Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 46 47 [48] 49 50 ... 73

Author Topic: Flabort's High Powered Bring Your Own Role 2: Game Over: EVERYONE WINS!  (Read 107817 times)

hector13

  • Bay Watcher
  • It’s shite being Scottish
    • View Profile
Re: Flabort's High Powered Bring Your Own Role 2: Day 4: Expanded Roster
« Reply #705 on: February 27, 2016, 11:06:49 pm »

Ragshake was lynched actually. OSG was banished (presumably; he has been removed from the game)
Logged
Look, we need to raise a psychopath who will murder God, we have no time to be spending on cooking.

the way your fingertips plant meaningless soliloquies makes me think you are the true evil among us.

Deus Asmoth

  • Bay Watcher
  • Bland, but sensible.
    • View Profile
Re: Flabort's High Powered Bring Your Own Role 2: Day 4: Expanded Roster
« Reply #706 on: February 27, 2016, 11:56:17 pm »

I can't daykill Shakerag. I already tried to use my kill and someone blocked it.
Logged
Look elsewhere, reader. There is nothing for you here.

Tiruin

  • Bay Watcher
  • Life is too short for worries
    • View Profile
Re: Flabort's High Powered Bring Your Own Role 2: Day 4: Expanded Roster
« Reply #707 on: February 28, 2016, 12:03:45 am »

I can't daykill Shakerag. I already tried to use my kill and someone blocked it.
There was no EVENT! unlike the rest of us who actually did our actions :P
Who did you target it to? [An whai?]

Ragshake was lynched actually. OSG was banished (presumably; he has been removed from the game)
...Well there goes a big paragraph out of my post :V
Do you however know your real alignment if you were not Outsider-Role'd [since it seems very much tied to the role that you have?]
Logged

4maskwolf

  • Bay Watcher
  • 4mask always angle, do figure theirs!
    • View Profile
Re: Flabort's High Powered Bring Your Own Role 2: Day 4: Expanded Roster
« Reply #708 on: February 28, 2016, 08:33:16 pm »

Still waiting on the post :P

TheDarkStar

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Flabort's High Powered Bring Your Own Role 2: Day 4: Expanded Roster
« Reply #709 on: February 28, 2016, 10:11:09 pm »

TDS Could you have been more clearer? I've scanned the deaths in the night thus far and I feel like a hypothesis comes to me--that significant note of yours has been the reason ALL kill-type actions have failed [ie Mine and Tawarochir's] that was after FallacyOfUrist's Death which had an auto that MADE kills be unblockable (20% chance of error). Linking it to your attitude thus far, you've been very lackluster in scumhunting, and you haven't come forward in details into your action claims. This coincides with my request to DA for confirmation--DA must act and make his daykill to give credence to this since I DOUBT that two people could've been roleblocked into day-kill-acting.

I have sent Flabort a query as to DA's ability to daykill. This can be reconfirmed by Teneb [if he isn't scum :V]

Everyone We have an accountable number of unspoken incidences, one of which (since I'm not yet done MANUALLY drifting through the thread since ALL lurkertrackers/posttrackers are broken :'( ) is this significant note. It has Ragshake's poke, but we can confirm that Ragshake wasn't the one who did all that MASS VOTE REDIRECT and TMS hasn't noted any information about doing that himself//knowing anyone doing that to him. [Either/or, accounting for all possible scenarios here].

Unless every kill this game has targeted me, I am not the one preventing the kills.

Deus Asmoth: You can give people infractions, correct? How many can you give at a time?
Logged
Don't die; it's bad for your health!

it happened it happened it happen im so hyped to actually get attacked now

Tiruin

  • Bay Watcher
  • Life is too short for worries
    • View Profile
Re: Flabort's High Powered Bring Your Own Role 2: Day 4: Expanded Roster
« Reply #710 on: February 28, 2016, 11:51:37 pm »

Still waiting on the post :P
The most horrible thing about having unstable internet (at home) is to think that you sent in a HUEG post and then coming back on a more-stable internet and then seeing NUP, no post.

