Jesus, that could be bad.
The reduction in seats isn't an issue. Nor is proportional representation, but moving to evaluation's not that great.
Macaron, you were supposed to destroy the authoritarians, not join them!
It's not entirely clear what he means by that.
From what I gathered from
here:
-Limit benefits to MP, ban them from working as consultants during their term, ban them from hiring family members, limit them to three consecutive terms, ban people with a criminal records from competing in elections.
-Make the "accelerated procedure" standard. Right now, a law can ping back and forth between the upper and lower houses as amendments are added and added and added (Adding amendment is the French equivalent of the filibuster. The absolute record being the 137 537 amendments proposed by the socialists and communists to block energy liberalization in 2006). The accelerated procedure exist already, and basically has a joint commission draft a compromise, which is then offered to the lower house which can either accept it, accept its last version, or turn it down, but cannot amend it. I'm not 100% sure what that imply as I'm no expert.
-Have the deputies spend part of the year voting new law, and part of the year evaluating existing law and amend it. No idea what that would mean in practice.
-Implement a "dose of proportionality" in the election system. That's the satisfy his MoDem allies, who really like proportionnal because they're the eternal third place party (think LibDem, except more useless).
-Introduce yearly "State-of-the-union" style speeches.
-Lower public subsidies for political parties who don't have a balanced gender ratio among their candidates.
-Create "innovative ways to evaluate the legislative and parlementary work by citizen participation", which, as far as I can tell, is a stimulus program for the buzzword industry.