For the current page, I'm assuming you're talking about the research that people were previously discussing which shows men have confirmation bias. But to make that argument, you need to basically ignore identical research which shows that women also suffer from confirmation bias in a similar amount. Sure, you could say that you think the women are more right than the men, but that's no longer an objective statement based on the evidence of the research - your injecting an opinion analysis into it and outright rejecting half the data because it doesn't fit what you believe.
So we have articles pointing out that men are more critical of research articles they don't agree with, but those same articles omit to mention equivalent research showing women aren't any different. In fact, the article-writers are themselves taking sides and ignoring research which they're not happy with.
It doesn't even matter which side I agree with, but using confirmation bias itself (ignoring research you don't agree with) to make an argument about other people having confirmation bias is pretty silly. I never said anyone here did that, but the people who wrote those articles definitely did that.