Add that and all my notes being on my laptop at home = >_>

Deus Asmoth: You can give people infractions, correct? How many can you give at a time?
DA wasn't the one, and I believe the one giving the infractions did not claim their role :O
...Are you updated with the thread, TDS?
Logged

Deus Asmoth

  • Bay Watcher
  • Bland, but sensible.
    • View Profile
Re: Flabort's High Powered Bring Your Own Role 2: Day 4: Expanded Roster
« Reply #711 on: February 29, 2016, 04:17:29 am »

TDS, four shall be the number I shall give, and the number I shall give shall be four. Five I shall not give, nor three excepting that I proceed directly to four. Six is right out.

Tiruin, I wanted to kill TMS in the hopes that he'd get replaced by someone a little bit less non-sensical. Presumably there was no event because the action didn't resolve (and whoever has been handing out infractions hasn't been triggering events, so not every action causes one).
Logged
Look elsewhere, reader. There is nothing for you here.

Deus Asmoth

  • Bay Watcher
  • Bland, but sensible.
    • View Profile
Re: Flabort's High Powered Bring Your Own Role 2: Day 4: Expanded Roster
« Reply #712 on: February 29, 2016, 04:34:16 am »

Also, I've mentioned before that I can disable autos that make people unkillable. Does anyone think that it would be worth killing TDS tonight (bearing in mind that NQT's role is still in effect)?
Logged
Look elsewhere, reader. There is nothing for you here.

Shakerag

  • Bay Watcher
  • Just here for the schadenfreude.
    • View Profile
Re: Flabort's High Powered Bring Your Own Role 2: Day 4: Expanded Roster
« Reply #713 on: February 29, 2016, 10:13:35 am »

hector13:
'cause I think nobody would be interested in doing it, seeing as Ragshake is already dead.

Ragshake wins whether he's dead or not, and I can't win while he's in the game. *shrug*

If I had another role, I'd be working toward that. But I don't. Ah well.

Anyone wana do it anyway?
Well, if you revive Ragshake, I can NK him, which also has the added effect of removing him from the game for two cycles.  If the game isn't over by that time, they re-enter the game still dead. 

hector13

  • Bay Watcher
  • It’s shite being Scottish
    • View Profile
Re: Flabort's High Powered Bring Your Own Role 2: Day 4: Expanded Roster
« Reply #714 on: February 29, 2016, 10:17:43 am »

This would require someone else. I can stop him doing anything after he's revived, but it would likely necessitate waiting a bit. Game probably won't end in 2/3 cycles unless folk get rather murder-y.
Logged
Look, we need to raise a psychopath who will murder God, we have no time to be spending on cooking.

the way your fingertips plant meaningless soliloquies makes me think you are the true evil among us.

TolyK

  • Bay Watcher
  • Nowan Ilfideme
    • View Profile
Re: Flabort's High Powered Bring Your Own Role 2: Day 4: Expanded Roster
« Reply #715 on: February 29, 2016, 10:29:46 am »

PPE: WARNING HUGE POST.

I don't see that much good or bad coming from killing TDS. I'd ask him, tbh.

That depends. What's the average cult wincon? If they lose when the leader dies, then it'd be less worth it. We'd still know that he's Cult Leader then, and we could roleblock him forever.
Hold on. If you're a normal townie, why would you roleblock the leader forever?



Let's get some things straight. If you don't see why something follows from something, just ask.
Format is: ability [source]

UNFINISHED (though almost done) (see: below the quote wall)

What we know about folks (publicly):
OragamiScienceGuy - nothing much? REMOVED from game N3
FallacyofUrist - DEAD (NK'd N2), RIPstone
Tawarochir - trigger warnings, nothing much? tried to eat NQT's soul D4 [sauce] which failed, tried to kill TolyK if he killed(?)
Deus Asmoth - had Orden suicide, RIPstone, revived N1, can't be cult leader, threatened TMS D4 w/ trigger [trigger warning]
TheDarkStar - has Orden post-changer [TolyK, DA, TDS], flips are correct [TDS], triple-self-target [claim]
Hector13 - DEAD (NK'd N1), RIPstone, caused D2 skip, given infraction D3
TMS - nothing much, just talk?
Tiruin - Solid Snake stuff D1, blocked N2 while metatracking [sauce], attempted daykill D3 on TolyK [Flabort & timing], superblocked Tawar N4 [sauce]; full action claim [here], stops time until votes/actions
4maskwolf - alignmentcall ability [sauce], Gave FoU Infraction role N1 [sauce], can get around inspection-magnet Tumbleweed [sauce]
Notquitethere - DEAD (NK'd N1), RIPstone, chat w/ TolyK [TolyK]
Shakerag - has annoucement role [Shakerag & Flabort], watch&track(N1 Tiruin/Hector to Tumbleweed + ?, N2 4mask to Tumbleweed +?), N3 turned extra roles into NPC's
Teneb - nothing much?
TolyK - got infraction D1 & D3 [sauce], got-shot-but-not-really D3 [sauce],

