Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Nunzillor]

This is the breakdown:

INFP: 8 (~31%)
INTP: 9 (~35%)
ENTP: 2 (~8%)
INTJ: 3 (~12%)
ISFP: 1 (~4%)
ISTJ: 1 (~4%)
DTPT: 1 (~4%)
ENTJ: 1 (~4%)

According to the test, INTP and INFP only make up 3 and 4 percent of the population, respectively.  So bay12 appears to have an usually high concentration of these people, I think.  Personally, I think INTP and INTJ seem to best capture the spirit of the average DF-playing person.

Edit: Also, I love that Tolkien quote on there so I have to sig it.

[penguinofhonor]

.

[Bumber]

ISTP-A

Spoiler (click to show/hide)

97% Introverted
53% Observant
71% Thinking
71% Prospecting
52% Assertive

[Starver]

This test has 32 results, not 16.

What I thought...

But that the fifth measure is new to me, and makes it now 32 personality types(on the binary scale), unless they have made that a dimensionless measure entirely based upon the results of the classical four.)

...but INFP clearly appears in both -A and -T variations, so that isn't the explanation.  (That they decided to add -A/T to the original 16 types after marketing it as "16 types" is the obvious explanation.

I tried wrastling the BBCode required to do my own table(s) of results, so far, from Bay12ers (counts in bold, other information given when observed), but I don't think I got the counts right, the other information isn't prolific enough and it really needs table-borders around and across the sub-tables, which I can't seem to activate (colspan/rowspan would be handy, too...) but here it is anyway:

Assertive(-A)	Turbulent(-T)	Unspecified(-?)
\   \ Extrovt(E) +Think(T) Extrovt(E) +Feel(F) Introvt(I) +Feel(F) Introvt(I) +Think(T) Intuit(N) +Judge(J) ENTJ-A=1 "Commander" Analyst, People Mastery ENFJ-A "Protagonist" Diplomat, People Mastery INFJ-A "Advocate" Diplomat, Confident Individualism INTJ-A=1 "Architect" Analyst, Confident Individualism Intuit(N) +Prosp(P) ENTP-A=1 "Debater" Analyst, People Mastery ENFP-A "Campaigner" Diplomat, People Mastery INFP-A=2 "Mediator" Diplomat, Confident Individualism INTP-A=3 "Logician" Analyst, Confident Individualism Obsrv(S) +Prosp(P) ESTP-A "Entrepreneur" Explorer, People Mastery ESFP-A "Entertainer" Explorer, People Mastery ISFP-A=1 "Adventurer" Explorer, Confident Individualism ISTP-A=1 "Virtuoso" Explorer, Confident Individualism Obsrv(S) +Judge(J) ESTJ-A "Executive" Sentinel, People Mastery ESFJ-A "Consul" Sentinel, People Mastery ISFJ-A "Defender" Sentinel, Confident Individualism ISTJ-A=1 "Logistician" Sentinel, Confident Individualism	\   \ Extrovt(E) +Think(T) Extrovt(E) +Feel(F) Introvt(I) +Feel(F) Introvt(I) +Think(T) Intuit(N) +Judge(J) ENTJ-T "Commander" Analyst, Social Engagement ENFJ-T "Protagonist" Diplomat, Social Engagement INFJ-T "Advocate" Diplomat, Constant Improvement INTJ-T "Architect" Analyst, Constant Improvement Intuit(N) +Prosp(P) ENTP-T "Debater" Analyst, Social Engagement ENFP-T "Campaigner" Diplomat, Social Engagement INFP-T=6 "Mediator" Diplomat, Constant Improvement INTP-T=3 "Logician" Analyst, Constant Improvement Obsrv(S) +Prosp(P) ESTP-T "Entrepreneur" Explorer, Social Engagement ESFP-T "Entertainer" Explorer, Social Engagement ISFP-T=1 "Adventurer" Explorer, Constant Improvement ISTP-T "Virtuoso" Explorer, Constant Improvement Obsrv(S) +Judge(J) ESTJ-T "Executive" Sentinel, Social Engagement ESFJ-T "Consul" Sentinel, Social Engagement ISFJ-T "Defender" Sentinel, Constant Improvement ISTJ-T "Logistician" Sentinel, Constant Improvement	\   \ Extrovt(E) +Think(T) Extrovt(E) +Feel(F) Introvt(I) +Feel(F) Introvt(I) +Think(T) Intuit(N) +Judge(J) ENTJ-? "Commander" Analyst, PM/SE ENFJ-? "Protagonist" Diplomat, PM/SE INFJ-?=1 "Advocate" Diplomat, CI/CI INTJ-?=2.5 "Architect" Analyst, CI/CI Intuit(N) +Prosp(P) ENTP-? "Debater" Analyst, PM/SE ENFP-? "Campaigner" Diplomat, PM/SE INFP-? "Mediator" Diplomat, CI/CI INTP-?=3.5 "Logician" Analyst, CI/CI Obsrv(S) +Prosp(P) ESTP-? "Entrepreneur" Explorer, PM/SE ESFP-? "Entertainer" Explorer, PM/SE ISFP-? "Adventurer" Explorer, CI/CI ISTP-? "Virtuoso" Explorer, CI/CI Obsrv(S) +Judge(J) ESTJ-? "Executive" Sentinel, PM/SE ESFJ-? "Consul" Sentinel, PM/SE ISFJ-? "Defender" Sentinel, CI/CI ISTJ-? "Logistician" Sentinel, CI/CI

