Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

Yes

8 (72.7%)

No

3 (27.3%)

Total Members Voted: 11

Voting closed: February 02, 2016, 04:57:02 pm

[Romans]

Why did I get no fear this last turn by the way? Turn one i got fear back but not this one, I though about creating something and noticed.

[Demonic Spoon]

Can we use Fear to regain Life?

So I think piratejoe set up in a fastfood chain outlet? (White castle). If so, lol.

[Dustan Hache]

Some of these weaknesses are getting far too spesiffic. I mean really, antimatter? You're joking right?

[Demonic Spoon]

Some of these weaknesses are getting far too spesiffic. I mean really, antimatter? You're joking right?

Yeah I might change that.    Been trying to think of better alternatives but in a bit of a funk today.

[flazeo25]

holy blades

[Demonic Spoon]

holy blades

I want them to fight angels. Making them weak to the standard weapons of angels seems like a bad idea.

[tntey]

Some of these weaknesses are getting far too spesiffic. I mean really, antimatter? You're joking right?

I think I may need to put restrictions on resistance.

Question: does my Wyld Dominion passive work the moment I claim an area as mine?

Yeah

[Demonic Spoon]

Some of these weaknesses are getting far too spesiffic. I mean really, antimatter? You're joking right?

I think I may need to put restrictions on resistance.

I've changed it up. I agree antimatter wasn't really a good choice. I wrote that way too early in the morning.

EDIT: Been trying to stay away from too exotic physics and chemical stuff but slipped up this morning basically.

[Demonic Spoon]

Some of these weaknesses are getting far too spesiffic. I mean really, antimatter? You're joking right?

I think I may need to put restrictions on resistance.

I've changed it up. I agree antimatter wasn't really a good choice. I wrote that way too early in the morning.

EDIT: Been trying to stay away from too exotic physics and chemical stuff but slipped up this morning basically.

((Alright! New rule, weaknesses can't be
 A weakness to a food
 A weakness to an animal
 A weakness to a plant
 ))

Uh? I thought vampire style weaknesses (garlic) would be fine. I mean. Horrors can teleport as a free action. Nothing stopping someone from teleporting to the bottom of the ocean, catching some octopi, and wrecking my shit. The actual problem is choosing materials with such ridiculous containment requirements or short halflifes that using it as a weapon is way less practical than just overpowering the target with brute force.

This seems like the opposite of helping.

With these new rules I'm likely to make all my stuff weak to [antimatter] [nuclear explosions] and various materials that can only be made in laboratories and only exist for a few minutes/seconds.

[tntey]

Some of these weaknesses are getting far too spesiffic. I mean really, antimatter? You're joking right?

I think I may need to put restrictions on resistance.

I've changed it up. I agree antimatter wasn't really a good choice. I wrote that way too early in the morning.

EDIT: Been trying to stay away from too exotic physics and chemical stuff but slipped up this morning basically.

((Alright! New rule, weaknesses can't be
 A weakness to a food
 A weakness to an animal
 A weakness to a plant
 ))

Uh? I thought vampire style weaknesses (garlic) would be fine. I mean. Horrors can teleport as a free action. Nothing stopping someone from teleporting to the bottom of the ocean, catching some octopi, and wrecking my shit. The actual problem is choosing materials with such ridiculous containment requirements or short halflifes that using it as a weapon is less practical than just overpowering the target with brute force.

This seems like the opposite of helping.

With these new rules I'm likely to make all my stuff weak to [antimatter] [nuclear explosions] and various materials that can only be made in laboratories and only exist for a few minutes/seconds.

Don't abuse the system, you can't make it so things are only weak to things that no one could possibly have.

[Demonic Spoon]

Don't abuse the system, you can't make it so things are only weak to things that no one could possibly have.

That was kind of my point. I wasn't abusing the system, I've been trying to generally make it so that acquiring at least one or two of the weaknesses of my creations is hard, but very much possible. And following the logic that the rarer something is, the more lethal it is as a weakness (working at range with just smell etc.) The new rule don't prevent abuses in the system (abuses it doesn't prevent or even adress is what I was pointing out), they just cut off legitimate uses and is honestly kind of annoying since I enjoy the flavour of making my creatures weak to various herbs and animals. "To defeat the dread spider armies you must dive to the bottom of the ocean and retrieve the volcano octopus!"

Question: What happens to creations already made with resistances that are now forbidden?

[Dustan Hache]

I suppose you would have to re-map them, so as to make their weaknesses more accessible/reasonable to the GM.

[Demonic Spoon]

I suppose you would have to re-map them, so as to make their weaknesses more accessible/reasonable to the GM.

>_<

[tntey]

I suppose you would have to re-map them, so as to make their weaknesses more accessible/reasonable to the GM.

>_<

You don't though. Just keep in mind the rules for future creation. Also for your spidsr weaknesses, would magma = fire?

[Demonic Spoon]

I suppose you would have to re-map them, so as to make their weaknesses more accessible/reasonable to the GM.

>_<

You don't though. Just keep in mind the rules for future creation. Also for your spidsr weaknesses, would magma = fire?

I still need to change stuff if I want to keep making my old creations in the future. It remains just as annoying.

I would prefer a specific weakness to magma rather than a general weakness to fire if that's okay.