Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 10 11 [12] 13 14 ... 16

Author Topic: Sappho's “Happy” New Year Blowout Giveaway - Videos On Their Way!  (Read 26779 times)

GentlemanRaptor

  • Bay Watcher
  • Got a present for ya!
    • View Profile
Re: Sappho's “Happy” New Year Blowout Giveaway - PRIZES AWARDED!
« Reply #165 on: January 23, 2016, 07:57:25 am »

I'm not feeling particularly vengeful, and I did just play this through once and enjoy it, so I nominate Consortium.
Logged
Amusingly, he's a Marksdwarf, which gives me the mental image of him conducting medical malpractice an appendectomy from fifty paces with a crossbow.
On bay12, a poll option of basically 'nuke the world' named 'Apocalypse Hitler' is like asking an alcoholic if they want some whiskey.

JimboM12

  • Bay Watcher
  • Dank.
    • View Profile
Re: Sappho's “Happy” New Year Blowout Giveaway - PRIZES AWARDED!
« Reply #166 on: January 23, 2016, 09:28:27 am »

I'm not feeling particularly vengeful, and I did just play this through once and enjoy it, so I nominate Consortium.

I'm gonna double up on Consortium, I heard it was a little mind-bendy but good and I bought it and never played it, so getting someone to actually try it for me for longer then 30 minutes might make me wanna play it.
Logged
Pemmican is pretty incredibly durable. Corn and rice also lust forever without refrigeration.
Ah yes, the insatiable lust of corn and rice, clearly two of the most erotic foods.

Parsely

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
    • My games!
Re: Sappho's “Happy” New Year Blowout Giveaway - PRIZES AWARDED!
« Reply #167 on: January 23, 2016, 09:39:03 am »

I'm not feeling particularly vengeful, and I did just play this through once and enjoy it, so I nominate Consortium.

I'm gonna double up on Consortium, I heard it was a little mind-bendy but good and I bought it and never played it, so getting someone to actually try it for me for longer then 30 minutes might make me wanna play it.
You're supposed to pick a BAD game to torture her. I watched Xanmyral play it for an hour and it actually seemed fun!

Sappho if there's a game needs reviewing I'll do it. No rewards necessary.
Logged

MetalSlimeHunt

  • Bay Watcher
  • Gerrymander Commander
    • View Profile
Re: Sappho's “Happy” New Year Blowout Giveaway - PRIZES AWARDED!
« Reply #168 on: January 23, 2016, 10:45:58 am »

I nominate The Elder Scrolls III: Moro- no, but you should play more of that. Only six hours on record? For shame.

I actually nominate FarSky, on the basis that it looks like Stranded 2 on the ocean floor.
Logged
Quote from: Thomas Paine
To argue with a man who has renounced the use and authority of reason, and whose philosophy consists in holding humanity in contempt, is like administering medicine to the dead, or endeavoring to convert an atheist by scripture.
Quote
No Gods, No Masters.

Darkmere

  • Bay Watcher
  • Exploding me won't bring back your honey.
    • View Profile
Re: Sappho's “Happy” New Year Blowout Giveaway - PRIZES AWARDED!
« Reply #169 on: January 23, 2016, 12:24:29 pm »

My what a big list you have...

I'm not gonna vote for Consortium since I just got a free copy on steam's giveaway... so you leave me no choice but to nominate Sir, You Are Being Hunted because it's got gentleman robots with monocles if I'm remembering right.

Thanks for the drama-bomb prize, by the way. I had fun writing the reviews, glad someone enjoyed reading them.
Logged
And then, they will be weaponized. Like everything in this game, from kittens to babies, everything is a potential device of murder.
So if baseless speculation is all we have, we might as well treat it like fact.

Sappho

  • Bay Watcher
  • AKA Aira; Legendary Female Gamer
    • View Profile
    • Aira Plays Games
Re: Sappho's “Happy” New Year Blowout Giveaway - PRIZES AWARDED!
« Reply #170 on: January 23, 2016, 01:06:59 pm »

I'm not feeling particularly vengeful, and I did just play this through once and enjoy it, so I nominate Consortium.

I'm gonna double up on Consortium, I heard it was a little mind-bendy but good and I bought it and never played it, so getting someone to actually try it for me for longer then 30 minutes might make me wanna play it.

