This is silly. My personal assessment is still that, generally, it's too close to call and that I have nothing good to vote with.
(Nobody even bothered to ask, but I'll say anyway: For Day 1 I could have voted an OMGUS for Hector, for a second vote-swap. Pointless to turn a three-way tie into a four-way tie, though it would be. Or else I could have voted for either Fallacy or Moonlit, breaking that vote-swap tie. But I assessed them both the same. Assessment: It'd have been little more than an indiscriminate kill, to have broken that tie when it was too close to call.)
I was only going to vote when I was more sure I knew who is sending us on this doomed journey. Originally I was erring between Fallacy and Moonlit (in the absence of Fish), but Fish now complicates that and Moonlit seems to have the only unopposed claim. Hector is too neutral (more boring-neutral than inconspicuous-neutral, if you'll excuse me for saying so). For my part, I know I've been quiet, but mostly that's been because I've been pondering more than I've been spouting.
Although I still don't want to aid the lynch of the wrong person, by my reckoning it's not so bad to do right now as if I'd lynched a person on Day 1. Something tells me that Hector's the best person to save, and while I remain dubious about Fish and still can't separate Moonlit and Fallacy on any other measure of doubt, the person threatening Hector is Fallacy, and my vote there will at least to stop Fallacy from snipe-switching back to Moonlit at the very last moment to further who-knows-what personal interests. My voting for Fish, instead, would mean nothing, so I'm forced to either break the tie or else effectively do nothing at all.)
For those that care, my current summary of thoughts is:
Hector: unknown, but with above-par vive
Fallacy: provisionally cleared by provisionally-Investigative Moonlit, but with doubts expressed about the skill
Fish: several doubts, but as inactive in votes as I previously was, so I'm not sure what other factors might be in play there...
Me: being not a very frequent a contributor, I know, but ever-thoughtful, rest-assured. Not that anybody cares.
Moonlit: Nobody has counter-claimed the role. A mis-vote for Moonlit could (when we know the proper role conditions) end up flipping a confirmation of my and Fallacy's innocence, but - even then - we'd have to decide between Hector and Fish and I still think Fallacy's on the wrong track so I don't want to have that problem.
So, a vote for Fallacy is the best of all actions, as far as I can see. Better than staying quiet and stewing about when the final day reveals something I could have perhaps stopped.