Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Tomasque]

Tomasque:But...Whaaa?  Asking for role names is practically a standard thing!

Role names can be claimed. Only role flavor (ya know,  the itallic stuff) cannot be claimed.

[TheBiggerFish]

Tomasque:But...Whaaa?  Asking for role names is practically a standard thing!

Role names can be claimed. Only role flavor (ya know,  the itallic stuff) cannot be claimed.

Oh, okay.  Thank goodness.

I still don't like this.

It's flavour, it's meaningless. What will it tell you?

It was a big part of my suspicions of the Gas Station Attendant and Bad Pianist claims.

[TheBiggerFish]

But seriously, FoU, what's your role name?

[hector13]

It's flavour, it's meaningless. What will it tell you?

It was a big part of my suspicions of the Gas Station Attendant and Bad Pianist claims.
[/quote]

What about them?

Why are you so interested in the role name? What will it tell you about FoU?

[hector13]

It's flavour, it's meaningless. What will it tell you?

It was a big part of my suspicions of the Gas Station Attendant and Bad Pianist claims.

Better formatting for the quote.

[TheBiggerFish]

I don't know what it will tell me until I have it.

[FallacyofUrist]

What's the name of your role though?

The protective one.

You already have it.

[Starver]

But seriously, FoU, what's your role name?

Well, if we can discuss role-names (I must admit that I had my doubts from the original way it was put), then I don't need to try to forget what has already been revealed.  I mean, call me the rational one, but I think TBF doesn't know what I think I know about the veracity of FoU's claim - or anything similar that I might myself say.  It sounds like only one person wouldn't be able to work that one out, but I'm willing to be corrected.

I don't suppose Hector can say anything about this, just to be sure?

[Starver]

(I wish I'd typed that quicker.)

[hector13]

But seriously, FoU, what's your role name?

Well, if we can discuss role-names (I must admit that I had my doubts from the original way it was put), then I don't need to try to forget what has already been revealed.  I mean, call me the rational one, but I think TBF doesn't know what I think I know about the veracity of FoU's claim - or anything similar that I might myself say.  It sounds like only one person wouldn't be able to work that one out, but I'm willing to be corrected.

I don't suppose Hector can say anything about this, just to be sure?

Not really, FoU blocked me, so I wasn't able to do anything. Equally so, if it's a traditional jailor role, I was also protected from being acted upon, so... perhaps this throws Starver's claim they didn't act into question. The fact he's saying it's protective rather than a blocking role, though, is interesting. Makes him seem more benign, perhaps?

We can discuss role names and role abilities (presumably) which is somewhat more important than flavour, though given Tomasque's reluctance for us to discuss it (and the fact this is a bastard game) I think we could read into our own flavour beyond face value.

What is it you think you know about FoU's role, anyway?

[hector13]

Also, bear in mind we've got ~8.5 hours left.

[TheBiggerFish]

I see what you did there.

[hector13]

Ah... What did I do?

[FallacyofUrist]

I imagine the scum will try to use a kill action on me if the day ends without lynching them. Assuming I target another player at random, that's a 1 in 3 of preventing the kill action.

[hector13]

I imagine the scum will try to use a kill action on me if the day ends without lynching them. Assuming I target another player at random, that's a 1 in 3 of preventing the kill action.

Now that you've said that, they'll be thinking again. It's a nice thing for WIFOM for scum though, hope they enjoy it.

Also, not sure why no-one is actually voting. Won't get anything done by doing that. TBF