(The source BBCode is horrible, given the need to insert minimum unintended whitespace and therefore line-feeds, but it's easy enough to hunt down and insert/change the information based upon the ####-# placeholders.)

edited in a minor table tweak...
further tweaks to populate, and transferred Nunzillor, as per below, but counts probably still wrong...

[Nunzillor]

Excellent chart!  To clarify, it said I was an INFP-T (currently marked on the chart as unspecified), if you have a desire to update it.

[Starver]

Excellent chart!  To clarify, it said I was an INFP-T (currently marked on the chart as unspecified), if you have a desire to update it.

Well, if you have a look back, I now transferred your tally across, whilst filling in the sub-details¹ but I bet the values are still wrong.  I'm not going to try to keep it updated, as there'll not be a statistically significant number of tallies, anyway...  I just started to prettify what was supposed to be a quick proof of concept, and it's done its job...  Feel free to copypaste it, anybody who wants to.  But not sure why you would.

¹ "Sentinel" and "Explorer" could be moved to a single mention at the left of the last/penultimate rows, respectively and PM, SE, and both CIs could be applied to the appropriate columns, rather than repeating, but Analyst/Diplomat are 'square' (Analyst wraps-around) upon this particular truth-table format.

[inteuniso]

ENFP-T. Looks like I'm like a lot of you. Except I'm not.

[Shadowlord]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myers%E2%80%93Briggs_Type_Indicator#Criticism

If you don't want to read all that and would rather have an anecdote, I took one of these (from another site) before, and the funny thing was, it couldn't decide whether to give me intj or intp. Retook it several times and it kept changing its answer.

[quinnr]

They explain the whole -A and -T thing on this page, since it's not traditionally a part of the Meyers-Briggs thing.

[TheBiggerFish]

I note that they also used different definitions?
Huh.

[Comrade P.]

Hey peeps, look at relevant to this thread thing I found

Spoiler (click to show/hide)

[Nunzillor]

That's cool.  It's incredibly depressing, however.  If that's accurate, the vast majority of us (INFP + INTP) are more likely to be unemployed and will make lower salaries, especially INFP.

[Comrade P.]

>ISFP
>Lower salaries than the average
>Highest unemployment
>Current major not matching suggested

Well fuck.

[Nunzillor]

 

[Caz]

Cool, apparently my love matches are INTP/INFP.


...How you doin', Bay12