New rule: everyone must choose a different game. This is only the nominating part; you can vote for whichever game you want when voting time comes. ;) Oh, and I forgot to mention - winners get THREE votes, just like honorable mentions. And those with multiple votes, you can put them all towards the same game, or towards different games - up to you.

EDIT:

I nominate The Elder Scrolls III: Moro- no, but you should play more of that. Only six hours on record? For shame.

What you have to keep in mind is that six hours is about two weeks of gaming time for me. I'm literally too busy to play games. Lately I play almost exclusively casual games, because they're the only thing I can get into - I don't have a big chunk of time to sit down, learn how to play, and get immersed in a larger game. :( There's a week off of school in February sometime though, so I'll have a few days free (though I'll still have to work my other job half the week). For now I'll probably have to rely on weekends to get these reviews done - I don't make any promises about *finishing* any of these games by the way. I'm just going to go as far as I can.
« Last Edit: January 23, 2016, 01:09:47 pm by Sappho »
Logged

choppy

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Sappho's “Happy” New Year Blowout Giveaway - PRIZES AWARDED!
« Reply #171 on: January 23, 2016, 02:30:48 pm »

I am torn between Shatteredplanet and OneWayHeroics. for Shatteredplanet I know you have played a bit of it and it would be interesting to see how the gameplay is. on the other hand it would be also interesting to see someone, who is better then me make at video making review/play the game.

as for the for my choice I am going with OneWayHeroics.

Ps. sorry about gauge I tried to make the video short, while showing how the gameplay was. (also thank again for the audio software tip)

Sappho

  • Bay Watcher
  • AKA Aira; Legendary Female Gamer
    • View Profile
    • Aira Plays Games
Re: Sappho's “Happy” New Year Blowout Giveaway - PRIZES AWARDED!
« Reply #172 on: January 23, 2016, 03:09:35 pm »

I am torn between Shatteredplanet and OneWayHeroics. for Shatteredplanet I know you have played a bit of it and it would be interesting to see how the gameplay is. on the other hand it would be also interesting to see someone, who is better then me make at video making review/play the game.

as for the for my choice I am going with OneWayHeroics.

Ps. sorry about gauge I tried to make the video short, while showing how the gameplay was. (also thank again for the audio software tip)

I've actually played a lot of Shattered Planet, on account of it's one of those games you can play for ten minutes then put down. In fact I'm pretty much at the "end game" stage right now and will probably give up playing it soon. I used to play One Way Heroics as well, but it's been a long while and I was never very good at it. ;)

And no apologies about the video! I don't think you could have done a more perfect and helpful review of Gauge. :D

Sheb

  • Bay Watcher
  • You Are An Avatar
    • View Profile
Re: Sappho's “Happy” New Year Blowout Giveaway - PRIZES AWARDED!
« Reply #173 on: January 23, 2016, 03:20:18 pm »

I'll nominate Goat Simulator.
Logged

Quote from: Paul-Henry Spaak
Europe consists only of small countries, some of which know it and some of which don’t yet.

Tiruin

  • Bay Watcher
  • Life is too short for worries
    • View Profile
Re: Sappho's “Happy” New Year Blowout Giveaway - PRIZES AWARDED!
« Reply #174 on: January 23, 2016, 03:29:29 pm »

Hoooo, I've been away since the 17th on forum time and-
January 23, 2016, 02:57:10 pm
.-.
Gonna make a post in a few hours for TheBlueFlamingo.
Sorry Sappho for the wait! :-X
eep!
You just had to breakdown Tiri. >_>

THE HALL OF SHAME
Tiruin - Did not one but TWO separate analyses of Boxeswithguns, but never wrote one about The Blue Flamingo. As the Boxeswithguns reviews were so in-depth, I'm inclined to be forgiving, especially as I'm aware her internet situation is not great - but I'd like to see at least a sentence or two about the second game.[...]
Honorable mention goes to Tiruin, who would have won but for the technicality of the missing second review.
Apologies Sappho and everyone else D: I had a something important that happened in the form of a sad that blew up and contributed to a breakdown which had me x_x until a day or so ago when I talked to someone really important and insightful (in which I really just needed someone to synch with my thinking). But yeah. That said, grats BFEL c: Transistor is an OSSUM game!
And sorry again Sappho D: I had the TBF review in text coming, but only finished it lately post-recovery! (in which I had to screenpic, paste, edit size, upload, for better contextual viewing)

On a humorous note, I didn't view my name there with any anxiety at all :P What popped into mind was a more humorous memory from...Spongebob I think, that precisely had the WALL OF SHAME in that episode.
...I think that was the one with the lucky stars/award stars, and Patrick.
...Yep, totally remembering the WALL OF SHAME now. :P Love you too Sappho.

