... holy shit, BFEL. If that's what you've seen you have not been seeing bloody
jack-all. Just about everything even remotely negative of clinton has been blown massively out of proportion, when it's not just flat out invented; at the same time, trump's ridiculously myriad cavalcade of fuck ups barely get screen time. If you want some harder data you can look at
something like this. There's more stuff out there if you feel like poking around.
From stuff like that, the treatment has been relatively equitable, to a fair degree -- which is the problem. Part of what that doesn't show is that even with the negative coverage trump is catching, a chunk of what's going on with trump (and where the "pro-trump bias" message comes from, to a large extent) is that it's not nearly as negative as it
should be considering what a colossal pile of shit the man is. Whereas with clinton -- as we've seen in the past few days in relation to comey's mess, which has largely been par for the course for months to years -- stuff that's
functionally nothing gets plastered across the airwaves and screamed to the heavens as writ gospel of malfeasance. The way media's been handling the two isn't even
remotely equitable. If clinton or the clinton foundation had done a
quarter of what trump or his foundation has done, the sodding media would catch fire and explode in their haste to take a shit on our dem candidate.
You want another example, you can do some google searching on the reaction to clinton ordering some emails deleted before a subpeona was, and then search around for how people's been reacting to the written testament of multiple bloody judges that trump and his company has spent years of time intentionally deleting electronic evidence while under investigation and doing his damnedest to obfuscate and obstruct as well. You'll notice
something of a difference, and it's stuff like that where the accusations of pro-trump bias are coming from more than just about anything.
Maybe something directly from clinton
You can check
ontheissues for some direct quotes related to the subject, track down the source at your leisure. Pretty sure there's something on her website, too, but the issues page currently seems to be on the fritz, at least for me, so I can't double check at the moment
There's also some lines in the third debate that's pretty consistent about a no-fly zone being in relation to negotiations and agreement with russia and syria.
Author
Topic: Doc Helgoland's Asylum for the Politically American: T+0 (Read 1388491 times)