1.what I claimed my role to be was confirmed since nobody except Deus has claimed to be able to purify posts.
Your power is proven. It's a power of use to both sides.
2. Persus claimed Flabort corrupted his post, which was one of many you quoted in post #77. Post #77 was not corrupted and therefore Flabort poured post #77 as pouring a post removes it of its aspect and he was a Gnawer of Roots.
Again, this is without a shadow of a doubt wrong. A pour of post 77 would have hit posts 47, 43, and 66, all of which have never been altered.
3. Scum don't have an auto night kill and the one night where all scum were alive they didn't drown us in corruption. Plus the third party is actively counteracting the scum's nightkill. The odds are that there are more then two scum
The balance of this game is a mess no matter what. Experimental gimmick setup, first of its kind. Meph is excellent at what he does, but I do not think he foresaw much of what happened. We had a self-confirming self-protecting townie by D2, an absolutely ridiculous role in just about any setup and one I'm certain Meph did not intend. The big gimmick's major result was to generate a pile of confirmed not-corrupters. The distributed nightkill is incredibly hard to balance in any situation, as it's a death spiral mechanic like no other.
Even if there is only one Mafia left it's probably Jack as he let BHK claim his role flavor for him and what his role does, and all he said was that he has the same role.
I have been confirmed to have been pouring at the same time as the corrupter was acting.
all he said was that he has the same role.
This is incorrect. I gave details not given by BHK that BHK props up.