I'm a pseudodactylectual
You claim to have fingered people, when you really haven't?
...yeah, fair enough, I've known folks like that.
I need to learn to stop talking.
Another babbler? I feel ya, man.
Yeah I have a habit of spewing facts constantly about everything. I'm a pseudointellectual.
I was at a little gathering (trying to explain the familial relation would just confuse matters, so I'll leave it alone) back in early fall of last year, and I was chatting a bit with the hostess about various topics. I also have a tendency to remember Fun Facts about all sorts of random things, and this was making itself rather evident.
Then the hostess hit me with a big question; is it meaningful to accumulate knowledge that is not specifically related to one's trade/hobbies?
She made the argument that to pursue and devote time and thought towards "inconsequential" knowledge was a waste of resources, and unnecessary.
It kinda took me back a bit. I mean, I've met plenty of people who don't have the same curiosity and general "flypaper-mind" configuration that I do, but I have never heard someone specifically argue that it's "wrong" to pick up information that can't be actively applied to one's field(s).
It was a viewpoint so alien I couldn't even really grasp it. Sure, it's one thing to say that it's
better to focus on applicable knowledge than to wander off into trivia, but to say that it's preferable to
not possess knowledge than to possess "useless" knowledge? The whole concept struck me as anathema.