Note! Each spoiler has a screenshot, but they're in spoilers for readability bonus!


The Blue Flamingo
And what a hangar it is, ladies and gents! Look at that simplicity, facing the open skies! Look at the hangar crew, each working in their specialized area! Look at that detail, and oh what detail it is—as from game background, mostly everything was made from real props and then animated into a game figure! This isn’t CGI, this is animated paper.
Don’t let the screenshot give any thoughts of poor visual contrast; being right there and playing it shows each word outlined easily here (of mention to that note: there’re two languages, English and French, but it’s in the stillness of the frame that gives this hue contrast difficulty).
My first thoughts here were: “Ah, a scoring system. I expect to die.” complemented with “No, Mr. Bond, I expect you to die!” “Ooo, a scoreboard that doesn’t insist to load scores?” (when I perfectly realized I was biased by BoxesW/Guns…), and “Hmm, I wonder why the Steam page is fraught with negative reviews?”

The nice thing here is that even if this game DOES start out fullscreen (and can be edited later on to be windowed in many of the common screen sizes), the alt-tab does not disrupt me from screen-picturing and saving screenshots. :3 Oh, and it patiently waits for you to alt-tab back to resume anything—even battle. That’s a nice touch there (or my inexperience—this seems to be the most poignant bit in memory with that alt-tab=pause/resume is what my memory says, but these bits are written after {breakdown stuffs} happened).
Spoiler (click to show/hide)
Biased from BoxesWithGuns, I checked the settings for any problems that may not be covered by my inevitable death contract visual or otherwise representations. I get a simple overview instead. Of note, those grey words like ‘Back, Apply, Controls’ “blink” when selected, probably as a way to denote ‘this is selected’. Everything checks out anyway, and I don’t expect anything bad from this kind of setting.
Spoiler (click to show/hide)
Controls are alright, pretty simple. Metaknowledge nudges me with a poke that this is a shooter game, so I’ll be a quickly flying atmospheric craft of honor and cinematic explosion. The same ‘blinking’ selector applies here too, so that blank space is actually a preset “W”—the screenshot didn’t get it though!
Spoiler (click to show/hide)
For fun, the Credits are pretty simple too! They also didn’t bother to obstruct the background aesthetics, which is a cool random note in my notebook. But for posterity purposes--there's a lot of space that could do with tooltips or pop-up boxes that happen when the mouse hovers over or selects an option. This will be covered in the ending.

All that covered, let’s get to gameplay. Upon clicking start. . .
Pretty awesome to think that these aren’t computer rendered on the basis—they’re paper props as well as other handy-crafted materials straight on a miniature scale! And they move seamlessly and smoothly as if they weren’t motion-tracked! The Blue Flamingo also doesn’t look like that aircraft on the right of the hangar back in that intro bit from top-down, and the shading and lighting is pretty well made to the pixel.
Spoiler (click to show/hide)
Pictured top: The Blue Flamingo
Propulsion: That tiny exhaust tail behind the large rudder.
Missing: My IDC (Inevitable Death Certificate).
I’m not a pilot and lack any experience than the online military manuals freely available, but that is a very short runway. Keeping this in mind, I laughed out in the name of good (and probably British) humor and began to face the foe. I do say British, because other than the humor I associate with the sudden happenings, there’s a nice drum roll as TBF is launched out, reminiscent of a ‘ready to battle’ theme.
Spoiler (click to show/hide)
It wasn’t actually a runway! It was a holding platform that drops you airborne like a jump-jet.
I am already amazed at the detail (I’m a detail girl who is grateful over them tiny bits that I easily get distracted by them x_x), so let’s get to the gameplay.
Spoiler (click to show/hide)
Straight out, I’m beset my missiles. I learn quick what my health bar is, and remember even quicker what the controls are—I already got hit by a missile straight out while I was admiring everything! :I
The UI is very simplistic and unobtrusive. The 'ESC' key brings you a set of 'Continue, Options, Controls, Exit' (wherein 'Exit' quits your game, something I note later on as VERY IMPORTANT).
Spoiler (click to show/hide)
Alright, whoever said in those Steam reviews that the controls are clunky and cueing a ton of more negativity, I’m all ‘wut o_o’ as I hold down my left mouse key and woosh all around with my WASD. I’ve tried the right mouse key, and it gives off a circular bomb emanating from my ship that destroys all enemies on screen. These controls are seamless, and the moment I stop pressing W/A/S/D, the aircraft stops right where I want it. I mean, look at my machine gun and secondary missiles! I can easily hold my mouse button down and I’m shooting like a 1942 fighter-bomber!
Of note: That tiny circle next to the meter—that’s the ‘bomb recharge’ button. You have an INFINITE amount of times to use that bomb, with the only drawback being that timer (and presumably a mark on your stat sheet, but it covers all games so…I’m unsure why it’s recorded overall, and seemingly only overall instead of per-game.)

