Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[FallacyofUrist]

For the record, I don't much like silencing.

[hector13]

You did have the ability to communicate, it just would've been awkward.

D1 start is awkward though.

[FallacyofUrist]

If there actually is a silencing ability this round, I'm going to be a tad bit irritated.

[hector13]

I don't think Tomasque would do the same schtick two rounds in a row.

Anyway, TBF has been quite quiet recently anyway.

We shouldn't waste the time we do have in waiting for TBF to post anyway.

Moonlit - if you were the investigator this round, who would you target at night and why?

Starver - what do you think of TBF's silence and FoU's constant worries over silencing actions?

FoU - Why are you wasting time worrying about actions and not taking the initiative and scum hunting?

[Starver]

Fish was last active "Today at 07:38:46" (my time) and that was before Moonlit's first post (12:35:51, ditto) so I see no sign of deliberate and/or enforced silence, yet...

Still, I'm impatient to get the discussion going.  Just in case Fish needs a prompt, Fish, but that's not meant to be serious (vote me, Fish, if that's all you can do*) and I'll revoke it ASAP. Also gives Tomasque the opportunity to bring out any relevent hidden auto regarding voting peculiarities straight away, if there is one at all...

AH n njaed...  But I'll post and double-post in response to whatever you're asking (will read in a moment),  Hector...


* I don't expect it to be a round mechanic in two sequential rounds, but maybe its because I don't expect it that it will be one...  Trying to outguess these Semi-Bastard mechanics each time is certainly interesting!!!

[Starver]

Starver - what do you think of TBF's silence and FoU's constant worries over silencing actions?

First part addressed, in parallel to your question.

Second part: Knowing my own frustrations in being silenced, two quick mentions (both following what were already essentially mine and then Moonlit's comments relating to the possibility of silence) do not a pattern make. Given my mention was because the prior round's situation was still at the forefont of my mind, I don't think them unnatural things to have said. Not statistically significant, yet. And even if it continues (or we never get another peep out of Fallacy?), I'm not sure how I would classify that.  Could as easily be a bluff, or double bluff or more. But hardly useful without corroborating evidence for whatever.

I'll be back with questions of my own shortly, I hope, but I've got other things to deal with first.

[TheBiggerFish]

Sorry guys, real life kept happening.

I'll catch up in a bit.

[TheBiggerFish]

Okay, there's not actually anything to catch up with.

[Starver]

Thought so. Unvote, as promised.

[TheBiggerFish]

So then.  Now that I'm here, any questions?

[Starver]

I like fruit. If you were a fruit, what kind of fruit would you be?

(And the same question to numbers two, three and four, please, Cilla...)

[hector13]

Surprise, surprise Starver. A rubbish question with a rubbish reference

That won't help us find scum.

Perhaps we should discuss the game:

TBF - what do you think the atypical day start means for what the Evil role's action is, and what it means for the town's action(s) against the Evil role?

[Starver]

Surprise, surprise Starver. A rubbish question with a rubbish reference

Don't you want to answer it, then?

That won't help us find scum.

Might do.

I'm perhaps a coconut (yes, that counts as a fruit).

[hector13]

I'm an apricot.

[Starver]

Drupes unite!

(Well, maybe...)