Starver needs to offer his opinion on proceedings. Do you think anyone's claim is untrue? If so, why? Does it reveal anything about other players through proces of elimination?
Not that I'm sure that I'm the expert, here, but... ok:
As I read it, Fallacy so far has the best proof of themselves being as they say by the unusual interaction with Hector, and Hector has certainly has a viable proposal. (The person theoretically bounced-upon, by this art, might know to be true, but I'm not sure that person would be overly willing to confirm, if only because of legitimate paranoia.)
Because I'm (reasonably) sure of the above, I don't think there's any mileage in those two repeating Night 0's actions, as they were. Hector
should have the option of repeating the self-targeting choice, but equally anyone else. (The problem with 'bounce as protection' is that enemies may be unconcerned with
who their malevolent actions target. It can't even bounce back upon themselves.) Fallacy (obviously assuming there's opportunity) should equally-but-oppositely try to select someone
not selected by Hector, because another 'adjusted' result isn't going to help. Best to confirm in the morning of D2 that there's not been a clash, and then reveal?
TBF looks like a neutral/1-shot-vigish claim. If this is correct then there's no point to them (from Town perspective) while-soever unable to target the Evil, and only becomes useful once the Evil is identified. (Intriguingly sets up TBF/FoU as the perfect pair where you "sacrifice one to give the other time to do his job", without caring too much which way round this is. Except that I put more store in FoU as genuine than TBF, so there's
that distinction.)
Moonlit's suggestion to check TBF is against what I think is best (i.e.
suggesting an investigation), and later vote requested by FoU should be rendered totally non-binding. Which is not to say it might
not happen that way, but I don't see a value in targeting any particular individual, especially on request of another. And we also have a second possible pairing (Moonlit and TBF), one or both of whom might actually be misrepresenting/misunderstanding their skills (Protector of someone vs. somehow 'Targetting' the supposed Evildoer?) and actually are effectively allied Lovers. Whether or not they know they are. That's my opinion only, though. Which leads me onto...
...me!
Starver seems like the best option for a lynch, at this point, so I'll keep my vote where it is. Does Starver have anything to say regarding that? Perhaps someone else I should be wary about?
Nothing that I'd care to say about myself could ever be trusted, naturally but... I believe that there's a good chance that if I'm around tonight then tomorrow I might well have a more solid argument to suggest a Town win, at least. It would depend on who else does what else, naturally, so no promises. It could go to a third night, which would also suit (theoretically) TBF in his chance to give both the neutral and the town a win, or else FoU to get enough new information, likewise.
Based upon prior evil skills (delayed death-sentence,
avoidable death-sentence, recruitment and then pure trickery), I'm personally expecting more than a variation on the second round's theme. I suspect a misfired town/neutral skill. (I wouldn't want to suggest TBF's one-shot claim was a cover for "Honestly, it wasn't me! Not intentionally, anyway!" use of a non-1shot skill, of course.) Evil skills seem to be trending towards the non-violent and more manipulative end of the spectrum, so far, and I wouldn't put it past it being something more like an Evil Cupid, this time round. (Or in a future round... so look out for that!)
If you're genuinely interested in my opinion for today, though, I'd be most inclined to sacrifice TBF (to keep FoU) or TMS (as the least persuasive, to me, whether or not (or knowingly or not!) in a secret 'affair' that would kill A.N.Other). Not sure yet which I'd plump for, but for your consideration. Consider my words and we'll see where we go from there.
(I have, of course, now likely been unfriended by at least two people
Their own best choice of voting would be to support my own lynching (if they
know they're a pair) or perhaps taking a chance on the the other (if they don't know that to be true)...)