I don't really want to have to list out my reasons in order to oppose something. Sometimes I just don't like it, for one.
Okay, but have thought about the proposer feels? He makes a proposal, in the hopes of getting it allowed, only for some random god to come along and tell him "no". Why did the god do this? He doesn't know. Is there some irreconciliable ethical difference between the two of them that would make discussion pointless? Should he even bother asking the reason? If the other god couldn't even be bothered to explain why, surely they would be too apathetic to change their vote? Perhaps the god doesn't even have a reason, ruining the proposers grand plans on a whim. And then several other gods come along and tell him "no" too, with the same lack of explanation.
Are you having fun yet?
If someone opposed my stuff, they oppose it. I don't make a big deal out of it. Plenty of other gods who can support it. If several gods oppose it, there's obviously a running theme, and likely at least one common reason. And if I can't think of why they might have opposed it, I'll ask. Most of the time, I can take an educated guess, and either try to address the concern, or let it be, if it's something I don't think is reconciliable. If they do give a reason, I actually feel pressured to respond, lest they color other gods' thinking unduly, if they have misinterpreted. Unique Form, for example, has the same checks and balances Innate Magic does, and is meant to be nonspecific, to avoid a glut of single-use traits.
Oh, and I would
really appreciate if you guys could avoid taking a hostile tone with each other right now. I'd really rather not have all of my interactions online be competitive.