Vote Count:
Tiruin: (1) - BlackHeartKabal
FallacyofUrist: (5) - Deus Asmoth, Jack A.T, Juicebox, TDS, GayArchea
GayArchaea: 1 - oragamiscienceguy
6 to hammer
Hooo, dat hammer .___.
At least I'm glad I've a precautionary 'post logo seal' prevention measure present so nobody can say I voted to hammer.
I still have to read up on the whole FoU thing but a skim didn't roll over my impression on him as warranting my vote...
Eh? This surprises me slightly, what with 4 other people bandwagoning me. Might I know your reasons for me "not warranting your vote"?
Missed this one, for starters.
Hum. Recap!
Your posts in order on Day 2:
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6,
7,
8,
9,
10,
11,
12,
13,
14,
15,
16,
17,
18,
19,
20,
21,
22, and the last being your
23rd post, don't really give me the impression parallel to those voting you--albeit my main objective is information and Jack has made a good case about it regarding the hammer-lynch.
You:
> Investigated JACK and got MAFIA {Personally, you're insane or misleading--the latter due to possible changes to abilities; I recommend checking ME or anyone else who had a TOWN reading}, you were one of the first to claim after me and a few others, thereby having time to mirror and reflect ideas out. You also added to the idea about mind reading the dead (#2, 3), although I'm curious how that works because technically, the mind but be alive or receptive in order for that contextual power to actually...y'know, work.
Although the curious fact that our abilities (at least as I can infer from my WUN ability :v) does NOT have flavor to it, it may be me just latching onto tiny straws rather than the bundles around.
> Those voting you are reasonable, following their own reasoning on why you're to be lynched. Your attitude in Day 1 however is under a town-ish mindset; individualistic, proactive, curious. There's a lack of isolationism or subtle workings with others--especially poised within questions and queries, which may indicate a mafia/team alignment (
like stuff from here or in #6, the tone and structuring; although I may be putting more onto that rather than checking the flow of your ideas). You have
ONE POWER, so you're essentially an INSANE version of me, and I am interested in knowing more. All these tie into why I'm NOT voting you--I can see the reasoning, in part, in others voting for you by their perception of personality, and I can see characteristics that speak up for you, although a counter-point would be wanting to lynch you to see the differences in flavor since I am deeply curious about this.
That said, could I ask you to post about your flavor and role?
> You asked OSG important questions,
following a query you thought about in #2. He avoided it in a way, and before his answer there, there was no notice of denying him being a headmaster
until he said so :v You've a characteristic of classic cop stubbornness however (#11), so I've to ask
what do you believe more--the validity of your findings or the idea that there may be sanity issues?
Next, do you believe yourself sane, or insane, with the background contrasted with the rest of our claims?You've also been consistent with your voting on Jack there. Until lately. (#21) Following a good point that I personally agree with in Jack's reasoning.
> Soooo, I am undecided with my vote at the moment. :v
OSG is a one-shot multi-shot, 7-shot person, who has used a ROLE inspect on GA. Given that
GA, DA, and OSG are not alignment cops, it may give the idea that they aren't connected. DA may be with others or may have connections, but GA has unveiled that they're a third-party in a way of being a Lyncher (no target designated in public).
So I'm curious that the mafia team, as
there is one, may be of a alignment-cop nature, because the majority (as it seems) have that kind of power, and it seems more beneficial for them to add to the confusion. Sanity issues aside, you (FoU) have targeted JACK A T, who was first to claim Mafia result on me, along with TheMoonlightShadow. You hit Mafia on him. I hit town on TDS. And...where was that summary of people's night one actions? It's in Jack's posts as far as I recall >_<
Anyway that bit there is important as it notes the idea of relationships in the big picture; considering you claimed up front instead of merely remarking on your confusion (and you not voting is also noted in your first statement, #1), it's an important piece in my notes that you may not be scum.
So yeah.
...I've to re-read on everyone else >_> But I'm leaning to agree (with myself :v) that FoU ain't scum like that.