That said, the gameplay hits me with a nostalgia reminiscent of the early shooter games (in space). Galaga, especially, for some reason. Maybe due to the ‘let’s fly around in style’ theme. I would like a backup plane though! Where’s that other plane in the hangar?

Spoiler (click to show/hide)
So onto "personal" hardcore mode, in which I practice the art of shooting, moving, and moving my little finger to the screenshot key. We’ve loot drops, signified by the tiny glowing gears meaning CASH $, we’ve the backdrop, animated as far as I see (look’it those tiny cars, continuing their work as an aerial war wages on!), and we’ve a nice feature—I have an alternative machine gun and missiles, the enemies either shoot in single fire or make airshows around me, that feature exists in when my bullets hit their bullets: My bullets *AND* missiles get cancelled in a nice brief spark while their own shots cruise on! Nice touch, probably countering the fact that all these enemies are pattern restricted. They must have such a disciplined CO. (There are two types of death animation—the enemy ship going down in smoke, or it exploding in grey steampunk smoke, both effects from machinegun fire and missile impact. There’s also that very subtle spark on impact when my bullets hit their craft. Detail~♥).

Spoiler (click to show/hide)
Eurgh, much like me…I guess. Those diagonal trails pictured here are enemy (missile) trails--helpful later on to track your position.
To another aspect: Music. The background music isn’t anything epic in the general battles. It’s a calm, some-what slow tune that contains a guitar, piano, and several other instruments, none of which being electric, rock, or metal in theme. Drums, percussion, woodwind, all are included and shift from scene to scene. My favorite. Though it did seem lighthearted accompaniment, I see how it doesn’t distract even the casual listener from focusing on the field in play.

Spoiler (click to show/hide)
And this static picture just tells half the story! This isn’t a death screen, it’s a death animation. I tried to take multiple screenshots but they don’t agree with each other to show it. What’s basically happening is a detailed ‘BAIL OUT, RED ALERT’ happening all through the aircraft, with red lights flashing and the plane wobbling as it seemingly goes down. There’s also that occasional cloud to remind you that you’re losing altitude. You don’t crash however, and I think it loops somewhere through the ambient (yet easy to listen to) alarm noises.
But…upon pressing Continue, I get sent back to the title screen! What’s the money for?...Oh, score. I thought there were upgrades.

Thinking ‘ah, no upgrades, that bumps my versatility a lot’, I wondered what the skies held for me (since I only played…3 minutes of it) and ventured on, calmly patting the camera strapped around my neck that he’d be used in times of safety—just not when my life was on the line.

Spoiler (click to show/hide)
Second lift-off, and I’m seeing…or actually not seeing what those negative reviews say. What clunky controls? The WASD fine motor skills enable me to shove my ship in that space between those slowly perpendicularly moving satellite-ish aircraft with rays of doom, that I can fire BOTH missiles at it and then dodge away in that split second moment before that ray touches my wing. I managed to do all that while having my hands outstretched and in my experience, that is where the clunky begins (See: Depleted health bar :I).
That, or I’m really taking the D:< in the steam reviews in the wrong and misinterpreted way, which I’ll cover later on.
==+==
==+==
Spoiler (click to show/hide)
The game is friendly to the casual gamer. It starts you off from stage 1. This is noted in the ending review because this is important.

