It's ok, the rest of the EU will get to veto UK's trade deals for years to come in retaliation. Not that it has much to gain, certainly not a few % of GDP in free trade that will get destroyed by tarrifs or several hundred of thousands of bankers that will move from the City to the mainland when they lose their access to the single market. I'm sure the bankers will be welcomed with open arms, unlike those other (economical) refugees.
>veto trade deals with yurop
>how will this hurt yurop
lmao napoleon couldn't do it with an army, how will the EU do it without
Dunno what the fuss is about tbh, UK is already part of the EU Battlegroup rotation and if I'm not mistaken had forces under command of the EU Council in the not so distant past.
NATO's HQ is in Brussels
We only need to put the Yurop HQ next door to get this rivalry going with full popcorn in tow
Don't worry, LW is completely unironical to the point of bitter reactionism.
My price is one million keks
Ah it's corporatist, just like the rest of the capitalist world then?
You can see why lots of people across the capitalist world are discontent then
It's a bit of a running theme
If I'm not mistaken there is a lobbyist running for office of party leader of the main opposition party in the UK right now and I wonder what Cameron will do next.
Owen Smith is a Blairite lobbyist
Do you know how toxic that brand is
In the UK, Tony Blair is noteworthy for making the EU stronger, causing multiculturalism, causing multiculturalism to then fail, entering the UK into the Iraq war over lies, becoming peace ambassador of the middle east after blowing it up, killing socialism and replacing it with neoliberalism, killing neoliberalism and allowing socialists back in e.t.c.
In short, Owen Smith has no chance of defeating Corbyn and has said he will never return to the shadow cabinet once he loses lol,
Corbyn's support IS OVERWHELMING whilst Owen Smith is nobody
Cameron's a useless sod and I'm glad he's gone too, really the one you've got to watch out for is Osborne, who has announced he intends to snake his way back into power somehow
And what do you think the trade deals that the UK is scrambling to form will look like?
There's this thing called free trade the EU really should try out some timeAlso in other news, rather than saving those EU membership costs to fund the NHS, let's just fire those firefighters instead: http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-manchester-37408975
The manchester fire service is funded with council taxes from manchester and this is the result of union-chairman power play
"To start the process for dismissing firefighters to then simply re-engage them on an un-negotiated contract is really appalling, and a serious breach of the agreed mechanisms for industrial relations in the UK fire and rescue service."
"This is the third change to shift systems in Greater Manchester since 2006 - surely firefighters are entitled to some sort of stability in their working lives?"
David Acton, chairman of Greater Manchester Fire and Rescue Authority (GMRA), said in a statement: "We have developed a new shift duty system for firefighters which changes from a day shift of 10 and a half hours and a night shift of 13 and a half hours to two equal shifts of 12 hours.
He wants his workers to lose the protection of their current negotiated contract to work under the third shift change cos:
- 1. He's a wanker (unlikely, but possible)
- 2. Manchester was the only city in the UK where tax revenues haven't grown nearly as much as other cities
Smaller cities have seen larger increases in their tax take but big cities remain crucial. London aside, tax revenues generated in small and medium sized cities have grown more quickly than in larger cities. However, Manchester, where tax receipts grew by only 1 per cent over the decade, added only slightly less tax into the national pot over that period than the 10 fastest growing small and medium sized cities combined.
I'm not too bothered with the NHS cos the neoliberals are out of power and can't privatise it anymore, though it remains to be seen what May will do in regards to funding. Personally the reason why I'm not too bothered is because seeing it as an issue of just increasing funding is a strategy doomed to failure, as a fat nation's public health bill is unaffordable no matter how much borrowing you conduct,
and obese/smoking patients will increasingly have to pay the price of their own lifestyle. It would be much more cost effective funding preventative measures and regulation and such, the sugar tax was a great step in that direction (when fighting lobbying giants like coca cola, you need to strangle them to death by eating their money)
but delays like this cause me to be demoralized. If they truly bow to lobbyists here, then it will be time to put the pressure on even further come election