Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Starver]

I'd like to hear those ideas, if you don't mind.

The 'best' ideas were rather based towards you not wanting anyone to know about them (e.g. infecting/innoculating actions), and wanting to hide behind apparent ignorance would have been your best bet for doing what you do. But if you're wanting to discuss it, it cettainly isn't (unless through bluff?) your known effect...

Then we (further) enter territory where I don't want to give any more clues to a bad guy about what actions would be wisest for them. Frustrating, but as I'm heavily in a quagmire of confusion I'm not too concerned that I'm witholding solutions from Town, either.

@Hector, you are a investigator role, more like. It's a multi-investigator game, most certainly. I know I considered visiting you, but don't remember being explicitly asked to do so. I felt like I had to go elsewhere, though.

If you're right about yourself, I think the usefulness would have limited without other results first. I'm not sure I chose as well as I might, but there's likely a worse sequence.

[hector13]

Ah well.

Visit me tonight, big boy aye?

[TheDarkStar]

So everyone has claimed except Starver. I think that tells us something very important.

[Starver]

@Moonlit: if teh part I think yuo mean then that's alraedy in mind.

@TDS: Nope.

[TheBiggerFish]

....what the carp is going on here.

[hector13]

Moonlit hasn't claimed has he? Where are all the claims so far TDS?

[hector13]

Also, 2 hours left guys; if you can vouch for Starver, Moonlit, you don't want him lynched, methinks.

Unless one of them is neutral and the other scum.

Perhaps Teeds is the evil role, and all this blocking is so he can't be investigated... What say you to that, DarkStar?

I think we need a claim from Moonlit and Starver, please. The traditional 3 day limit means we can at least debunk fakeclaims on D3 with a full claim today.

[TheBiggerFish]

I have a mostly useless action, no investigative power, and little other information to work from.  Is it any surprise I'm not being much help?

[Starver]

...Fine.

I'm an Investigative role. I follow my target and see what they do that night. I am unroleblockable.

Starver's also an Investigative, and maybe something else. He sees his target.

TBF is being unhelpful, but Starver cleared him (unless me+Starver were deceived... could be...). He hasn't done much of anything...

@Starver, you sure about TBF?

Surer than at the start, although there's oddness in Fish's daytime talk that I'm hesitant about.  As in I thought I was wrong to be paranoid about being paranoud, but maybe I was wrong about being wrong and I was actually right to start with.

But, on balance, I think Fish is Ok. I have more 'verified' information about Fish than anyone else, including yourself, and I've got to stick with it until proven otherwise.  But there's no opposing info to definitely suggest a villain, from the rest of you. Just Fish is likely not to be (or playing a blinder, with fortuitously co-conspiring game setup). Even after considering the possoble combinations of both little white and great big black lies inevitably being spouted by at least one of our number.

[hector13]

I do believe the day ended 2 hours ago (Saturday 1pm PDT) so... I think Moonlit's TBF vote was late, and 3 posts of lateness too. I have been wrong before though so... bugger.

[Tomasque]

Round 13 - Night 2
 Another day passed and still nothing was found. No one asked the unspoken question, but everyone looked for the answer. Had they failed? Had the evil among them become undetectable? Was it even possible to succeed anymore? No one knew, and so they hoped. Perhaps that was all that was left to do.

[Tomasque]

Round 13 - Day 3
 The town was quiet. Only one thing mattered now.
Day ends Wednesday, 2:00 AM PDT
             Wednesday, 9:00 AM GMT

[Starver]

Right. That's my assumptions up the swanee. I was blocked. I was also poked. Which doesn't bode well for any of my theories, save that Fish does not block (which I think we already knew).

Someone needs to explain the block, which is now not around TDS.

[Starver]

Nuh-uh. TDS is the blocker, and he was the entire time.

I visited him last night. And he blocks everyone if he's visited.

I was not blocked N0, when Fish visited him (so its not an area effect triggered by any visit) and I was blocked last night when I didn't visit him (even if you did, it shouldn't have affected me if not an area affect). Also Fish poked Hector, N1, whilst I triggered/targetted TDS, making a ramped-up ability less than likely.

If TDS is sole (and singularly) blocking role, it must be a targettable, one way or another. Assuming no-one has heen lying, a 'protect block' was targetted over TDS, TDS again and then you, or a 'prevent block' over Fish, me and then me again.  This does not need to have been TDS except for the ready original claim.

Unless I'm very much mistaken (or Tomasque was!) there's multiple blocking skills. Perhaps one protect and one prevent, to go along with our (if I can trust you) different investigative abilities and/or whatever it is Fish actually does.

But there's some rather clever lying (or fortuitous abilities, hidden or otherwise) going on that has sent me down dead-end assumptions. I congratulate you, sir/madam, on your fortuitous pandering to my wild imaginations.

Has anyone else found it strange that there has been no kills?

Not given the variety of scumwin conditions in this marathon. Mislynches have been a major (if not the only!) mechanism in ensuring both evil and neutral wins, previously. Hence why I was looking to be sure, rather than lashing out wirh a lynch.

[Starver]

That doesn't parse, for me. I'll have to come back to it later.