Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 8

Author Topic: MMORPGs?  (Read 8844 times)

Arbinire

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: MMORPGs?
« Reply #60 on: October 15, 2016, 09:57:49 am »

I'd love to have the MUD experience again as well, but with some of the more modern MMO aspects such as crafting(but done in a logical and sensible way), in a setting that's recognizable.  That said though MUDs had their failings too(ranged combat).

Like, I wont harp on the "collect 100 teeth from the sugar addicted near toothless mobs over there" quests because realistically that's always going to be around, and has been since the first D&D session of "go into dungeon and get the king his macguffin!".  I guess the best way of putting it is that I'd like an MMO that felt more like a world you're character is living in, instead of a park you're playing Ninja Turtles and Barbies in.
Logged

Starver

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: MMORPGs?
« Reply #61 on: October 15, 2016, 11:16:46 am »

I'd love to have the MUD experience again as well, but with some of the more modern MMO aspects such as crafting(but done in a logical and sensible way), in a setting that's recognizable.
One approach... (Dig down for varying handling.  Although for custom armour, etc, you don't make it yourself but go to one or other of the NPCs.)
Quote
That said though MUDs had their failings too(ranged combat).
That (across multi-rooms, at least) and horse(/camel/boat)-riding was always a bit lacking, I admit, but still so many other goodies...  ;)

Quote

Like, I wont harp on the "collect 100 teeth from the sugar addicted near toothless mobs over there" quests
Not much of that, places I like (Ok, so things like "behead 150,000 enemies" was added to DW fairly recently, but solely grinding that isn't that worthwhile), except of course for this game...  ;)
Logged

Cthulhu

  • Bay Watcher
  • A squid
    • View Profile
Re: MMORPGs?
« Reply #62 on: October 15, 2016, 02:25:38 pm »

Imy actually getting back into wow.  The changes have done a ton to make the game more community -oriented.  Everything's normalized so you don't fuck your friend over by playing while hes offline, pvp stats are normalized based on ilevel so there's no more getting reamed if you want to pvp at x7 or below in a bracket but you still have an advantage for gear
Logged
Shoes...

nenjin

  • Bay Watcher
  • Inscrubtable Exhortations of the Soul
    • View Profile
Re: MMORPGs?
« Reply #63 on: October 15, 2016, 03:28:20 pm »

For me:

1. Lower barrier to entry. Most games understand this now. Most understand that you've got to hook your player within the first couple hours if you want to have a chance at keeping them. Again, WoW really mastered this. I remember going from the last MMO I'd played to WoW (which I think was Final Fantasy Online), I was stunned by the amount of shit that felt like it was just handed to me. Levels, gear, quests, abilities, money, all within minutes. There was so much going on that between that and WoW's 10 ton visuals (I started as a Night Elf), reading the quests to see why I was actually doing all this seemed pointless.

2. A preference for actual live zones versus instances. This is a HUGE reason why community took a hit in more recent MMOs. The original concept of MMOs was thousands of players sharing the same space, literally. Then lessons were learned about the performance hit that creates, how the infrastructure of truly popular games can't handle millions of players in the same space simultaneously and how people generally turn into dicks given enough time and opportunity. When everyone was fresh to MMOs, they had to feel their way around. They had to talk to people. They had to ask for help. A lot of game knowledge was stored in player's heads, not in robust wikis. But after the downsides of large shared spaces were recognizing, instancing happened. The social aspect became more and more abstracted away for the sake of performance and clean, repeatable experiences. (Doing a dungeon run in EQ was an utterly different experience than doing one in WoW.) Queues were created to handle player loads and make sure everyone got a group to so no one was left LFGing their life away. But you don't need to know anyone beyond whether they suck at their class when it comes to queues. They might as well be an NPC for all you actually need to know them. I miss the old days of 20 or 30 players in the same dungeon trying to make their thing happen. It's what made game worlds feel truly dynamic to me. (Even though it made it really difficult to progress at all and lead to preposterous behaviors like camping the same group of monster spawns all night instead of actually progressing through the dungeon.) Still, every day felt like its own adventure because every day brought different people and different things happening, and that was almost enough to make up for it being way harder to complete anything or see it through. You were Chasing The Dragon.

