So who did you vote for yesterday, hector?
The answer was given thus:
I voted for Starver yesterday.
Just returned home, so a lot of what has been said over the last few hours still has to sink in.
From the earlier dialogue with you, to whit:
Everyone: did I vote for you?
Not that I know of...
Do you have any abilities beyond your inability to vote?
...I would have actually laid good odds on Hector having voted for you, but now suspects you of doing some vote-redirecting (and/or being subject to someone else's skills, by proxy). But it now looks like that isn't the tune after all.
Note that my limited knowledge (using Playback on Hector I just saw an image of someone else, which indicated me) hasn't yet helped. I don't have much in the way of context (daytime/night-time?) but Hector intending to be vote for/attacking me D1 would fit that bill. If indeed he had actually voted for me. And if my knowledge is even correct and not unreliable..! But Hector's statement arguably matches my original statement to a tee, under the right light. (Not the only explanation, but right now it's the simplest.)
(Also, it makes sense in a meta way... the number of times Hector has voted for me, for no reason...
)
It's hard to tell what else went on, though. A claim of "can't vote", two claims of "didn't vote", and a vote that apparently "didn't matter" (due to Special skill, apparently). But not included into that mix is the 'Strongman' role, if that's what it is, as claimed to have been the otherwise unknown attacker of one of our claimed Weaknesses.
And the 'Thief' is still (or else never was!) at large, even(/especially) if that's nothing to do with the 'Strongman'. That has the smell of a Neutral (reluctant as such a role might be to say so), somewhere in the mix, but I've got no solid evidence for such (save for the odd role distribution).
(There's still a chance that there's no Evil and just one or two antagonist Neutrals in its stead. Or even an all-Town complement with the aim of the game being to break down psychologically. But I'm not giving that more than a passing thought. I'd probably have designed such a game with a Secret Auto to randomly and unknowingly vote/attack at night if no conscious dayvote was made. But the claim of "Can't vote" would make for that being an
extremely weak Weak, rather than just the very weak one that it currently is claimed to be.)
(...but that last paragraph is again back into Meta territory.)