So yeah. Even if it's not technically paedophilia because the girl in primce Andrew's case wasn't a 14-year-old (and I have no idea what age the girl in question was, I'm just assuming here) you're still coming off as trying to cover up the fact that he solicited sex from a minor behind a curtain of "but it's not the exact worst case scenario Epstein was accused of you guys" seems like a perty weak defense.
Bearing in mind there was not just 1 girl, Epstein was running a whole ring with at least 80 girls, usually age 12-14. Epstein was also in the business of filming his friends having sex with children so as to have blackmail material on them later. To have the blackmail hold legal teeth on Prince Andrew the girls would have to at least be younger than 16. Pity Epstein died when he did, there's so much more we don't know yet.
Neat breakdown of Andrew's trainwreck of an interview where he stumbles over his own lies. He's accused of having sex with eight girls, one of which who has come forward publicly to say she was trafficked into sex. We also know Andrew visited Epstein by his own admission at least 3 times a year, and continued to stay at his mansion for week long stays
after he knew Epstein was convicted of a lesser charge (prostitution) to his known crimes (sex with minors, human trafficking), supposedly to tell Epstein face to face that they could not associate with one another any longer.
Now you obviously don't want to shout fire just because there's smoke, but that's a shit ton of smoke with some embers and heat coming out the oven. We can pray that this'll bleed over onto Trump and Clinton