3. Getting away from the WoW model, in general. In some ways this means getting away from a lot of the conveniences it introduced. A new way of doing gear, no more common/uncommon/rare/unique/epic/super epic with a nice color coded system. Combat mechanics that are actually original. Not doing the "Rolodex of Quests" per zone. Not having cleanly laid out, easily identifiable quest givers with brainless quests so you can meet the level threshold for your zone and then progress on. I really want loot that I value for it individual qualities and not just because it has 35 more attack, 2.5% more crit, and 13% more crit damage. Every fucking game I play today uses these rules it seems like and it creates a sense of boredom for what is supposed to be the biggest carrot in these games. I want gear that I'll actually keep with me for a while, not gear that is literally so replaceable I can't even remember the name of it or what it does without going into my inventory. Seriously, we're not kids anymore. We don't need to be stimulated every 2 minutes with a new loot drop to keep us interested if the game itself is actually enough to keep our attention.

4. Respect for my time. That kind of goes along with #3. So much of WoW set up busy work that you had to get through to do anything interesting. Oh please farm 40,000 rep to buy this key so you can go to this dungeon. Oh please do three different difficulties of this dungeon before it's complete. It is a game company's necessity to keep you paying your monthly fee, or buying microtransactions and game cash, that has taken the original model of grinding and expanded into this elaborate, never ending cycle of trivial tasks meant to fill up our day. Why create new and truly interesting content when it's far more cost effective to just take the same thing you had before, tweak a couple settings and just invent a new tier of busy work to occupy a person's day, where there is no real mystery because there's nothing really new other than higher level monsters and better loot. You're not so much Chasing The Dragon as Holding On To The Dragon's Tail While It Slowly Drags You Through The Game.

5. Real danger in everyday gameplay. I'm advocating for a return to real punishments in MMOs. That may be in conflict with #4. But when you trivially die and respawn all you're left with is the time you've lost and the knowledge you've gained, and I've done enough raiding to know that knowledge alone can't sustain interest when you still can't do anything with it. Real penalties that makes adventuring dangerous is what gives a world character and spice. It's what invests those mobs with personalities due to the makeup, instead of just making them a collection of stats, AI pathing behaviors and loot tables. We have become so risk averse in MMOs due to how we value our time and how we just desperately want to progress that we've come to accept a tepid gruel of same-y trivial content spoon fed to us for the vast majority of the game. Only when you start raiding does shit really matter, because raids are truly designed to be challenging. Lots of people are like "oh if you want danger play PvP. PvE is for my safe, bored solo farming." Plenty of people enjoy SP games with real element of danger to it. MMOs became to afraid to alienate their customer base to try that anymore, and it's why I can't take a lot of them seriously.

6. This may sum up or contain all the other points. Make it about the journey, not the goal. Thanks to WoW's loot system and idea about linear progression, we no longer really give a shit about what we're doing, we only care about what it gets us. It's part of the reason the social aspect died, it was relegated to "Can you help me achieve this thing I want? No? Then I don't need to talk to you." Who has time to talk to people or get to know them when the next quest step can be sprinted to in 30 seconds, or the next dungeon mob should be pulled as soon as the first is dead. The quests that get you to the "big moment" should provoke thought, challenging your skills and encourage exploration. If all we care about is loot and whether or not we're keyed to go on to the next thing, then half of what makes up an MMO game just feels like busy work we don't pay attention to. It cheapens the lore, it cheapens the experience and it makes your players jaded about future content because they expect it to be more of the same, just with a different coat of paint.

Here is I think my real problem, something I associate with writing ultimately: how gameplay is designed follows the formula first and foremost and the ideas that underpin it come second.

For example: mmo devs are about to create a new zone. Immediately they apply the formula. It has to be this big, have this many dungeons, this many cities/rest points and hook up to these different pre-existing gameplay systems like factions. Ok, we've plotted these hard numbers. Now what is the zone actually about? Well, let's make it a fire themed one. Ok, so what lives there? Well it's fire so.....dragons obviously. Why are there actually dragons in this zone? (Lore writers spend a while concocting a backstory for dragons in this world.) Ok so what are the dungeons about? Well obviously there's dragons in the zone so....dragon dungeons! (Lore writers spend time concocting an explanation for why there is a giant castle on top of a volcano where the Dragon King lives and why you should kill him.) Oh we need a lot of subfactions to populate the zone and hand out quests. (Lore writers come up with a dozen minor groups that have varying reasons for existing, but mostly so you have someone to give you quests and sell you things.)

And on and on and on.

Players recognize this shit almost the moment they see it because the game has been training them to expect it. For me, as a player, that pretty much instantaneously steals the thunder of whatever exists in this zone, because I know its existence probably isn't a flash of creativity or awesomeness from a game designer, but a work-a-day requirement to create a thing and fill it with stuff, and the easiest way to do that is to NOT have to re-invent the wheel every time, which a good formula facilitates. But by making their work easier and content creation more seamless, it loses that creative vital spark which makes something truly special, weird, outstanding or interesting. It's a pipeline of content creation so everything needs to have the same general shape so it doesn't get stuck in the pipeline.