Non-Player Characters:
Ragshake, Shakerag's Evil Twin  - DEAD (Lynched D3) - OUTSIDER
The Tumbling Tumbleweed - 3rdParty TownAlly [4mask]
THE GRIFFIN - don't care, tho "annoyed"?
THE SARGENT - meh, from "sharkwerm"?


Interesting posts here:


There! I figured out what was annoying me!
I had another one, but FallacyofUrist revealed early D1 that he had a copy of the role (indirectly), so I gave it to him N1.
So, you started with one, gave it to FoU, and eventually...

Hold up. Hold right on up.

I'll elaborate on this in a bit (as time allows - I still have lots to do as well as sleep before tomorrow -.-), but it seems to me like something doesn't add up. 4maskwolf for now.
Here. 4mask said he gave the Annoying role to FoU N1, which FoU "revealed (indirectly)" that he had. That means that there were at least 2 copies the first day. And I currently have 3, including recieving one early on with an infraction.
That means several people are in on it, and definitely 1, most likely 2+ people haven't claimed it or claimed correctly.



Currently I'm fine with lynching TMS since he's become very active and (more importantly) very defensive this last day (don't even remember any valuable content from BEFORE he jumped on DA, which is actually a point in his favor) AND (Important!) I don't believe the other candidates (DA? that's it?) are worth lynching, at least not yet. Lynching DA, for example, would only give us information on whether he's a cult member now or not, while TMS would give a lot of abilities + possibly alignment.

After that, we'll see what comes of TMS. At worst I'll be speaking through TDS or DA. :P
Logged
My Mafia Stats
just do whatevery tolyK and blame it as a bastard mod
Shakerag: Who are you personally suspicious of?
At this point?  TolyK.

Tiruin

  • Bay Watcher
  • Life is too short for worries
    • View Profile
Re: Flabort's High Powered Bring Your Own Role 2: Day 4: Expanded Roster
« Reply #716 on: February 29, 2016, 11:37:18 am »

I punch TolyK for deploying a hueg post too :I




Alrighty, big post here [in which I'm saving a copy for any hilarity-editing power to not mess up with -.-]
I've been partly biased at the lacking dayplay but that may be due to moodiness and otherwise. Maybe because of the feeling that roles will give more credence than scumhunting; I'm unsure. The variance is too big to include any significant sign of skewedness. [/feelingstatistics]

>>> The lurkertracker does work, but only under a specified setup.

A few notes to drop in my observations:
> A strange thing happened D1 that nobody has come forth with details about.
> TolyK despite his mannerisms about all win and deeply open or 'transparent' motives--I have come to suspect may know a heck load more in regards to many things  {Notes 3, 4, 5; TDS spoiler} -- Note 3 especially because TolyK was the one inquiring.


TolyK: When did you quicktopic DA and TDS? Why did you do so? [and still haven't posted about it?]
> You said you can kill. Details on twice? [opening the box twice. Pandora funtimes \o/]
> Has presumably submitted more than 2 roles {along with Shakerag, Hector, Teneb, Tawa, FallacyofUrist} [Is this correct? I submitted only 2] (Also this link has the other note of a kill there for TolyK, so multi-kill abilities present)
> Has a random role/inspection shot
> Has vouched for everyone wins. Stretching into D3. {Notably having quicktopics with NQT, TDS, and DA at this point}, plus "extra conditions" in D4.
...It's also subtly a cheap way to earn infractions if people did go by it :P
> The heck is this? What's this quip to TMS here? [ALSO expound on this -.- Please recheck the OP wincons]
> IMO, a very good example of banter.
> Has much faith and cheer in people despite bad events happening IRL to him. :'( Such a trooper.


