what
can actually block the Tracking Device other than killing the person tracking. Anti-tech devices do inform me (ie I guess it'd let them go "Oh what's this on me, shoo whatever this is"), Alien stuffs don't seemingly affect me as I don't night action (Unless I'm scum--investigative tracking device scientists automatically spend the night not going out or stuff, due to automatically working on a new device), and I may be under the impression that the scumteam may have less communication than first out, and/or Ratty posted before checking if he is scum (which given NOBODY ELSE saying stuff about IO, seems statistically correct)
One reason I targeted Ratty was his inconspicuousness from D1 (Shakerag because he was :V. And that I had somewhat of a GOOD read on him but wanted to be sure. That's as far as the emoticon was concerned as I thought I could shift but then nope-day-action).
Also oppose shorten (Like wow is this weird that once 'at least two people say :I', then the shortening happens o_O)
That was what led me to lightly nudge doll or wubbywubs. I do feel like there's some bussing here given a rather transparent foundation of RattyB, so he can play a scapegoat for some folks around though.
Especially given the very...brevity-filled shorten train. This is strange. o_O
Also I may employ in the future a buddy-system of PMing so to ensure that my info is relayed to at least #_of_dopps left +2.
And I'm also partly wary given that this may be a test setup of roles (randomly given but yeah) given the tad bit of flavor I read in the OP.
I'll throw in a RattyB vote, obviously. Things happened quickly while I was at work, but I'm not complaining because ya'll found scum.
Regarding things earlier: I have no relevant night action information to share.
Also, shorten.
What about relevant...other people action you'd like to pursue today :V
It's like man, everyone has a supercool role and can't wait for night I:
They do?
Yes. Every Extend removes a shorten--and if anyone cancels their extend/shorten, the remaining will still count as a vote either way. However one opposing an extend or shorten just detracts from the # given.
[...]
EBWOP:Why did you visit Shakerag? Why did you think this information was useful to reveal to the town?
This can be disregarded, I missed the Tiruin post earlier.
Tiruin: Why did you feel you had to force a claim out of doll? Your read on him was not incriminating. At the very least you could have just asked him who he visited rather than what he did.
I...didn't, actually, aim to force a claim. I worded it in such a way because usually the way I've seen others answer that is to ask a following question in turn--my read on him was NOT incriminating until after he would've posted his answer (same with wubbydubs, but he somehow missed my post?). Said read was...pretty much after me and doll talked in those tiny walls of text there :O
And yes--'what he did' could be parsed both as who he visited or otherwise; I aimed to word it as a general question that would align with one's own perspective of thinking, meaning that when read by the person involved, they'd have their
own idea of their own context instead of a pre-defined or leading one O:
Hence why I noted it earlier as an 'innocuous' question.
Shorten. Well, RattyB being scum changes around my picks for scum.
May I ask who them picks are o_O
shrug
Shorten is fine with me too.
May I ask your thoughts of essence for the day?
Also, see? Was that so tough, Tiruin? All I wanted was a little activity. Now we can go back to being nice to each other.
Or at least I can assume you're Town. You can assume whatever you like about me. But, I'll admit, I'm (mostly) harmless.
=I
I believe you but I am still stinging from the snark D:
But yeah--thoughts please! Alongside why the shorten with...lacking detail ahead? I mean before I caught up to Shakerag's post (right above mine), it struck me as...strange in a way to see people shorten all in the span of my workday. Or 8 hours.
[...]
If you want, you can bot me, but I'm just letting you know, there's a reason I've been stupidly aggressive this game, and the hint is I like my sleep at night. Or maybe I don't, and I'm a liar. Who knows?
Also, heads up, doll has claimed exactly what he claimed to me.
I refuse to claim other than the breadcrumb I've just given, but I only do so for the benefit of the Town. doll will confirm that it's best not to know these things.
Bot?
Also stupidly aggressive seems more snarky, and when I've noticed you're like that, it's usually out of good intent but with that mysteriousness I still fail to fathom I:
And then webadict was the hiveminds [/or some secret role left unnoted in the role list, or some really grumpy dude like a paranoid veteran; that'd be awesome though because I'll probably be the only person to be able to boop your nose]