Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[TheBiggerFish]

I'm not sure there's blackmail.  That's just too many killy actions.

[FallacyofUrist]

It should be fairly obvious if the gun exists once the Moonlit Shadow uses it.

[TheBiggerFish]

Yes, that is definitely an obvious conclusion.

Especially considering that an investigator confirmed that the gun exists.

I'm really starting to get suspicious of you, though, FoU.

How do you know what you got if you throw it away without looking at it?

[hector13]

Yes, that is definitely an obvious conclusion.

Especially considering that an investigator confirmed that the gun exists.

I'm really starting to get suspicious of you, though, FoU.

How do you know what you got if you throw it away without looking at it?

Well... you being an as yet unconfirmed investigator kinda means that we can't be sure. Particularly given your initial "yeah no" when Moonlit mentioned it.

However, Moonlit also said the gun exists, so that's two folk who say it exists. You're the only one who mentioned the bomb, and FoU is the only one who mentioned the blackmail. Of the three, I'm inclined to believe the gun is real; less certain of the bomb. I think the blackmail is BS.

[TheBiggerFish]

The no gun thing was Tomasque messing up.

[hector13]

Fair enough. I guess Moonlit saying that too makes it likely...

Anyway, Moonlit. Thoughts on who you might shoot?

[TheBiggerFish]

All:Voting doesn't do snything anyway, just use red per usual in fakevote.

[TheBiggerFish]

Also confirming that I really don't trust FoU here.

[Starver]

@Starver: TBF's the one with the bomb, not Fallacy.

Yeah, I'm apparently already confused enough to have mistyped that.  (They're adjacent on my list, and my habit of rarely using the TLA nicknames makes me fall foul of the alliteration, also.)

So obviously take my confusion and move it over a person.  That's what I'll meant.  Consider this my EBWOP for that.  Either way, I'm not sure how helpful I'm being, yet.

[hector13]

I really don't want to shoot anyone, but it looks like we have to.

Can we fakevote with color?

I'm not guaranteeing anything, just want to see what people think.

Not TBF, we need his investigating. Fallacy probably no, he was really open about wanting to be shot in the beginning. Also shooting him does nothing.

You and Starver...? Y'know what, I'll shoot Starver. because of something he said earlier.

Haud yer horses, wee man

No need to make a rash decision. What makes you want to shoot Starver?

[FallacyofUrist]

How do you know what you got if you throw it away without looking at it?

*facepalm 2*
Orange glow for emphasis. And I never said I don't look at it.

Also shooting [Fallacy] does nothing.

*facepalm 3*
I throw away items I get. Unless a bullet traveling at a ridiculous speed counts as an item, it would still work on me.

Y'know what, I'll shoot Starver. [ color=transparent ]because of something he said earlier.[ /color ]

Invisible text revealed. I am a mighty wizard indeed. Why not just give the reason in the open, though?

I really don't want to shoot anyone, but it looks like we have to.
I'm not guaranteeing anything, just want to see what people think.
Not TBF, we need his investigating. Fallacy probably no, he was really open about wanting to be shot in the beginning. Also shooting him does nothing.
You and Starver...? Y'know what, I'll shoot Starver. because of something he said earlier.

Two things. Yellow glow for emphasis, and you didn't even consider hector in your analysis/list of shooting targets.

[hector13]

I really don't want to shoot anyone, but it looks like we have to.

Can we fakevote with color?

I'm not guaranteeing anything, just want to see what people think.

Not TBF, we need his investigating. Fallacy probably no, he was really open about wanting to be shot in the beginning. Also shooting him does nothing.

You and Starver...? Y'know what, I'll shoot Starver. because of something he said earlier.

Addendum to the above: wasn't expecting a lot of action when I asked, but the warning was necessary quickly before asking other stuff.

Why do you believe TBF's investigator claim?

Why do you think shooting FoU will do nothing?

PPE: probs too late. Smeg.

[FallacyofUrist]

Also, wow. Hector posted a second after me.

[hector13]

Bear in mind FoU could be gambiting scum, though that's something of a fallacy in how I'm thinking about it. No pun intended.

[Starver]

If you go back a few pages, you'll see that Starver said: I guess we just have to wait until someone does something random (or something similar). There's your random thing. Now, Starver, tell me why I shouldn't shoot you?

I think you're refering to "i.e., unless someone feels capable of adding more information, I think we're stuck and are left with the need to do something random to generate some new info.  I'm not sure how else to walk this issue through..." from
here.  The key word being "unless".  Someone's (probably several someones're) withholding information.

As to why not me, "I'll probably have a lead, later."  Perhaps my usual claim, but you'll admit I have had a reason to say this before.