Well, yes, it was not unexpected, and I could not bear giving the enemy the satisfaction of knowing that I would give up the first days of spring for their sake. I believe that the public thought and felt the same, over-all.
As for flags, I do agree. It is true that they are, indeed, just coloured fabric, but it is what they represent that matters. It is more than just mere fabric, it is a symbol. As such, it should be held in respect. I believe it is the same for all flags. I have, for instance, seen Irish flags used for table-cloths for St. Patrick's Day. While the intention is pleasant (a good party, and to celebrate the saint and Ireland as a whole), I believe it is a frightful faux pas.
I can understand why some people do link nation flags to racism and jingoism. But, it is an assumtion, an underdeveloped path of logic that ought to be challenged. It is the symbol of the nation. To then project the impression on to it that it is a symbol of racism and oppression and hate-crime, just at the mere sight of it, is just the same action as that of those who project the impression that it means racial purity, dominance and the freedom to repress and destroy all those who does not fit within it. Developing a healthy relationship to one's native land is very important, for it means more than merely the colour of the passport jacket. Neglecting this, and developing an unreasonable phobia to its colours, is as damaging as developing a twisted relationship to it that is built on violence, hatred and dreams of an impossible purity.
The flag-phobia seems to have begun to lessen, however. No doubt due to a change in the public zeitgeist. When tried and tested, I do believe that the idea of the nation-state stands firmer than it appeared, and it and its symbols might return in from the cold.
There is, of course, always the option to reject it. However, it would appear that a large portion of those who would reject the nation-state, its symbols and its duties, are very eager to make use of its benefits...