I've got it installed, but there's still a lot missing to make it worth the full migration. Can't figure out why it spams new bin processes endlessly either, I know it's multiprocess and all, but so is firefox now (got the main window and two tab processes atm) and despite all the crap I've got on here it's still snappier than vivaldi was just starting fresh.
Was looking into the ungoogled chromium versions, inox looked good on arch but the compile keeps cutting out. A tip for anyone else trying one of the ungoogled compiles: switch your makepkg.conf to use a different path, the normal linux route of putting it in /tmp or whatever and allocating 2 GB won't work with chromium's fat ass wanting 3 GB or more sometimes for compiling.
Now, I can understand mozilla wanting to move away from slapping more layers of spaghetti to keep the old ass add-ons working, but for the life of me I can not understand why arbitrarily limiting ui manipulation is something firefox can justify.
Chrome doesn't give a fuck about what you want, it just relies on always being there like that reliable old ex-turned-fuckbuddy that never seems to ask for much up front, but then you discover they're stalking you again and one morning you wake up to find them hiding in the cabinet reading your emails in the nude...
Opera was hip and cool and into freedom and changing itself, helped firefox with a lot of ideas back in the day, but it started getting old, started trying to dress younger, change their hair color, and even imitating chrome now.
Safari is uh... well, you remember that one date you had where they were really cute and all, but you found out later they were basically just bait to bring new members into a cult? Yeah...
Vivaldi is cute and edgy, kinda reminds you of an old crush, but it could lose some weight, and it's got to work out some stability issues, but hey, it might work out later, right?