Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

Tigra

5 (31.3%)

Wei He

9 (56.3%)

Sindhu

2 (12.5%)

Total Members Voted: 16

Voting closed: November 05, 2016, 04:00:47 pm

[Chevaleresse]

C

F

Shoulda fought to the bitter end. Would have, at the least, been a much better way to go out.

Trying to do that was literally why we lost. Like, all the fucking time.

[Criptfeind]

We literally lost because we didn't work on our economic situation (despite being given two events to do so) when it was at a critical point.

[flazeo25]

B

[Atian the Elephantman God]

C

[vastaghen12]

B

I only regret that no king lasted long enough for me to have draw fanart.
I missed the chance with Houladine III

[Chevaleresse]

We literally lost because we didn't work on our economic situation (despite being given two events to do so) when it was at a critical point.

We were in that situation because we pressed an unwinnable war too far. We were in that situation because we refused to stop the other wars. We lost at least two kings because we ran into an extremely dangerous situation for no reason (and another narrowly survived despite this).

But failing utterly to rectify the economic situation at all was uh, yeah. Why were we so intent on keeping our relics, again?

[Prophet]

Thought they would be useful later. Didn't know that it would lead to losing.

I guess lesson learned for next time?

[Chiefwaffles]

People here are spoiled by the decadent GMs who give the players too much plot armor.
Truly disgusting and abhorring.

[Criptfeind]

Eh. I'm not so sure about that line of reasoning. The war was clearly a set up from the start. We were betrayed twice over, it's hard to imagine they weren't looking to screw us anyway and that war was possible to avoid. And we lost because we had a string of bad rolls. If we'd rolled well at that point instead of poorly, we'd have won and then it would have looked foolish to think about backing down.

As for the relics, I think the necklace was probably critical to rebuilding the kingdom. Murdertime should have been sold.

[heydude6]

Probably because we didn't know that having our economy reach zero for two turns would instantly lose us the game. I thought the lose condition was for the damadian republic to completely conquer us or for us to die without having any possible successor (therefore having a non-Houlandin become the new leader). If I knew we were about to lose, I would have sold the relics.

[Criptfeind]

Although this is another case of just using hindsight, I thought that the red! was a somewhat clear indication that the game was close to ending because of this critical issue. Or, maybe that's just because that's how it works in Reigns, which. I think this game was partially inspired by? I'm not sure on that one. To be honest I was mostly surprised by the one year grace period.

[omada]

Wow, that was nice afterall.

I don't really know what to choose, A? till the last drop of blood? As a bitter family member trying to raise the family again?

[NUKE9.13]

Fair enough. I had hoped we might be able to loan some money from somewhere, but I guess we should've set up a central bank if we wanted to do that.

Well, game over is game over. I mean, if Haspen still feels like running some version of this game, more power to him. But this thread, at least, should go the way of the Houlandines.

Whatever Haspen feels like

[Puppyguard]

Noooooo!

B
I wasn't there when this spamkingdom was started so B.

Alternatively you could also come up with a new game, haspen.

[Taricus]

A