Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[hector13]

I'm not. I was letting you know where I thought he was coming from.

You are being very defensive though, if you want me to assign a scumtell to you.

I'll In as replacement

however, do note that I may not be as active as other times due to my broken arm 

You will be forced to post at least 4 contentful posts/day if you are installed in any of the spots.

[origamiscienceguy]

I'm not. I was letting you know where I thought he was coming from.

You are being very defensive though, if you want me to assign a scumtell to you.

I'll In as replacement

however, do note that I may not be as active as other times due to my broken arm 

You will be forced to post at least 4 contentful posts/day if you are installed in any of the spots.

shouldn't be an issue.

[Deus Asmoth]

I see. I put an 'it' in where there wasn't one. My bad.

[hector13]

Jwoodward's response:

Whoa, sorry, got the prod. What's going on?

(BTW, not a lurker. Someone with a RL is more like it.)

and that has been it.

Moonlit: If you can direct me to when you asked me why I was voting for Tawa, I'll answer.

[TheDarkStar]

TDS! I do believe the day is s'posed to end on Thursday, rather than Wednesday.

Corrections have been made; thanks for noticing this.

[hector13]

No edits in mafia?

I guess I should've said the day is extended 48hrs rather than 24 (at least that's what it looked like you did) instead... sorry.

[TheDarkStar]

OSG you may be needed. Everyone did TDS prod the lurker guy whose name starts wit a j? jwood something? What came of it?

He was prodded and his last post was 48 hours ago. Incidentally, it's time to prod him again. In addition, O. Wilde will be prodded.

[hector13]

It's a bit naff when all but one of the newer players in a BM game need to be prodded incessantly.

[Tawa]

Tawarochir thinks forcing an extension might be a scumtell, but I think I've spent enough energy on this.

Not what I said. I said that they might try to prolong RVS, not prolong Day 1. Day 1 =/= RVS. It is possible (if tricky) to get good leads on D1. RVS is what happens before there's any leads. Ergo, scum could try to convince people to abandon good leads and look into false ones.
Ack, sorry for my inactivity. I keep forgetting to check this. :v

[O.Wilde]

Sorry for not posting recently, I've been reading along and the last few absolutely massive walls of text kinda threw me. I'm rereading now.

[Deus Asmoth]

You don't need to post a thesis or anything. Even just your thoughts on stuff helps give people a better idea of where you're at.

[O.Wilde]

Seriously fillipk, your arguments against me are becoming as weak as my arguments against you.

If we're honestly to the point you're admitting that your arguments are weak enough so as to have no merit, why are you still pursuing them? If you honestly can't come up with a strong case even after nearly 10 pages of discussion, why not move on?

Spoiler: Heydude6 Quotes (click to show/hide)

When I asked you some questions before, you addressed them is several pretty bad ways (such as the OMGUS for example).

Anyway, due to ninjas I want to clarify that I am currently addressing the fillipk post that came before the one that he posted in reply to hector.

It was never an OMGUS, you admitted it yourself that you twisted the meaning of my sentence and moonlit agreed, I simply pointed it out saying that we should pay more attention to you too, it was never a vote, just a warning.

You think I'm talking about this:

At what point did I ever express a desire to kill him, I say we need to look more carefully at these two as they are twisting my words, or just assuming my vote means more then it actually does.

When I'm talking about this:

Let me get one thing straight, the only reason you are voting for me is because you misinterpreted what I said and thought I actually meant my vote, and you admit this yet you are still voting for me.  Unvote,

Heydude6 you admitted that you see TheMoonlitShadow as suspicious because he bandwagon'd me for the exact same reasons you did, a vote, a vote in the first post of the game, where there is no possible way for me to know anything about anyone at all, what evidence do you have besides a misunderstanding of my posts.

Perhaps this may feel unfair but the definition of OMGUS is simply:

OMGUSing: Short for Oh My God You Suck, by the way. Voting or otherwise applying pressure to whoever's voting you.

Maybe you find this definition too general, but it's the one quoted from the OP. It also didn't help that you were deliberatly avoiding a question and instead chose to attack me.

Aren't OMGUS situations basically bound to happen? I think you (heydude6) might be holding the 'possible scumtell' list a bit too high and mighty. I mean, if we're gonna be horribly technical about it, ever since fillipk voted you, your entire case against him has been a prolonged OMGUS. The vote isn't part of that, but the point of the case is applying pressure, which falls under the definition you used. Just because something can be a scumtell in certain situations doesn't mean it always is. In this case, I think it's a case of new town trying to save their ass.

Anyway, If I was mafia and I was defending Roo because he's my scum buddy, then shouldn't you act on that? Surely if I was mafia, I would know that Roo/hector was an innocent town and defend my actual scum buddy rather than risk my life for the enemy. If what you're saying is true then Hector must also be scum.

Why bring up Hector at all in this? Are you trying to get close to him in case you're lynched and turn out to be scum? Give us another target? Plus, if you were mafia, you would be able to reason that defending your actual buddy may be a poor move in case they're lynched and suspicion is cast on you. In addition, if the person you defend is lynched and happens to be town, that casts you in a more townly light. It's circular logic that entirely depends on your own mafia play style which we obviously don't know.

Hector, please don't play dumb on me. If I asked Tawa about your vote, do you honestly think you shouldn't explain yourself? I mean, you quoted me yourself.

So, you're voting Hector for not responding to a question you never actually asked him? This isn't some passive aggressive facebook post like 'Someone is so fucking dead omg  ps. u kno who u r' It's mafia. If you want an question answered then ask it directly. Don't vaguely allude to it and then get mad when people don't take you seriously. I agree with hector on this (I mean, if he said anything else half the damn thread would probably scream OMGUS but...) What's with the active lurking, and do YOU honestly think that's a good way to get someone to explain themselves?

[hector13]

Moonlit: Aye, question wasn't directed at me. How am I avoiding answering a question you never actually asked me?

It's funny how you've brought up that I didn't explain my vote before (here and what you just quoted) yet don't actually demand I explain myself until I point out you're active lurking. Touched a nerve, perhaps?

PPE: Ninja'd

[O.Wilde]

Moonlit: Aye, question wasn't directed at me. How am I avoiding answering a question you never actually asked me?

It's funny how you've brought up that I didn't explain my vote before (here and what you just quoted) yet don't actually demand I explain myself until I point out you're active lurking. Touched a nerve, perhaps?

PPE: Ninja'd

Having just also defended your honor I do feel the slightest of compulsion to ask that you actually answer the question Moonlit implied. Why are you still voting for Tawa?

[hector13]

RVS, with a little bit of roo channeled into it.

I would have thought that it coming in my first post would've made that obvious, arguably aided by me lamenting roo wasn't playing in the first sentence, but apparently not.