Unsurprising that you're defending ATH, meng.
Vote me then, nerd. I want you to explain why it's bad that I'm defending him. If you think someone's Town, do you want them lynched instead?
You don't know he's town, though, do you? You were right on the nail with thinking snow dwarf was scum yesterday, after all.
Indeed, your first read of the game was snow dwarf is scum. Second read was ATH is town.
You admitted your reads on them stemmed from "feelings", which we know aren't very accurate after dat flip m9.
There's no qualitative difference between snow dwarf's and ATH's posts, so I struggle to see how you can feel they're both different alignments.
ATH just wasted a page (at default PPP) arguing with me and then saying at the end "nahnahnah, sorry pal, ignore all that I was just being mental." which is a lot scummier than anything snow dwarf did yesterday, yet you're still sure he's town. 'scuse me for finding that a wee bit suspicious.
You're right, I don't know he's Town, but I'm way more sure he's town than you are, so if you're planning to vote and lynch him, you better believe I'm not going to screw around and let you do it. I'm not upset over being wrong on snow child. I figured it was a distinct possibility. What he did would've warranted the same response in a normal game. I fail to see the issue. Are you going to use that against me? Any more passive attacks you want to make before you get them all out? I'll make 'em for you: You haven't posted anything relevant since the Day started; you're experienced yet you lynched a townie; you're buddying with ATH; you're chainsaw defending ATH; you're not scumhunting; you're not creating a useful environment for new players to learn. Am I missing any? Are you gonna vote me yet? What are you waiting for? I don't understand how I'm less suspicious than ATH at this point, right? Here, I'll help you out.
hector13.
hector13 hector13 hector13 hector13 hector13 hector13 hector13 hector13 hector13 hector13 hector13 hector13.
Yeah, now what? You gonna vote me yet? Or were you just waiting for this, so that you could claim OMGUS without having to actually, you know, vote me. I can believe it, but the issue is that if you want ammo against me, it's typically better if you use it before I do. You don't have to like it, but it's true. I'm not lying because I don't have to lie. There's nothing for me to lie about.
Does that make me your enemy?
Look, my goal is two things: To teach people how to play (in the sick, twisted way that I do), and to win. I don't expect you to play like I do. In fact, I suggest against it. But, if you think ATH is scum, then I will vote you. I will vote you because I believe you're wrong on purpose. You're using snow dwarf against me, when it was very clearly a viable lynch. You're making a number of passive attacks against me, but you're refusing to vote me. You're not even FoSing me. It's uncanny how you're avoiding a direct assault.
I want you to think very clearly about your statistics: 1 in 4 of those players are scum according to you. If that's true, then what about the people that didn't vote snow dwarf? Are they 1 in 3? In fact, the chance for anyone to be scum is 2 in 8, correct?
But that's not true.
The chance for anyone to be scum is 2 in 7. You always assume you're town. So, if you believe that one person in that list is scum, then what are the chances that scum avoided a bandwagon on Town? I find it more likely to avoid trying to lynch a Townie: The essence of the Trying Too Hard To Look Town scumtell. And you know, it usually IS a nulltell, but for beginners, it has outstanding merit. So, it's actually more likely that one of the three people who DIDN'T vote snow dwarf is scum.
... You didn't vote snow dwarf, did you?
Why not?
Yeah, that's right. I'm asking why you DIDN'T vote a town player. Why did you believe he wasn't scum? It seems odd, really. He made a scummy series of plays. His behavior was suspicious. And yet, you didn't vote him, right?
Why not?