Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 [11]

Author Topic: Arms Race - 1784: Dunwich Meritocratic Confederacy Design Phase  (Read 10753 times)

Ukrainian Ranger

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Arms Race - 1784: Dunwich Meritocratic Confederacy Design Phase
« Reply #150 on: February 18, 2016, 01:39:03 pm »

Why should we care much about preventing further landing when they landed already?

Besides control over seas gives real benefits, while control over land gives nothing
Logged
War must be, while we defend our lives against a destroyer who would devour all; but I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend.

Sheb

  • Bay Watcher
  • You Are An Avatar
    • View Profile
Re: Arms Race - 1784: Dunwich Meritocratic Confederacy Design Phase
« Reply #151 on: February 18, 2016, 01:48:07 pm »

Because cutting reinforcement is a prerequisite to kick them back into the sea?
Logged

Quote from: Paul-Henry Spaak
Europe consists only of small countries, some of which know it and some of which don’t yet.

Funk

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Arms Race - 1784: Dunwich Meritocratic Confederacy Design Phase
« Reply #152 on: February 18, 2016, 05:48:47 pm »

A revision could get us a big Van Karsten gun that could fill the role though, and we really need our own blue water navy.

Do we? Gunboats could be a cheaper way to deny them landing, which is the real priority.
We do need a cheap gunship, what about useing a single long barreled chaser cannon on fast ships?.
Logged
Agree, plus that's about the LAST thing *I* want to see from this kind of game - author spending valuable development time on useless graphics.

Unofficial slogan of Bay 12 Games.  

Death to the false emperor a warhammer40k SG

Ukrainian Ranger

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Arms Race - 1784: Dunwich Meritocratic Confederacy Design Phase
« Reply #153 on: February 18, 2016, 09:23:04 pm »

My design is a cheap gunship
Logged
War must be, while we defend our lives against a destroyer who would devour all; but I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend.

RAM

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Arms Race - 1784: Dunwich Meritocratic Confederacy Design Phase
« Reply #154 on: February 18, 2016, 09:55:36 pm »

You never explained how it could turn its guns. I mean, sure, they are presumably on wheels or something, but you have cramped quarters and such... mine has that rudimentary turret thing...

Also, I am a big supporter of a better artillery piece, ideally designed for naval warfare, so a heavy focus on range, penetration, and accuracy, as opposed to the traditional needs of artillery that are more inclined for hitting a planet-sized target and splashing lots of bits around. As it would be great for a proper warship in the future. But I am leaning towards needing a coastal skirmisher now to keep them from safely supplying their invasion.
Logged
Vote (1) for the Urist scale!
I shall be eternally happy. I shall be able to construct elf hunting giant mecha. Which can pour magma.
Urist has been forced to use a friend as fertilizer lately.
Read the First Post!

Sheb

  • Bay Watcher
  • You Are An Avatar
    • View Profile
Re: Arms Race - 1784: Dunwich Meritocratic Confederacy Design Phase
« Reply #155 on: February 19, 2016, 01:48:25 am »

My design is a cheap gunship

Totally, I was just reacting to Baffle and his argument we need a blue-water navy.
Logged

Quote from: Paul-Henry Spaak
Europe consists only of small countries, some of which know it and some of which don’t yet.

Baffler

  • Bay Watcher
  • Caveat Lector.
    • View Profile
Re: Arms Race - 1784: Dunwich Meritocratic Confederacy Design Phase
« Reply #156 on: February 19, 2016, 03:19:20 pm »

My design is a cheap gunship

Totally, I was just reacting to Baffle and his argument we need a blue-water navy.

Oh, I like the gunship. I was just confused about terminology and thinking "blue water" meant "capable of going on the ocean" as opposed to a riverboat or something.
Logged
Quote from: Helgoland
Even if you found a suitable opening, I doubt it would prove all too satisfying. And it might leave some nasty wounds, depending on the moral high ground's geology.
Location subject to periodic change.
Baffler likes silver, walnut trees, the color green, tanzanite, and dogs for their loyalty. When possible he prefers to consume beef, iced tea, and cornbread. He absolutely detests ticks.

Sheb

  • Bay Watcher
  • You Are An Avatar
    • View Profile
Re: Arms Race - 1784: Dunwich Meritocratic Confederacy Design Phase
« Reply #157 on: February 19, 2016, 04:40:49 pm »

Usually one discriminate between brown-water (Rivers, lake, coastline), green-water (littoral and close sea) and blue-water (open oceans). In this case, gunboats would be brown- or green-water navy. Blue-water navy would be real ships.
Logged

Quote from: Paul-Henry Spaak
Europe consists only of small countries, some of which know it and some of which don’t yet.
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 [11]