Select markers along the way...
One of the early black marks, but with wrong thoughts behind it:
I really don't want to go that far. I think you're too eager. No questioning of me, even?
Wait, FoU claimed the same ability I have.
But you seemed
less sure what you were, unfortunately.
It's obvious why the Evil role didnt kill again. For that reason, I suggest a No Lynch
Not obvious to me (or obvious to me why it was particularly obvious to you, I mean, nobody
else should be hinting Protect, right?). Was wondering if special-evil-wincon included 'infect and survive' qualities to max out points, personally. The first death an accident, perhaps even a Vigilante misaim (or infection-stopper?).
Let's see. We can start with a summary of our claims.
I: Tracker.
Moonlit: Tracker/Watcher with Protect action name.
TBF: Self-watcher.
Hector: DED, Voodoo Person.
Starver: The missing link. CLAIM.
Bouncer. Action is to Protect. As given. And I know example actly how many visitors I turn away.
And, by the way, nobody visited Fish on Night 1 (or tried to). Can't rule out a Hectorish non-visit action (which the target wouldn't know about), but again someone goes and says exactly the wrong thing and makes me suspect them more.
Fallacy, I trust you tried to visit Moonlit N3, but do not know for what purpose. Moonlit I trust you knew somehow what Fallacy did, N1,because it was a very lucky guess if you tried that. Fish, if you're right, its beyond my knowledge, and meanwhile someone did something to Hector (as Fallacy visited).
Someone's telling little grey lies and hiding the one telling the complete porkies. Or a complicated recruitment. (Let me remind you what Recruitment did when I did it, BTW, so consider your loyalties if that's the case.)
Unravel this, someone.
Speaks for itself... Also the whole of Moonlit's
http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=155932.msg7147650#msg7147650 is interesting in hindesight.
Day ends Wednesday, 4:00 PM PDT
Wednesday, 11:00 PM GMT
Anybody?
Fish and Moonlit are voting for each other, by my reckoning.
Fallacy is as likely to be trying to decide whether I'm guilty of something (if both of the others are honestly misguided). Sorry I blocked your checking of Moonlit, if that was so.
Without hidden-auto or personal victory end-conditions (which, if anybody has, Moonlit may have, but that's tenuous at best) I don't think, my vote will do anything, but I'm going to proclaim Fish for being more iffy than Moonlit, in various ways.
I think I was thoroughly drawn in the wrong direction(s) by this point.
I have asked Tomasque WTF is happening here, but haven't heard back yet. Can we hold off on lynching either of us until I've heard back one way or the other?
Too meta (I would have forced myself to ignore it) but I'd asked Tomasque to confirm
my targets (misremembered who I'd protected twice) and had had a response. Could have been that you were not actually asking at all, merely flailing. I don't know if I would have used this against you if you hadn't died, and I misthought that my vote was a '
very strong finger of suspicion' actually, not a killing-blow.