Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Starver]

Yeah...  not too sure Hitchhiker matches what I know.  Or maybe I just don't have the imagination of our Mod.  (Hmmm, yeah, it could work.  Ignoring some of the connotations.)

I think I'm minded to thinking that's a fake weakness for a real role. (Not necessarily scum! Could be legitimate camouflage!).  But that might just be me missing something.  What say you, @fallacy, @moonlit? Given Hector's already said something on the subject... not that I necessarily trust Hector yet, but if it's a fake point it's a logical fake point and I would admire that.

And I've was wondering the same as Fallacy.  Whatever insidious night-(s)kill the Scum has... No-one's saying anything, but does someone know?  Is it a recruitment?  (Are we to be hijacked by persuasion?)

[TheBiggerFish]

@Starver:You say you have something that doesn't make sense with my role?  Huh.

[FallacyofUrist]

This round is roasting my brain.
But in a different way than normal.
~~~
How is it roasting my brain? A lack of information. Thus far, it just seems like a somewhat normal mafia game with travel-based flavor.
The only publicly known special thing that's happened so far: TBF's boarding the car.
~~~
Maybe we could try lynching somebody? The Moonlit Shadow, I found some of your behavior suspicious yesterday.

[hector13]

That's not very specific, Fallacy. What about Moonlit's behaviour is/was suspicious? Specifically what makes it so suspicious you're willing to lynch them. Also why do you think the rest of us shouldn't consider it an OMGUS? (Moonlit was voting you day end yesterday)

On another note, have you ever seen the film "The Hitcher", TBF? The old one, with Rutger Hauer. Good movie. Also, the hitchhiker is the murderer.

[TheBiggerFish]

No I haven't.

Also, All: Why do you think the scum didn't nightkill?

I'm guessing it was to be able to cast suspicion on me, but that doesn't make sense given that I was in the game when night hit.

[hector13]

Well the scum hasn't been able to NK (directly) in any round. I had probably the most direct kill in the first game, which I wasted trying to be funny.

Analyzing the NK in any game is a road to WIFOM, though. Only the scum know why they killed (or not) someone, and they're not going to tell us until it doesn't matter.

[FallacyofUrist]

That's not very specific, Fallacy. What about Moonlit's behaviour is/was suspicious? Specifically what makes it so suspicious you're willing to lynch them. Also why do you think the rest of us shouldn't consider it an OMGUS? (Moonlit was voting you day end yesterday)

Because I was voting Moonlit first.

For instance, The Moonlit Shadow, here's a pressure vote for you.

See here.

And because I believe the reason Moonlit was voting me was to cause a no lynch/prevent his own lynch.
And because Moonlit voted me for a ridiculous reason.

Saying that it was a pressure vote... not sure how much experience Fallacy has but he's not new.
That decides it. Such a newbie move from someone with at least a good bit of experience. Fallacy

So yeah. All of that.

[hector13]

You also discussed flavour. Bad Moonlit

The chances of you being scum 3 times in a row are 125-1. Not infinitesimal odds.

Not sure why you accept TBF's claim. As I said, it benefits whichever alignment he is to come in late, so I find it hard to accept it's a weakness. Not enough for me to think he's scum though.

Anticipating the question: town benefit as we may have mislynched D1, but we get a replacement when he comes in. Scum benefits from missing out on a potential lynch and only having to survive 2 days instead of 3. Why do you trust him so much?

Anyway, you assume the Evil role did things Ns 0 and 1. Could quite easily be that they didn't act. They just need to wait the phases out, after all. You also assume the Evil role can't hide from your claimed ability to some extent (1-shots and the like) so... yeah. Do you get told anything if a non-Evil role acts while you're watching them?

What do you think of FoU saying your reason for voting him yesterday was ridiculous?

[TheBiggerFish]

Moonlit:Why do you say that?

[TheBiggerFish]

If I was scum, why didn't anything happen last night?

[TheBiggerFish]

...
Point, that, but why didn't anybody report any actions?

[TheBiggerFish]

...Point.  We do seem to be a lot more paranoid now.

[FallacyofUrist]

What do you think of FoU saying your reason for voting him yesterday was ridiculous?

I think you missed this question, Moonlit.

[hector13]

That's not very specific, Fallacy. What about Moonlit's behaviour is/was suspicious? Specifically what makes it so suspicious you're willing to lynch them. Also why do you think the rest of us shouldn't consider it an OMGUS? (Moonlit was voting you day end yesterday)

Because I was voting Moonlit first.

For instance, The Moonlit Shadow, here's a pressure vote for you.

See here.

And because I believe the reason Moonlit was voting me was to cause a no lynch/prevent his own lynch.
And because Moonlit voted me for a ridiculous reason.

Saying that it was a pressure vote... not sure how much experience Fallacy has but he's not new.
That decides it. Such a newbie move from someone with at least a good bit of experience. Fallacy

So yeah. All of that.

Fire away, Moonlit.

[hector13]

I quoted his reason. He thinks you voting him for a "newbie mistake" while being experienced is ridiculous.

What do you think of that?