There are examples of this in WoW: Kharazan was great. It was new and different than other raid dungeons before it. A great combination of layout, design, new mechanics, adjusted raid mechanics, aesthetic and details. It's awesome in a way Dead Mines is awesome for the love you can feel went into it. Or the Scarlet Monastery. Or Stratholme. But compare and contrast...fuck, the dozens and dozens of dungeons you vaguely remember, whose names you don't give a shit about because their awesomeness and creativity didn't sear itself into your gamer's brain. A lot of the Burning Crusade dungeons are like this to me.

Where are the zones you can't explain? That don't fit into the formula? That exist because they're cool and not just because it's an option for 20-30 leveling? I remember in EQ one zone was just a mansion. A big haunted spooky mansion, where each part of the mansion was laid out as its own area with its own monsters and stuff (Estate of Unrest.) It was offbeat in a game that was largely comprised of open areas with a smattering of dungeons and NPCs around. Or a zone that was nothing but a mountain pass loaded with enemies, with a town at one end and the zone exit at the other, and the town was regularly "under attack" because of PCs training monsters into it as they passed through (Highhold Pass.) These places had character. Their very design was their character and everything else built on that. In WoW HHP would be jam packed with vendors, faction reps, quest vendors, 3 dungeons and miles of useless canyon for the express purpose of not seeming to small compared to other zones, and waves of monsters would regularly spawn just to get slaughtered on the front rank of town defenders so players would see it as "epic" that there is this constant (and completely trivial to gameplay) conflict going on. I'm not going to say that Everquest didn't have plenty of clunker zones that were uninspired, too big with nothing in them, etc....but its high notes were always so much sweeter than WoW's. I'd say the only thing WoW does that is undeniably better is interesting raids, because it seems like that's where people get actual time to think and create interesting stuff. EQ had some cool raids for sure, mostly due to the level design, but the fights aren't as intricate in their details and stages as WoW raids eventually became.

In the end I just want the craftsmenship of ideas and content to be a thing again, not just how many hours an MMO can occupy you or how many "quests" it offers. It having a Diablo-like loot system should not be a selling point. Variety, surprises, a formula for design that knows how to keep itself hidden, and a game that actually asks me to think about how to play it are all what are stopping me from getting back into or trying a new MMO. In a way I think new MMOs are basically just fan service. WoW created a sustainable, constantly sellable model for MMO design that everyone picks up and adapts to their own particular genre or IP. The D&D MMO, the LotR MMO, the Marvel MMO, the FPS MMO, the Conan MMO, on and on. In a way WoW is responsible for making all these games even possible because everyone who made them already had an idea what to do going in and that made them a lot easier to be greenlighted by publishers because it was a model that had already succeeded big time for Blizzard. And yet, many of these games are no longer around because they couldn't go the distance. And those that tried to be different I suppose just weren't awesome enough to survive where Blizzard is still King of MMOs.
« Last Edit: October 15, 2016, 04:04:41 pm by nenjin »
Logged
Cautivo del Milagro seamos, Penitente.
Quote from: Viktor Frankl
When we are no longer able to change a situation, we are challenged to change ourselves.
Quote from: Sindain
Its kinda silly to complain that a friendly NPC isn't a well designed boss fight.
Quote from: Eric Blank
How will I cheese now assholes?
Quote from: MrRoboto75
Always spaghetti, never forghetti

miauw62

  • Bay Watcher
  • Every time you get ahead / it's just another hit
    • View Profile
Re: MMORPGs?
« Reply #64 on: October 15, 2016, 04:14:00 pm »

Man, somewhere this thread makes me feel that games like Warframe are the future of the MMORPG, even though Warframe isn't an MMO, but a third-person RPG shooter.

The game does so many things right. It uses seemingly every trick in the book to motivate players to keep playing and grind, but somehow it doesn't actually bother me! The grind is often quite fun, because the best places to grind are increasing-difficulty missions, so it becomes a matter of how long you can hold out. The game makes you feel awesome. It has superhard missions that need a full team communicating over Skype. Planets have various tilesets (although the standard Grineer/Corpus Ship ones do get tiring after a while). The progression isn't focused on levels (although those do exist), but on enhancing your gear.

I have just pissed away two whole weeks at this game, so I may be biased. But it just seems to do so much right that people want out of their MMOs, without actually being an MMO!
Logged

Quote from: NW_Kohaku
they wouldn't be able to tell the difference between the raving confessions of a mass murdering cannibal from a recipe to bake a pie.
Knowing Belgium, everyone will vote for themselves out of mistrust for anyone else, and some kind of weird direct democracy coalition will need to be formed from 11 million or so individuals.