The enemies are polite enough to woosh away from trying to kill you when the end is near. This telltale sign denotes the end of a stage/level: A bonus ‘wave’ or minigame occurs! They’re fun and as lighthearted as the most lighthearted thing present—the prize is bonus score! After the minigame, your ship flies forward and off screen, met with the roar of purified chemical thrusters moving farther away from you. A foretelling of ‘you have lived to the next level!’

Spoiler (click to show/hide)
Holy fishie! I thought there were no upgrades! (But that’s what you get for assuming and concluding, eh? You prejudge and mmph, personal embarrassment when you discover you judged too early.)
This needs a lot of refining despite the nice looks. No info on bonus upgrades or what they do is shown. I can hypothesize however, that the Gun+ = Gun damage, while the Bomb+ = Faster reload time.

Spoiler (click to show/hide)
When I think of the production of this game, I see the history of game development as well as the artistry behind it, and then enthrall myself in those abstract details-far-beyond-the-screen, that I busy myself with personal story writing instead of game review. But that’s just it: Knowing the backstory of how this game is made can lead the player to appreciate many other details than what is presented. Here’s stage 2, night play. The previous stage had 4 types of enemies, 2 of which didn’t shoot at you but went with the ol’ fly routine (and HIT THEM WITH OUR BODIES). Some things don’t change—they explode when they hit you. One of them is an aircraft-type while the other was that missile thing.

Spoiler (click to show/hide)
Not pictured here: My life at the start.
Your life does not get refilled in between stages (despite…somehow you getting back to base?).
It hit me that the title does poke you on SCORES and LEADERBOARDS, but it didn’t poke me this way considering all the detail build up. I started this night mission/stage 2 with the same 50% life like before! …And took 3 hits while screenshooting and firing at the same time.

I…uh, then died shortly afterwards. *ahem* Not because of my flying skills, no! I’m just a bad pilot.
Spoiler (click to show/hide)
But I played all this Offline on Steam—seemingly, nothing gets updated on the Scoreboard when you’re offline, other than the stats. Every time you exit the game, it marks it as a ‘takeoff’, which makes sense since it seems to be a survival-esque-till-you-drop theme.

Review Score: 7/10
My only qualm is refinement!
This game carries a lot of potential--something I plan to finish onto the further levels later on because of its simplicity (See, BoxesWithGuns, THIS IS HOW THINGS ARE DONE).
In concise statements: This game is a one-flight-fight (despite the...hangar cutscenes and upgrades. I have assumed our aircraft is made of unobtainum, hence our lacking death screen, and the lack of repairs), in which your damage carries over into each and every stage no matter where or when it was obtained. This is counteracted by your regenerating endless supply of ammunition and the shooter-glorified "bomb", which is just deterred by a cooldown timer! It is a test of skill and memory--as the enemy patterns and positions have little variance upon repeat runs.
Refinement and potential brings this game a load of space for expansion. Those helpful UI tips I mentioned earlier of toolboxes and tooltips would help spruce up the already-great atmosphere of the visuals, and the game could be improved to further much more upgrades, or perhaps a Campaign/story/interactive mode that would full out the shoot'em up features of this game, rather than just a presentable 'survival mode'.

All in all, this was a nice game in itself. Please check Steam reviews on Mixed ratings for their content and quality, and cross-compare them to positive ones! Discernment, efficacy, and critical thinking will help you sort out the specificity needed to infer what qualities these people are talking about.

The price is OK too, I think?
Quote
P165.95
in my currency, rounding to...about 3-4$. Around 4 days worth of savings for a college student like me. But considering the state of the game itself at this moment, it's nice--I lack the experience to add 'but there are better ones out there for the same price//you're better off saving for[...]', because I can see great potential within this game. The only drawback is I am uncertain if it will receive an expansion; I can't justify why I feel that way though. :P
« Last Edit: January 23, 2016, 03:33:02 pm by Tiruin »
Logged

Sappho

  • Bay Watcher
  • AKA Aira; Legendary Female Gamer
    • View Profile
    • Aira Plays Games
Re: Sappho's “Happy” New Year Blowout Giveaway - PRIZES AWARDED!
« Reply #175 on: January 23, 2016, 03:41:46 pm »

Boooooo breakdowns! Yaaaayyyy feeling better! And that is QUITE a review. Glad you managed to get it finished in the end. You are officially OFF of the wall of shame, and your voting rights and extra votes due to winning honorable mention are hereby RESTORED. Round of applause to Tiruin! :D

