Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[TolyK]

Of course I mean GRIFFIN. Ugh.

[Shakerag]

Of course I mean GRIFFIN. Ugh.

I suppose the technical answer to that question would be: flabort.

[TheDarkStar]

Is there anyone who can destroy roles?

[hector13]

Is there anyone who can destroy roles?

I'd like that. I'd totally like that.

[Teneb]

Is there anyone who can destroy roles?

I'd like that. I'd totally like that.

I think DA can. I can get roles, though not today.

Tiruin: You said the day only ends when you make an action, but wasn't your returning my role and getting yours back one?

[Shakerag]

I can destroy roles if I have them.  Why?

[Teneb]

I can destroy roles if I have them.  Why?

No one can win while a certain role, currently held by the deceased NQT, exists.

Mandatory Shakeragian Shenanigans
(Auto) You cannot win while...: If any team or player would win, the first person who died who's living would prevent that victory is resurected. They retain their access to the dead-chat.
(Auto) ...this role is in play: This role functions even if it's owner is dead.

Unrelated to the above but...
Mod: What happens to a player if the game ends while they are temporarily out of the game, like OSG is now?

[Deus Asmoth]

Is there anyone who can destroy roles?

I'd like that. I'd totally like that.

I think DA can. I can get roles, though not today.

Tiruin: You said the day only ends when you make an action, but wasn't your returning my role and getting yours back one?

I can't. Tawa said that he could, but only for people that are dead. Plus he can end up with the role he wants to destroy, which is troublesome.

[flabort]

Mod: What happens to a player if the game ends while they are temporarily out of the game, like OSG is now?

They do not win or lose. If they have to file it under win or loss or tie, tie is probably the best way to file it.

[Tiruin]

PPE and PFP because my connection keeps being unstable

Tiruin: You said the day only ends when you make an action, but wasn't your returning my role and getting yours back one?

. . .
You claim you're the one who sent that action right?
Or maybe I'm unclear? (Guess I am o_O)
What I mean is if I make an action-that-is-not-free. That role loaned to me which I gave back is detailed as a free-action.

We lack people's reasoning for why they targeted who they targeted.

PFP before I forget:
Teneb, why'd you target me with a crowbar? o_O

I can destroy roles if I have them.  Why?

No one can win while a certain role, currently held by the deceased NQT, exists.

Mandatory Shakeragian Shenanigans
(Auto) You cannot win while...: If any team or player would win, the first person who died who's living would prevent that victory is resurected. They retain their access to the dead-chat.
(Auto) ...this role is in play: This role functions even if it's owner is dead.

Unrelated to the above but...
Mod: What happens to a player if the game ends while they are temporarily out of the game, like OSG is now?

*cough*
"Nobody can also win while TDS is alive :V" as he mentioned earlier.

Speaking of TDS:

About TDS: He's always claimed to have a kill immunity?

Where?

Also

I have reason to strongly suspect that all investigations will fail.

Details, TDS
Unless I missed something, looking after the actions it seems there's a lot of static interference in the way.

Seriously, this whole game certain people are posting without details. Vague references to their possible abilities or roles aside, it's just ugh. <_> [Or more how I feel because I was moody days earlier...Same applies to me though, but here's a note list offline!]

People who are voting TMS: What's your case on him?
People who are voting DA: What's the relevance of your case on voting him as the lynch target?
I'd expound on this in a big post later on but then argh net/busyness

Considering who keeps talking about them (reminded of Teneb and 4mask but I do feel there're more in the periphery of my memory), I'm pretty blunt. But I'm glad I'm making that read list :V

Erm... I think you've got the wrong people.  I don't talk about the NPC's outside of stating the known alignments of the original NPC's in the context of the alignment list I received.

Which is what I mean by my memory
But really--checking up the content of people's posts, it's pretty much over the counted # of scum present so...people generally just need to post more content :v (Also I do see a significant # of people vote-poking TMS because...? And compare him to the rest is because...? We've gleaned much info from those who have actively posted today, and I just noticed people lacked reasons for their actions!

I also made a mistake in my massclaim; I did that Solid Snake, thinking it adds only one vote (misread). So yeah

I think I detailed why I targeted TDS before, but for clarity--I did it because I didn't want any lynch shenanigans (and then internet ded afterwards :V)

On FoU it was on an inclination towards his motive here. Rather on the proceeding on it--I wanted to be shore he wasn't in anyway tied to TDS (or to isolate the variables which make me conclude he's town or otherwise). But then I hit the tumbleweed :V

Aiming on TolyK was because of me wanting to really know what he's up to--that was before I re-re-re-re-read my action and found out it goes the opposite way. Case in point, I can confirm I got crowbar'd.
BUT NOT IN THE WAY TENEB SAID IT :I
You didn't bop me on the head, you jammed me BACK IN THE CLOSET D:<
Seriously, you stuck me in the closet :V

Nuking TolyK was on the matter of revivers. Moving towards today; the strangeness that happened + Tawa's soul eat thingy makes me feel that there's a role that blocks daykills (seriously? >_>).

Tawarochir was more on based-on-notes, and a lack of activity. His activity is low, and there's a lacking read on most people--but he's someone not heard of as of late (though I envy him playinf Fire Emblem :V).


I'll get in that post later on <_> net isn't being nice. [Or it is but my busyness isn't. Gah.]

[Deus Asmoth]

I'm voting for TMS because his justification for his case is completely at odds with how he's been pursuing his case. He claims that I was wasting time and drawing attention to myself, and his solution to this is to spend the entire day almost exclusively talking to or about me. Then he acts as though it's a scumtell that I have to spend time actually answering the points he's putting to me. He also initially claimed to be town reading me (while still speculating on how to kill me) and only flipped to scum reading and voting me after I asked him about it. Not to mention that even if he were right about me, he's apparently perfectly content with wasting several days trying to kill me while the cult leader roams wild and free. And he hasn't presented any possible leads on who the cult leader would be in the event of him being right, or what to do about it.

[TolyK]

TBH I think any speculation on cultists or cult leaders is still speculation - we knew nothing about them before 4mask said anything. Plus, nothing at all is confirmed. It seems legit, though gambitzzzzzzz can still pay off, especially if they started this well.

[Shakerag]

Can we get a votecount up in here?

[4maskwolf]

Spoiler: TolyK in a nutshell (click to show/hide)

[TolyK]

I actually trust TDS the most, here. Shakerag is also kinda close, however for no apparent reason... >.>