Ah yes, it is of course vitally important to reject any overweight people from being allowed to honour the memory of the dead. Only fit and healthy people should be permitted to show respect for their heritage and the fallen, and everyone else should be thrown out and alienated. This is totally a good thing which will not drain the ever-shrinking pools of people willing to dedicate their time to the past for free, or contribute to a lack of pride in their country which is the sort of thing you’re usually up in arms over dirty europoor youth too busy with halo to care about their nation
I do not care for the most shallow pride in one's country, the idiotic patriotism which tells you that you are exceptional for being a part of it, even if your only contribution to it has been to keep an artificially preserved party alive. Needless to say, when I endorse keeping a nation close to the heart, a McNation Meal clogged in the heart is not my intention. Everyone is allowed to honour the memory of the dead, the Netherlands is no different from the UK in keeping its memorial services open when terrorist season has died down. These folk are not protesting access to the memorial service, they are protesting rejection from the honourary guard. I do not know how much this honourary guard differs from an honour guard, but considering you traditionally send your most elite and well-drilled units to the honour guard, I believe the WWII memorial committee, even with its much lower standards - has its limits.
If they have a sincere and solemn reverence for their ancestors, they will still be there, either as catering staff or participant. If the only thing keeping them there was a desire to parade in uniform, no love has been lost. If they sincerely believed the only way to honour their ancestors was through parade, then they will choose temperance and fast past the sunday roast, rather than miss out on next year's service. There is nothing surprising in, nor is there any reason to condemn the public who are disinterested in, a nation they have no reasons to take pride in. While you and I may disagree, my viewpoint is such that I would much rather have a smaller group of people who actually care over a disinterested mass of many whose only focus is how the event looks upon them. Thus from my point of view, those arbiters of greater fulfillment who continually relax their standards to draw in mass appeal, will find they follow the path of commercialized Church in finding neither: hollowing their every principle, standard and meaning to appeal to people disinterested in their doctrines, leaving behind a cosmopolitan cafe disinteresting to a genuine congregation, leaving behind a decrepit waste followed by no one.
Basically I am of the opinion that if you must bribe your own ever-shrinking pool of people into honouring their dead, it is much better to let dead thing lie, as you are at that point just pretending to still value the morality you discarded long ago. Much better to instead focus on cultivating the future, so that one day people will again care for everything.