Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[TheDarkStar]

Sure.

Extend.

[Persus13]

Extend. I'll be gone all day.

[Mephansteras]

The Vote Tally
BlackHeartKabal: origamiscienceguy
fillipk: Deus Asmoth
origamiscienceguy: Jack A T
Persus13: TheDarkStar
TheDarkStar: BlackHeartKabal, fillipk, Persus13


Day has been Extended to ~4pm Pacific Monday. 1 Possible extension remains for this day.

[BlackHeartKabal]

Alright.

Jack A T - riverfriend Shares my role, apparently. Driving force behind most of the town's play. Needless to say, he's as close to town as you can get without mechanical confirmation. Would vote to lynch if being held at gunpoint at desk.
origamiscienceguy - The Disciple of Iron Will, as he says. Some of his actions make me think that he's the last mafia, but the mafia wouldn't risk claiming Iron Will due to the possibility of counter claims. Is on the list of priority lynches, at lowest priority.
TheDarkStar- A third party is absolutely not inclined to work with the town. They work for nobody but themselves, True Neutrals, Neutral Evils, whatever terminology you prefer. It is absolutely imperative we lynch him ASAP. I would, in an extreme case, be inclined to ask Jack A T to help me vig him with Corruption, which would serve the dual purpose of getting rid of it.
fillipk - Second lowest on the list of priority lynches. Doesn't come off as town to me due to a mix of low participation, demeanor, and offering of a 50%/50% between Persus. He is probably very likely the last mafia.
Deus Asmoth - Abrasive Wellspring, cooperating for purposes of the game. Absolutely town.
Persus13 - Second highest on the list of priority lynches, due to same reasoning as fillipk sans 50% offering. We should lynch him if fillipk turns up pure.

[fillipk]

It's a 50/50 mix because both Persus and TheDarkStar are both scum too me, People haven't decided who they want to lynch though

BHK how about we both lynch Persus just in case TheDarkStar actually isn't trying to kill us all.

Here I'll Unvote

Persus13 now your turn.

[Deus Asmoth]

BHK, if you want to get back into the game instead of having a pointless argument, maybe you should stop being such a passive aggressive shitlord.

[BlackHeartKabal]

BHK, if you want to get back into the game instead of having a pointless argument, maybe you should stop being such a passive aggressive shitlord.

There was no aggression there. If someone is difficult for me to interact with, they're abrasive.

[Deus Asmoth]

First of all, no. That's not what abrasive means.

Second of all, yes, it was passive aggressive from the choice of words to the implication that I was only going along with the plan out of self interest.

Third, considering your claim of being able to predict my behaviour based off word choice, you've lost any right to tell me about intent.

Oh, and then there's the claim that I'm cooperating with you considering this was set in motion during day 2, when you were busy covering your own ass.

[BlackHeartKabal]

BHK, if you want to get back into the game instead of having a pointless argument, maybe you should stop being such a passive aggressive shitlord.

With your attitude towards me, I have zero inclination not to be a "passive aggressive shitlord".

First of all, no. That's not what abrasive means.

Second of all, yes, it was passive aggressive from the choice of words to the implication that I was only going along with the plan out of self interest.

Third, considering your claim of being able to predict my behaviour based off word choice, you've lost any right to tell me about intent.

Oh, and then there's the claim that I'm cooperating with you considering this was set in motion during day 2, when you were busy covering your own ass.

1 - I worded that wrong, yes, but you can certainly see my point and pretend not to understand.

2 - Why am I not inclined to think that you're a person who can cooperate with someone you dislike so vehemently out of mutual interest?

3 - I will state what I observe if someone asks me to, within reason, and you have no ability to enforce me saying such.

4 - You're willing to vote someone you're annoyed with. Votes naturally get players killed, so I can assume from that display that you'd have less of a problem as a town role with actual killing power offing an annoying town player, which could cost the town a game, which is, naturally, not a trait I like in someone who plays mafia.

[BlackHeartKabal]

I'm also going to state that this is utterly idiotic, and if you're willing to stop arguing, you can automatically consider that I am as well. If not for how much people hate it in mafia, I'd actually edit the post.

[Deus Asmoth]

What's my "attitude towards you", exactly? How have I treated you any differently to literally anyone else I've ever played this game with?

1, I never said I didn't understand. I said that you used the word wrongly, which you did.

2, see this is the problem. I voted for you because you were obviously not playing with the town's interests as your primary focus. You seem to be determined to take that as a personal insult despite admitting that you were doing so. You were the one who decided to take it further, you were the one who went for personal insults, and you're the one who seems to think that you can claim to want to drop it while still slipping in snide commentary.

3, are you trying to argue that your personal opinion of me has any conceivable relevance to this game? If you're going to justify you're entire view of me based off grammar, I'm going to pull you up over the same thing. Are you intentionally being a hypocrite or are you doing it accidentally?

4, I wasn't voting for an annoying town player. I was voting for a player who had done nothing to benefit the town, had admitted that their own survival was more important to them than the town, and was making vague threats about how awful it would be if they died. Those aren't traits I like to see in someone who plays mafia. More importantly, they're all scumtells, and I voted for you because of them. Grow up and get over it.

5, I was perfectly willing to drop it. You clearly aren't if your definition of dropping it includes inserting comments about how utterly awful I am whenever you get the opportunity.

[Deus Asmoth]

Oh, and
OSG.
I'd prefer if fillipk got lynched, but it's better than lynching the third party.

[origamiscienceguy]

Request Replacement

Bad week at work and round two of exams coming up. Don't feel motivated to try at all.

[BlackHeartKabal]

What's my "attitude towards you", exactly? How have I treated you any differently to literally anyone else I've ever played this game with?

1, I never said I didn't understand. I said that you used the word wrongly, which you did.

2, see this is the problem. I voted for you because you were obviously not playing with the town's interests as your primary focus. You seem to be determined to take that as a personal insult despite admitting that you were doing so. You were the one who decided to take it further, you were the one who went for personal insults, and you're the one who seems to think that you can claim to want to drop it while still slipping in snide commentary.

3, are you trying to argue that your personal opinion of me has any conceivable relevance to this game? If you're going to justify you're entire view of me based off grammar, I'm going to pull you up over the same thing. Are you intentionally being a hypocrite or are you doing it accidentally?

4, I wasn't voting for an annoying town player. I was voting for a player who had done nothing to benefit the town, had admitted that their own survival was more important to them than the town, and was making vague threats about how awful it would be if they died. Those aren't traits I like to see in someone who plays mafia. More importantly, they're all scumtells, and I voted for you because of them. Grow up and get over it.

5, I was perfectly willing to drop it. You clearly aren't if your definition of dropping it includes inserting comments about how utterly awful I am whenever you get the opportunity.

I'm on mobile, I'm not going to type this on a phone. I just want the argument to stop, so assume the responses to your points are based with that in mind.

I also want to know why scum we know so much about is more important than a third party who's mechanics we only know of through (italics) the third party themselves (italics).

[Deus Asmoth]

Because we don't win by lynching third parties, primarily. Also because even if TDS is some kind of serial killer tailored to this setup (probably by being some kind of arsonist) he still doesn't have fillipk marked, so he can't win tonight. That means that advancing the search for scum is a higher priority as far as I'm concerned.

I also can't help but think that TDS could have something that he needs to trigger by being lynched considering he knows that claiming a third party role would likely result in immediately getting killed.