For balance,
this is the publicly posted picture of the guys who say they want to take over, violently. Same guys who just tried to do a terror attack at a public event at the ministry building:
Maduro responded by saying that if there is a
violent takever then the left will resist. e.g. if there's a military extra-legal coup then they will fight. It's kind of a rock and a hard place. How
should an elected official respond to threats of a military coup? "Oh ok no harm done?" Maduro was in fact
elected and hasn't finished his term, which ends next year. He'll probably lose that election, he might not even stand for re-election. The opposition want to have a military takeover
before the scheduled election, for "reasons" because then they can rewrite the rules and carry out a purge.
Also remember that the right when they were in power carried out
mass killing against protestors (estimates range from hundreds to thousands killed) without batting an eyelid. Well ... you can say that was a while ago, but they did the same shit in 2002 when they were in power for a couple of days, there's footage of the right-wing cops firing shotguns into crowds of protestors etc, and many of the leaders from then are part of the same thing now. Contrast that to deaths in the current protests where they're stretching to count deaths
caused by protestors or the protests as "Maduro's fault", and the story is completely different.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-04-27/venezuela-death-toll-jumps-as-protesters-battle-security-forces/8475488http://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-39645809The best they can come up with is that the government used tear gas and water cannons against rioters. One protestor got killed by being hit in the head by a cannister, which is probably in the realms of accidental death. Also, a lot of security forces are coming under sniper fire and the like, those are being counted in these news reports in the protest-death headlines.
If you read the descriptions of the times there
was deliberate targeting of rightwingers in the examples in that BBC article, one parallel comes to mind:
Antifa. That's basically one of the problems here. Same as the USA, Venezuela has violent grassroots people on both sides of the political fence. Once shooting starts between those grassroots elements, normal control is basically off the table. But almost none of the deaths are attributable to
security forces using deadly force against protestors. It makes about as much sense to blame Maduro directly for shootings that occur between grassroots activists on both sides, as to blame Hillary Clinton and Obama for whatever Antifa does.