The same will go for anyone else who wishes to submit a late review... Nudge, nudge. ;)

Tiruin

  • Bay Watcher
  • Life is too short for worries
    • View Profile
Re: Sappho's “Happy” New Year Blowout Giveaway - PRIZES AWARDED!
« Reply #176 on: January 23, 2016, 03:59:21 pm »

Boooooo breakdowns! Yaaaayyyy feeling better! And that is QUITE a review. Glad you managed to get it finished in the end. You are officially OFF of the wall of shame, and your voting rights and extra votes due to winning honorable mention are hereby RESTORED. [...]
Seriously remembering that Spongebob episode now. xD But really, thanks a ton for the cheeriness & formatting here c: Helps a lot! :))
Once the nominations have been made, EVERYONE who participated in the giveaway and is not in the Hall of Shame will get a vote. Those with honorable mentions will get THREE votes. Once the results are in, I will make video reviews of the top THREE choices.

Winners, you may begin your nominations. Please do so as soon as possible so we can get the voting underway. I will also send this information to the winners by PM.
Muhwahwaaa~ I get to influence and spare your soul you from reviewing bad stuff! :D
Mutual Victory!

Query! Is it possible to spread-vote for those who have more than one vote? Can there be decimal points? (like 1.5 vote goes to {x} while 1.5 goes to {y}) :P
The former question was serious. The latter was me being silly.
Logged

Sappho

  • Bay Watcher
  • AKA Aira; Legendary Female Gamer
    • View Profile
    • Aira Plays Games
Re: Sappho's “Happy” New Year Blowout Giveaway - PRIZES AWARDED!
« Reply #177 on: January 23, 2016, 04:10:49 pm »

Each vote may be cast individually (so you can put three votes on one game, or one each on three different games, etc.). But they may not be split. That would be cruel and also introduce more math than I am capable of handling. ;)

So far it doesn't look like I'll need to be rescued from anything... The nominations so far all seem quite kind. You dorfs are all such forgiving souls... :D That said, I am fully ready and willing to play and review a terrible game if it makes you all smile. ;)

Darkmere

  • Bay Watcher
  • Exploding me won't bring back your honey.
    • View Profile
Re: Sappho's “Happy” New Year Blowout Giveaway - PRIZES AWARDED!
« Reply #178 on: January 23, 2016, 04:59:51 pm »

Each vote may be cast individually (so you can put three votes on one game, or one each on three different games, etc.). But they may not be split. That would be cruel and also introduce more math than I am capable of handling. ;)

So far it doesn't look like I'll need to be rescued from anything... The nominations so far all seem quite kind. You dorfs are all such forgiving souls... :D That said, I am fully ready and willing to play and review a terrible game if it makes you all smile. ;)

Oh, the sadistic part of me was *this close* to nominating Tower of Guns for you. Don't get me wrong, the game is awesome and I love it, but it's about the worst thing I noticed on the list that I could probably pick to have you play. I'd... still probably definitely vote for it if someone else nominated it though... nudge nudge.
Logged
And then, they will be weaponized. Like everything in this game, from kittens to babies, everything is a potential device of murder.
So if baseless speculation is all we have, we might as well treat it like fact.

Tiruin

  • Bay Watcher
  • Life is too short for worries
    • View Profile
Re: Sappho's “Happy” New Year Blowout Giveaway - PRIZES AWARDED!
« Reply #179 on: January 23, 2016, 05:14:24 pm »

I nominate The Elder Scrolls III: Moro- no, but you should play more of that. Only six hours on record? For shame.

What you have to keep in mind is that six hours is about two weeks of gaming time for me. I'm literally too busy to play games. Lately I play almost exclusively casual games, because they're the only thing I can get into - I don't have a big chunk of time to sit down, learn how to play, and get immersed in a larger game. :(
Story of my gaming life here x_x
Glad I'm a fast learner, or I wouldn't have been able to pull off...mostly anything I can actually accomplish today. Also glad nobody else is poking at my review :P

Thanks for the drama-bomb prize, by the way. I had fun writing the reviews, glad someone enjoyed reading them.
I wonder if there're links to everyone's revi-oh wait I can just type the titles in the search engine.

...Reading all of those reviews: Wow. You people. :D
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 10 11 [12] 13 14 ... 16