If this post feels a bit incoherent, it's because
A: I've been writing it on and off for a week, and
B: Bay12's post editor is really bad when you're working with quotes, so I was disinclined to edit much
I think OSG is scum. Thus far, his playstyle has been almost purely reactive; when he has nothing to react to, he generally doesn't do anything. Admittedly, Mafia is an inherently reactive game, but OSG takes it to a new level.
Revarie: You seem to be a returning veteran, but I have never played with you. Just to let you know, roo will never answer anything, and he always gets lynched day one because of it.
That sounds an awful lot like you're hinging on him getting lynched day one. Would that further your goals, origamiscienceguy?
Nope. Just stating the facts. Look at any game roo has been in. (There are a few where he doesn't get lynched day 1, but the not answering questions I think is 100% correct.)
OSG oh my I think my prediction is correct tho. Your op makes no sense lol. What the hell is temp gonna tell you other than what he has already said?
And I answer things that merit a response. If I don't answer anything why are you asking me things? Rather than do someting productive. Your whole post is just wordy and pings me a lot.
roo: Temp did answer with more information right here:TempAcc: I think I've seen you around this subforum at some point, but I can't remember. Care to fill me in?
This is me. Essentialy just a regular general discussion goer that rarely gets into forum games. Generally looked with suspicion on this forum due to a combination of a) being a lawyer, b) not being an atheist, c) not being a leftie and d) Tim Curry.
It is not anything partaining to the game, but it is getting conversations started, unlike you, who have still yet to answer my question. And, by the way, your prediction is wrong. I am town.
OSG you scum brah?
Nope.
OrigamiScienceGuy: I have a faint memory of seeing you in the "play with your friends" subsection of the ~other games~ forum. Did you ever take part in dominions 3/4 matches?
I have been in that section, but I haven't played that particular game. Perhaps you participated in one of my "You can't die" interactive storytelling games.
After RVS, OSG doesn't seek out interactions with anyone other than roo, whom he tunnels. During this time, I ask him to broaden his horizons:
OSG: It has been two days. Outside of your RVS questions, you have only directed questions at roo; in fact, excluding question responses—you ignored my question, by the way—and a few short responses to posts, you have only interacted with roo. Take your blinders off! Again: What are your reads?
TempAcc: You might think you have enough information, but you really don't; none of us do. None of us can, yet. Get posting! Okay, you're busy, but please stop lurking as soon as you have time.
roo: Why did you want to see one of my past games, anyway?
In response, he does post his reads:
Who would you lynch right now. Or who would you call scum right now. Better way to put it.
I wouldn't lynch anybody right now. I don't have enough information about anybody. (Sory, I was confused. You said gun to my head, so I assumed you meant I was being lynched: who would I vengekill.)
But Elephant wants my reads, so here they are:
Roo: Town actually. He is answering questions at least which makes him seem so much better than in the other games.
Elephant Parade: Town. Good questions and observant.
Reverie: slight scum. Noticing a bit of tunneling on Temp Acc, and something about you just irks me. Not enough to warrent a vote yet.
Temp Acc: Neutral, not enough activity.
Origamisciengeguy: Who is this guy again?
After this, he continues to not ask anyone (except roo) anything, though he does respond to other people's posts.
This goes on until TempAcc's faux-lynch:
I think we should discuss a bit more. Sorry, I've been busy making up school work. What are the main arguments on TempAcc? I am town, so I know that at least 1 scum is voting for temp acc, so forgive my hesitation.
That's six days of tunnelling.
Six days. Yeah, you end up focusing on one person, sometimes, but that's pretty ridiculous. It might have gone on longer, too, if not for the faux-lynch.
So, this is going to end up coming down to me. I would like both of you to make your case against the other person and in defense about yourself.
If people had agreed with this, OSG wouldn't have had to do anything but make a judgement, and perhaps occasionally weigh in.
As for why I think being reactive makes OSG scummy:
- Town really, really wants to get new discussions going; as town, one should try to attack as many people and possibilities as possible.
- In my (admittedly very limited) experience, it's really hard to fake an entirely new train of thought. Reacting is much easier.
I'm also still pretty puzzled about the six-day tunnel. Rereading, he wasn't very active for the last couple of days, so it was more like a few-day tunnel followed by inactivity. That kinda contributes to the passivity/reactiveness thing, I guess, but it's not as suspicious as tunnelling someone for six days straight, which is what I thought he did.
Oh, and I missed this post because it was super short.
roo
You are getting mighty close to hammeing someone. Wouldn't want your scum buddy to "accidently" pull the trigger.
In general, vengeful games should not have a lynch without a clear consensus of the majority.
I mean, technically, it's both a reaction and a continuation of the tunnel, but it's also a pretty fair point.
Still, though.
OSG.
OSG: Why did you focus exclusively on roo for the first several days of the game?
After looking through the thread again, it seems possible that I'm making a mountain out of a molehill. Emphasis on
possible, though; and this isn't a real vote, anyway.
(Side note: OSG's actions make perfect sense as "mafioso attempting to gain towncred", but I'm hesitant to pursue that angle because I feel like a mafioso would be too nervous about attracting attention to do that kind of thing solely to gain towncred, and now I'm diving into WIFOM aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa