Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[hector13]

For your information, you were already voting me.
I imagine there will be more clues after a no lynch because of the following night actions and the many posts analyzable using new context from the previous day...

I know. I was confirming it. Also I like drama; it was a good way to end the sentence/post with some bite

Where is this "new context" coming from? As I said, there's no flip and we can't necessarily accept what anyone says as true/honest.

[FallacyofUrist]

Mutually exclusiveness. If two claims contradict... boom. One of the contradictors is hiding something.

[hector13]

Mutually exclusiveness. If two claims contradict... boom. One of the contradictors is hiding something.

This would work without a no-lynch, too. Where does the new context come from specifically regarding a no-lynch?

[FallacyofUrist]

Who wanted a no lynch... and who opposed it, for instance the scum who want the game to go faster...

[hector13]

Or the scum who wants the rest of the town to remain in the dark, though I can appreciate your not-so-subtle deflection.

[Starver]

For the sake of finding something useful to do, before day end, I'll vote Starver.

Because that's the only action I can make that doesn't feel like we're going round in circles...

[Starver]

(Sorry, I apparently didn't end-bold, properly.  Only the vote was supposed to be bolded, but I missed the /-bit of the close tag.  That last bit wasn't supposed to be a shout.)

[FallacyofUrist]

... Starver. Town never vote themselves.

[Starver]

a) Unless they're frustrated,
b) Unless they benefit themselves (and therefore the town) by it,
c) Unless they benefit the town (and therefore themselves) by it,
d) Unless they have to, or suffer a penalty,
e) ...maybe something I can't tell you.

One or more of the above may apply, but it's so nice that you've grabbed so quickly onto the opportunity to assume the worse.

[FallacyofUrist]

No, I don't know if you're a jester. I'm willing to risk it, however.

[hector13]

Just vote FoU, Starver. It's better than you dying, presumably. Play to win etc. etc.

[Starver]

As nothing definitively useful has happened today, from my perspective, I actually want to see what happens tonight, without reducing the options unduly.

Given the other vote for me and yours for FoU, voting Hector is the better option, and we'll see if there's any mess to sort out in the morning.

[FallacyofUrist]

Um... so basically, you're forcing a no lynch.
I... don't have much of a problem with that. An additional night will give us more time to act.

[hector13]

Starver

It's you or FoU. Unless TBF is being spectacular. I think it's FoU, but option 2 is acceptable too.

[Starver]

Well, I didn't expect that.  I was ready to clinch the evidence against FoU at the expense of my own sanity and go with that vote with surity.  The balance is still in that direction, but you definitely made it less certain so I might as well put that card on the table right now.

(I still want to know what happens to me tonight, but perhaps we'll never find out.)