Well... You haven't achieved your wincon yet.
Also the whole "true Special" doesn't stand up to Moonlit's flip
|
Weak (F and F) Weak
|
Special (Moonlit and Myself) Special
|
You
|
Potential symmetry, across the line down the 'and's and passing through outlier at the bottom. You could
claim a swap between Myself and You, or just appropriate that self-same text but from your own First Person Viewpoint, if you insist on deluding anyone left who is confused, of course...
The way I saw it, at a given hypothetical point before everyone tried to kill off the Weaks, probably because it seemed much easier and quicker to do, there was a possibility that the Weaks would be left alone and accepted as 'more possibly true than two "power" positions copying each other in archetype', and the remaining three would have been looked at more intensely but
possibly with the acceptance of there being two Specials.
Imagine, then, if there had been a successful attack upon Moonlit (entirely possible, had Moonlit not been able/willing to Cower, thus forcing us to consider the slaughter of the innocents that we actually pursued), then imagine what me-Special would be thinking...
I'm Special, Moonlit was proven Special, to go along with the two Weaks...
Aside from a "no Evils at all"
total Bastardy version of the game (with suitable Secret Autos meaning three Rock/Paper/Scissors-style complementary specials determining 'relative' Evils for everyone's Wincon, if not a Rock/Paper/Scissors/Lizard/Spock
five-way 'tournament of relative advantages'), my most logical personal observation would be that it was such a symmetry, with you the odd one out, and that's the position I'd need to consider defending and presenting as a possibility to the other two, so as not to lose against you, my clear enemy! (Unless there were actually three of us, Tomasque
really having thrown a curve.) And if we
hadn't managed to kill Moonlit (despite some of us trying, but thinking better of it the next day!), and there were questions about my seemingly unreliable skill...
It's *simples* logic! As Tomasque knows, from the way I have been explaining so many of my thoughts, every step of the way... (Really, pity poor Tomasque, for I must have nigh on filled up his My Messages inbox up, over the last few rounds, even not counting that 'Messages Only' round...)
Anyway I was, actually, expecting a Driver-type character, as per that other round, but in key functional ways you seem to be the
Anti-Driver. But with the twist that Moonlit is the Secret Co-Driver...