***If any of these people receive 2 infractions, these claims in the links are forfeit.
Also I've a ton of notes in the TDS spoiler that it's actually a DA/TDS/TolyK spoiler given the ton of links and associations derived from it that I'm just -.- all around.
TDS
***Has a paradox role in play.
Spoiler: TDS Notes* (click to show/hide)



People who cannot be the cult leader:
Tawarochir
All the flipped people [that includes the wild-card Hector, whose alignment is Outsider because of a role which obscures his real alignment] {DA, FoU, Hector, ragshaek :V, NQT}



TolyK has a lot of notes stuck onto him -.-
There's a specific query about triggers--possibly the question that led to TolyK picking TDS as his 'quicktopic' person (and also note #7 shared with TDS about 'don't kill me', along with the exposed banter I'm recording from TolyK's night quicktopic choice); I'm wondering why you still picked those two, TolyK, especially why only TDS in that circumstance out of anyone at all. Anyone. At. All. And may particularly distrust that TDS' "roleflip is true" role being particularly as it is advertised given the lack of communication traded after N1 between those two, and you, and the general public.

So grouping y'all into a corner--TDS/DA/TolyK as a team given the quicktopic they've got. They're all leaning towards a more solid standpoint of Town or otherwise individually from all that.

That leaves:
Tawarochir
Hector13
The Moonlit Shadow
4maskwolf
Shakerag
Teneb

And Tiruin [Hi!] and a poof'd OrigamiScienceGuy--I'm personally discounting OSG as the cult leader since it seems his action was a night action, and unless that actions means 'convert and poof away for a phase', I'm doubtful of all that ability-funtime.


If anyone has suspicion that I'm the cult leader; bring it forth because I've apparently tied Tawarochir in an action claim in public. Add that to any claim put forth :v If Mafia, bring it too.


Teneb//Deathsword
> Has a lie detector power which may be said to be an auto based on his action claims [still waiting on why I was crowbar'd and responses to your actions in the other phases]; note the connection which provides evidence into that role.
=== Please come forth with details about the lie/truth thingy thus far: Does it activate on the first post per person per day, or is it for every darn post per day?
> Claimed early to have a paradox role too. [Can't win unless dead. Can't ded unless win?]


TMS
> Seems to have gotten a confusing setup or a 'short stick' as an analogy.
> Is the cause of the boxes of Orden; I've a speculation running that if a person who controls a role that makes stuff exist, dies, and the role has no indication that it can work when dead [as is the USUAL IMPLICATION IN ALL ROLES], all boxes of Orden go poof :V So I do deeply inherently believe that it is best to deploy a kill-everyone pattern to simplify everything unless a better plan can be had, thanks to PPE TolyK maneuver.
> I've typed out most of this offline, and my last comprehensive read was until: here (despite me posting here)

So a few questions:
> Why have your posts been singlehandedly oriented towards someone who is possibly a cultist? You're new, and let's hypothetically put you as town: why is a cultist of foremost priority to you when there is lacking confirmation towards it other than erratic behavior? That's my only question on that point because I also have noticed that the lack of day talk and the commitment you put into your words speaks of a newbie-nature rather than a certain Mafia-esque nature trying to scope out cult (that, and I do believe if you were Mafia hunting cult--your allies would've advised you otherwise; if you're cult hunting cult...this isn't something normally done to preserve dignity of that alignment)
> On This post, did you take into account that DA, TOlyK, and TDS may actually be a impromptu team on their own given their (not-really-subtly-in-Tiruin's-eye) bias in how they're acting lately?
...Cut that short into: Did you pay attention to TolyK's post where he mentioned his quicktopic links?
> You voted TDS
Spoiler: on this basis (click to show/hide)
then put in the idea of subtly telling the reason in...invisitext [hint: It's color: Transparent--if anyone catches you doing this, it's a NO-NO in any Mafia game because it's just frustrating and ANNOYING for any alignment to do so -.- even if it is 'I said this earlier no you can't catch me on it :P]
> You say you're going after the Cult Leader or the mafia, alright, that's reasonable. And the line of reasoning in poking TDS is reasonable in that sense. Am I correct in asking that your vote onto him is because you think TDS is the cult leader?
> Could I ask you why you began thinking of 'cultist' and then poked DA, as a first priority of the day for your posting pattern?
>


I'm lacking notes on 4mask, Shakerag, Tawa, [I suspect Hector knows his true alignment because his role was given along with his wincon, probably.]
Because of lacking activity from them.
Hector has shown his RVS vote into his wincon that forwards getting Shaekrag out.
Shakerag submitted and backs up Tawarochir's role restriction of trigger warnings.
Shakerag: In this post, what do you think will happen in 2 cycles? The wording has a certain tone to it.