Akura

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: MMORPGs?
« Reply #65 on: October 15, 2016, 04:19:28 pm »

Exactly what I just said. An MMO with the following:

I think Gloria Victis has most of that, but I only played it a bit when it first released, so I don't know what they've been adding in those 600MB-1200MB updates they keep dropping every week or so.
Logged
Quote
They asked me how well I understood theoretical physics. I told them I had a theoretical degree in physics. They said welcome aboard.
... Yes, the hugs are for everyone.  No stabbing, though.  Just hugs.

nenjin

  • Bay Watcher
  • Inscrubtable Exhortations of the Soul
    • View Profile
Re: MMORPGs?
« Reply #66 on: October 15, 2016, 04:21:55 pm »

Man, somewhere this thread makes me feel that games like Warframe are the future of the MMORPG, even though Warframe isn't an MMO, but a third-person RPG shooter.

I've been waiting for Warframe to "take the next step" for probably two years now. I agree Warframe does a lot of things really well. What it NEEDS to break away from though is the instanced missions that make up the whole game. That's what still traps it in "F2P Arena shooter" mode rather than letting into grow into the FPS MMO it wants to be.

From everything I've seen though, Warframe's instances do not handle large numbers of people well, even when those numbers are below the instance threshold. I've yet to try any of the raid content in WF (just don't have enough active players in my clan) and I'm curious if it is refined at all or if it suffers from the fact WF is designed as a fast paced shooter game.

So yeah. I keep waiting for WF to step away from F2P, trivial grinds to something a little more robust and fleshed out. I think they've taken instance gameplay about as far as it can go, they need to think a little bigger. Like persistent areas for Tenno to do stuff in.
Logged
Cautivo del Milagro seamos, Penitente.
Quote from: Viktor Frankl
When we are no longer able to change a situation, we are challenged to change ourselves.
Quote from: Sindain
Its kinda silly to complain that a friendly NPC isn't a well designed boss fight.
Quote from: Eric Blank
How will I cheese now assholes?
Quote from: MrRoboto75
Always spaghetti, never forghetti

Flying Dice

  • Bay Watcher
  • inveterate shitposter
    • View Profile
Re: MMORPGs?
« Reply #67 on: October 15, 2016, 04:29:06 pm »

Yeah, Warframe's a pretty good blend of a set of mechanics that work well (the four-man co-op shooter popularized by L4D, ARPG loot-vacuuming, RPG equipment management and customization) with the MMO interconnectivity and group stuff. I actually really like that trading forces the parties to "physically" meet up in one or the other's guild hall to trade, it adds a much-needed human touch.

I just wish that they'd use centralized networking instead of this peer-to-peer bullshit, I gave up on playing WF because I couldn't connect to 95% of games. Did buy myself a full Frost Prime and a Latron Prime for pretty cheap (~400p for the former, ~300p for the latter, I think) before I left, though, so if they ever get their shit sorted I'll be set to get back into things pretty easily.

Like nenjin said though, they're apparently stuck on the formula now. They can add in more loot and missions, but what we really need is for it to start creeping into larger-scale PvE and maybe PvP that isn't kinda crap.

Exactly what I just said. An MMO with the following:

I think Gloria Victis has most of that, but I only played it a bit when it first released, so I don't know what they've been adding in those 600MB-1200MB updates they keep dropping every week or so.
Okay, let's check this ou-"early access on Steam", mixed reviews, $20 for an EA MMO...

Mm, I like the line they're trying to sell, but I'm not giving them money for this until it's actually complete and looks good. Thanks, though.



Logged


Aurora on small monitors:
1. Game Parameters -> Reduced Height Windows.
2. Lock taskbar to the right side of your desktop.
3. Run Resize Enable

Aklyon

  • Bay Watcher
  • Fate~
    • View Profile
Re: MMORPGs?
« Reply #68 on: October 15, 2016, 04:53:05 pm »

They are actually slowly working on (community hosted) dedi servers, but I think they are just for sportsframe (lunaro) and maybe conclave last I'd checked.

