I mean, the order of importance in creation is pretty much Allah > Man > Woman. Trying to change Islam like that is heresy, it's not something that can be reformed like Christianity.
Apart from obviously the Islamic tradition being a reversioning of the Christian tradition which is a reversioning of the Jewish tradition, which itself was based off of traditions that included a female godhead in various capacities, if I said "Ninja > Pirate > Zombie" (or any order you would care to accept, in that highly controversial statement) why would the Ninja be considered a Pirate? A ninja is a ninja, a pirate is a pirate and a zombie is a zombie. (Each may also be one and/or the other class, as well, and that includes both Ninja Zombies and Zombie Ninjas.)
(Darnit, quoted instead of spoilered. Corrected. Again.)
And in any language where one has to make a clear choice of Masculine and Feminine (Arabic is exactly that, so far as I am aware), there has to be a polar choice made by
the person, or else go through convoluted hurdles to say the equivalent of "It" whilst retaining the deference one wishes to apply to the version of the almighty concerned...
Someone makes the choice, and that someone was a man. Whether he (or his inspiration) intended it, this choice then gets instantiated by others and accidentally/willfully taken as more literal than the original mere literary convenience.
(Gender is a sociopolitical issue not limited to religion, in short. If I had mentioned seeing my doctor, the other day, and then go on to say
she told me something about my health, would you have avoided the obvious initial but incorrect assumption? Or (over)compensated at the risk of him being male after all? Before going off into further realms of possibility.)