He must have seen it in the 30 seconds before I went "oh right, Wales" and edited it xD
Either way, was just trying to make the point that history has value regardless as to whether the beliefs and practices of the people who lived it are active or predominant.
To clarify as well: I'm not saying that traditions can't have value, but that I don't regard being a tradition as a value in itself. And people have no obligation to work to preserve them just for being traditions.
I go to the pub because I enjoy it. I go with friends because we enjoy it. If I made a new friend I'd probably try and take them to the pub. If they enjoy it then we'll probably keep going to the pub. No where in there does "going to the pub" need to be done "because it's traditional" and if I stopped enjoying it I wouldn't keep taking new friends to the pub just "because it's traditional". And if everyone in the country but me stopped enjoying pubs, then they have no obligation to work to keep people going to the pub for the sake of tradition and I'd have no right to go around dragging people into empty pubs, though I could still ask nicely. Ultimately, that there was a tradition of going to the pub is just an emergent property of multiple people enjoying going to the pub.
That is the distinction to me between finding value in a tradition, and finding tradition to be a value.
By all means carry on your traditions*, but don't begrudge others if they no longer find value in your particular set of traditions or have different ones.
* standard disclaimer: so long as they don't infringe the rights of others, duh.