Neo I gotta defend Descan on this, and this bit of criticism is especially pertinent
Neo, it's not that you're wrong, it's that you come in, make assumption without source or anything (because if you provide source, you might get a discussion?) and then expect people to take your seriously.
This is a quote from an older thread discussion where a very similar thing happened
The bit Descan said about how you don't leave anything to hook into and start a discussion is especially pertinent, because you tend to avoid any sources which makes it impossible to discuss what you're saying
From the same discussion:
Never EVER going to provide proof... It really isn't worth it. No one is gonna pull me into it.
If you're just going to go by and drop baseless accusations and not give us the respect of posting proof when asked, then don't bother posting.
This is why I don't take your criticisms seriously. It is more bias then genuine observation... Such as back when people said I hated all games and then I actually looked at my post history and found... In fact I had far more positive posts about games then negative. Even to the extent that people would refer to my positive posts as negative as well.
So... Excuse me Princess.
So I don't think Princess Descan needs to be excused, as it's a genuine observation loads of people from across the world with loads of political biases all coming to the conclusion that you like making vague phrases with no sources, whilst having this bizarre attitude of presumption, where you expect everyone to be able to understand you with no presentation of fact needed. We are all very different, we all live very different lives, we need material to work with otherwise there can be no discussion at all - we'd either be at an impasse or merely talking about how much we agree or disagree with our biases
Look up Lady Gaga 
What about her? Her next tour schedule? How much her first album made? The name of her childhood pets? No, neonivek, you look up Lady Gaga and link whatever about her is relevant to the discussion.
It is common knowledge. So much so that the Simpsons referenced it.
This sort of conversation is something lots of people have found occasionally with you, the empty statement or assertion incomplete of any source, and when prompted to actually provide any substance for your point you just talk about how everyone else should know or how "obvious" it is
We all like you Neonivek, it just gets very frustrating seeing the same sort of presumption that the reader should automatically know all that you know. That would be impossible, bay12 has no psychics on the forum xD
I think Neo's incoherent mutterings are part of the charm, but Neo should accept that if he is not going to use clear language and articulate a thought thoroughly, nobody is obligated to forensically deduce what the heck he's saying.
While we're airing our dirty laundry, I auto-ignore anyone who doesn't use punctuation and capitalization.
The Only People I Instantly Ignore Are Those Who Write Like This
Author
Topic: Doc Helgoland's Asylum for the Politically American: T+0 (Read 1427289 times)