Here's a list of whom voted for snow dwarf, in order so far as I can tell:
Gentlefish, webadict, AbstractTraitorHero, doomchild, Persus13
Time to hunt for the bandwagoniers!
DoomChild:
You've had reasoned suspicions for snow, and voted him when he offered the idea that maybe he -was- mafia. Your vote -seems- right, but if I take a page out of Hector's book () that does make me feel a little uncomfortable. Do you think it's likely that someone whom voted for snow dwarf is mafia? How do you plan on rooting them out?
First off, I think calling all of the votes on snow dwarf a bandwagon is an indirect attack. Some people might have been bandwagoning, but people choosing independently to vote for the same target is not a bandwagon. A part of why I took a while to finally put my vote down was because I knew that I would get accused of hopping on the bandwagon, when in fact I had legitimate suspicions.
Secondly, this whole "that seems right, and therefore it must be scummy" thing has me really confused. So, I'm being attacked for following up on what I and others perceive as scummy behavior? That mindset seems to imply that townies should play their cards close to the vest, which I think is a big mistake. The mafia has the advantage when nobody acts openly, because suspicion brews fast and hot in that kind of environment.
Finally, coming from a purely statistical point of view, it seems reasonably likely to me that at least one scum was in the list of snow dwarf voters. We know Persus13 was town, so that leaves the other 4. I feel like I've been completely open and honest about why I was suspicious of snow dwarf, and I think the only way to make any headway on finding out if there is a scum in the list is for everybody else to do the same.
Gentlefish, in case it wasn't obvious, I was hoping for some answers to this stuff, particularly the "seems right" part.
With the "seems like a right answer", I was making a joke on Hector's expense, as he accused me of giving him the "right answers", though I stated them in honesty.
And you didn't answer the second half of my question. Or maybe you did with that deflection at the end:
I feel like I've been completely open and honest about why I was suspicious of snow dwarf, and I think the only way to make any headway on finding out if there is a scum in the list is for everybody else to do the same.
Like, this is mafia. I can guarantee you that at
least two people are lying through their teeth right now. Can you give me a clearer answer as to your tactics? So far, I've started the vote that got Persus (sadly, a townie) lynched, and I've started this run on ATH, who so far still hasn't done enough to shake off my suspicion.
So let me get your claims straight you guys think I'm scum because you believe I bandwagoned and I've not been very helpful am I correct?
Actually this is exactly my reasoning for my current votes. You're not doing very much at all in terms of content per post, and in even attempting to scumhunt. You're just defending yourself. Why won't you scum hunt? Is it really because you're scum and you know who's guilty already?