And afaik I think the relays aren't p2p, but they get some significant trouble on baro visits.
Logged
Crystalline (SG)
Sigtext
Quote from: RedKing
It's known as the Oppai-Kaiju effect. The islands of Japan generate a sort anti-gravity field, which allows breasts to behave as if in microgravity. It's also what allows Godzilla and friends to become 50 stories tall, and lets ninjas run up the side of a skyscraper.

nenjin

  • Bay Watcher
  • Inscrubtable Exhortations of the Soul
    • View Profile
Re: MMORPGs?
« Reply #69 on: October 15, 2016, 06:25:59 pm »

My guess is DE doesn't want to pay for the dedicated server infrastructure to support large shared instances. Which is why the Relays are laggy as fuck, they're probably being run on low-end machines. Dedicated servers would probably take a big bite out of the bottom line. F2P games work because your recurring costs are so low, so you can survive on microtransactions. When players bottom out and so do microtransactions but your server costs (minus bandwidth) remain unchanged....then you end up having to scale down.

To be honest if WF had like a $2.99 sub fee per month, I'd pay it, even if I didn't play it for months at a time. I'd do that so the game could grow. I just couldn't do it for a game like WoW where not playing for months was pissing away $150+.
Logged
Cautivo del Milagro seamos, Penitente.
Quote from: Viktor Frankl
When we are no longer able to change a situation, we are challenged to change ourselves.
Quote from: Sindain
Its kinda silly to complain that a friendly NPC isn't a well designed boss fight.
Quote from: Eric Blank
How will I cheese now assholes?
Quote from: MrRoboto75
Always spaghetti, never forghetti

Flying Dice

  • Bay Watcher
  • inveterate shitposter
    • View Profile
Re: MMORPGs?
« Reply #70 on: October 15, 2016, 07:07:16 pm »

Yeah, I'd pay a low sub for WF (or, hell, just buy stuff like you can now) if I could actually play it reliably. Shit was fun when it worked, but you can't run solo effectively.
Logged


Aurora on small monitors:
1. Game Parameters -> Reduced Height Windows.
2. Lock taskbar to the right side of your desktop.
3. Run Resize Enable

Aklyon

  • Bay Watcher
  • Fate~
    • View Profile
Re: MMORPGs?
« Reply #71 on: October 15, 2016, 08:10:48 pm »

Solo's worked fine for me.
Logged
Crystalline (SG)
Sigtext
Quote from: RedKing
It's known as the Oppai-Kaiju effect. The islands of Japan generate a sort anti-gravity field, which allows breasts to behave as if in microgravity. It's also what allows Godzilla and friends to become 50 stories tall, and lets ninjas run up the side of a skyscraper.

Flying Dice

  • Bay Watcher
  • inveterate shitposter
    • View Profile
Re: MMORPGs?
« Reply #72 on: October 15, 2016, 09:32:45 pm »

Problem is that I stopped being able to connect well before I'd farmed up everything I would need to run Void Survival to reasonable times. I can swing lower-level Extermination and stuff, but I really don't want to grind out a bunch of shit for warframes, weapons, taters, &c. entirely solo. Half the reason I played was for the team play (and the higher challenge in the same); there are plenty of games I could play if I just wanted to run around shooting things solo, even if WF is a lot of fun.

Granted, my primary is Loki, so it's at least possible, but there's not much point if I can't even use the stuff I get to have fun playing with other people.
Logged


Aurora on small monitors:
1. Game Parameters -> Reduced Height Windows.
2. Lock taskbar to the right side of your desktop.
3. Run Resize Enable

Cthulhu

  • Bay Watcher
  • A squid
    • View Profile
Re: MMORPGs?
« Reply #73 on: October 15, 2016, 11:10:40 pm »

The grind is too obvious in warframe for me to handle it.  There's nothing to really do except grind for shit that'll let you grind for different shit.
Logged
Shoes...

Aklyon

  • Bay Watcher
  • Fate~
    • View Profile
Re: MMORPGs?
« Reply #74 on: October 15, 2016, 11:22:30 pm »

Problem is that I stopped being able to connect well before I'd farmed up everything I would need to run Void Survival to reasonable times. I can swing lower-level Extermination and stuff, but I really don't want to grind out a bunch of shit for warframes, weapons, taters, &c. entirely solo. Half the reason I played was for the team play (and the higher challenge in the same); there are plenty of games I could play if I just wanted to run around shooting things solo, even if WF is a lot of fun.

Granted, my primary is Loki, so it's at least possible, but there's not much point if I can't even use the stuff I get to have fun playing with other people.
While void survival certainly looks prettier, why that one in particular? Its not the biggest area for prime parts anymore since relics.
Logged
Crystalline (SG)
Sigtext
Quote from: RedKing
It's known as the Oppai-Kaiju effect. The islands of Japan generate a sort anti-gravity field, which allows breasts to behave as if in microgravity. It's also what allows Godzilla and friends to become 50 stories tall, and lets ninjas run up the side of a skyscraper.
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 8