D2 posts in which OSG attacks:
ouch.
there are three of us left. I have noticed that Revarie had been sort of ignoring roo for most of day 1, not attacking him.
This is hilariously weak, but it was one of the first posts of D2. The fact that OSG came out fighting is a point in his favour.
The townie who was lynched would probably vengekill the guy who I thought was scum because I was "pretending to be on their side" according to your theory, then they would listen. So why wuldn't I just pressure him to vengekill another townie and win the game outright? It ends the day earlier. Your theory makes no sense, and I don't see why you continue trying to find a reason to lynch me. Unless you are scum. That is.
This stuff has been argued pretty thoroughly, so I'm going to just say I disagree and leave it at that. If you need a refresher, just click the quote.
ow.ow.ow
I managed to put another one of my grievences into words:
Revarie controlled the day1 lynch, Roo (godfather) and EP followed you. The only person who didn't follow you (and thus dragged the day for a week or so) was me. I was the only one who didn't follow you like you expected. So when day 2 comes along, you know EP will follow you, so you go after me instead.
I'm not sure how I feel about this one. It's an attack, I guess, though it's worth noting that OSG's core reason for not following the TempAcc lynch only worked because three people were already voting him; had that *not* happened, OSG could (presumably) have ended up voting for him.
I was thinking you could have agreed with roo to accept the risk of the venekill and roo would be a reletiely silent killer at that point. After thinking it over, if I was on the outside looking in, That would seem more likely than what you were suggesting about me, but not by all that much. So. I am thinking that I will change my vote to ElephantParade since fom a third peson perspective, he has not done much of anything, very neutal in everything. Which would be a great scum disguise. I still have a bad feeling about you, Revarie, but after some days (and nights) of contemplation, I think that EP is actually more likely (statistically) to be scum.
My response to this is below the dividing line.
So, yeah. OSG has been pretty defensive throughout the entire day; his three attacks at Reverie were pretty weak, and he only threw stuff at me after I mentioned he hadn't. Does this mean he's scum? I don't know, and, rather than spending the next four days coming to a conclusion, I'm just going to post this stuff so people can discuss it. I'll think about it in the car tomorrow, I guess. I think his defensiveness is a point against him, but it could also be a natural reaction towards being pressured by two people.
My gut feeling, if you're wondering, is that his defensiveness is because he's scum. I generally don't trust gut feelings, though.
I think that EP is actually more likely (statistically) to be scum.
What do you mean by "statistically"? As for being neutral: I've been kind of hesitant to take strong positions, since mislynches are so absurdly horrible in this game, and I don't want to be the new player that makes the town lose. At the same time, strong positions are required for anything to get done; I think I've learned that from this game. I tend to waffle in real life, too; it's not just Mafia.
Also, this is my first hammer-based game, and my response to the style was both a paralyzing fear of voting and a tendency towards procrastination. I am probably going to avoid hammer-based games in the future, for the most part.
So, yeah; the combination of a hammer and a low playercount makes me feel a bit nervous about taking strong positions, because it's really bad if I'm wrong—if
anyone is wrong.