Tawarochir
Has. Shown. Trigger. Warnings. BUT has not shown any of those past...well, I think the love of Fire Emblem stopped him from doing that.




Everyone voting TMS: I still cannot see the logic which isolates him as a prime target to lynch here. (Excluding the leaning bias seeping out from TDS/DA/TolyK :V), I see a lot of space in between TMS' posts that make him suspicious--I agree that it's a point against him, but it's also a point for him because it's quite a leap to make first of all. Basing your foundation on that leap (see: He has a reads list which makes his linear processing from that reasonable, even if it may not seem logical [his vote pattern has been TDS, DA and TolyK though o_O]; This is the only time wherein he voted despite discussing his ideas beforehand regarding DA. This was at a time wherein NOBODY KNEW I HAD THE TIME STOPPED. Take that big mention there.

Yep, TolyK, TDS, DA team confirmed :V
Logged

Tiruin

  • Bay Watcher
  • Life is too short for worries
    • View Profile
Re: Flabort's High Powered Bring Your Own Role 2: Day 4: Expanded Roster
« Reply #717 on: February 29, 2016, 11:44:45 am »

Currently I'm fine with lynching TMS since he's become very active and (more importantly) very defensive this last day (don't even remember any valuable content from BEFORE he jumped on DA, which is actually a point in his favor) AND (Important!) I don't believe the other candidates (DA? that's it?) are worth lynching, at least not yet. Lynching DA, for example, would only give us information on whether he's a cult member now or not, while TMS would give a lot of abilities + possibly alignment.

After that, we'll see what comes of TMS. At worst I'll be speaking through TDS or DA. :P
That's cuz you've thrown in your lot with TDS or DA and are grilling TMS, without making sure what he's saying is actually what he's saying instead of implications or impressions or assumptions, as per vote patterns and banter has given me insight into :V I'm also aware that you possibly know the OTHER PEOPLE WITH LOW DAY-SPEAKING-STUFF have said things and somehow are not within your mention of comparison to TMS [while I agree his mentions of cultist//DA is strange, it's reasonable when you see DA's erratic behavior from a non-team-oriented eye. This correlates my idea that a newbie would be invested in. And somehow he's being hit for it {esp when you include DA's playstyle being like a brick wall. Tough and grumpy.}]

But I'm too tired to look back on what TMS said other than noticing what in the world he's been going on about cultists, lacking notes on what he's saying about Mafia (specifically), and whatever.
Dear goodness 4mask, Shakerag, Teneb, other sentient beings, please post more :'(

Oh, also can people please divide their votes if the majority vote is on TMS? Still sitting on refreshing the Nuke button here that'll hit the one with most votes. I can't obviously vote else that'd be like an insta-vote-hammer-day-end button. :V
Logged

hector13

  • Bay Watcher
  • It’s shite being Scottish
    • View Profile
Re: Flabort's High Powered Bring Your Own Role 2: Day 4: Expanded Roster
« Reply #718 on: February 29, 2016, 12:00:40 pm »

@Tiruin: Shakerag claimed he did the Jester announcement thing D1 for... some reason or another that didn't pan out as he had hoped. There was another announcement that he was confirmed town during day 2/3, too.

Not read much of the rest of your post (goddamn) as busy-ass day that has started poorly. It ends in a driving lesson, so hopefully the trend for the day is upward, else I'll be in the jail by the end :o
Logged
Look, we need to raise a psychopath who will murder God, we have no time to be spending on cooking.

the way your fingertips plant meaningless soliloquies makes me think you are the true evil among us.

Shakerag

  • Bay Watcher
  • Just here for the schadenfreude.
    • View Profile
Re: Flabort's High Powered Bring Your Own Role 2: Day 4: Expanded Roster
« Reply #719 on: February 29, 2016, 01:02:39 pm »

Tir-bear:
Shakerag: In this post, what do you think will happen in 2 cycles? The wording has a certain tone to it.
Like, if I use that ability?  Well, whoever I kill is returned to the game, still dead.  Otherwise they are removed from the game.  And dead.  I'm not sure if the "removing from the game for 2 cycles" thing happens if the kill doesn't happen.
Pages: 1 ... 46 47 [48] 49 50 ... 73