Extend.BHK: When you asked NQT for his reasons for not claiming, did you expect a general strategic answer (like the one you got), one more specifically tied to his perceptions of his role, or something else?
Jack, did you change the title on reply 71 yourself?
Deus: No. I quoted a post by that title.
Tiruin, please ask Jack a question.
NQT: Why her and why me? I have a feeling I know why, but I want to confirm.
Yes, I use rhetorical exaggeration for argument, so... What?
Like, seriously, what exactly is wrong with that?
TheBiggerFish: It's not that rhetorical exaggeration is bad. It's that in this case, your over-the-top rhetoric helped show how nervous that FoS made you. It is part of a collection of evidence indicating you were quite perturbed by an error-based early D1 FoS. That you could even speak of rolling over and dying in the face of
that, even with your predilection towards overstatement, says something.
Right now, I'm trying to figure out whether this is the nervousness of scum worried about being caught/unnerved by someone seeming slightly on to them, or the nervousness of somewhat inexperienced town under suspicion.
I did not think he had realized that I was answering Wozzy. That's why I asked it.
...I'll ask again, because you didn't answer: why did you take the "jumping on me for answering someone's question" tack?
In general:Yes, I may be overreacting to FoSs, probably because I really haven't had that much chance to calibrate just how suspicious the people in this game are when they use it. It could mean, y'know, 'I'm going to vote you if you say anything wrong' or 'That's interesting in a bad way' and I don't know which.
Like all things in mafia, it's contextual and varied. FoSes are almost always below votes in suspicion level, though. In the start of D1, that's an incredibly low bar.