Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 10 11 [12] 13 14 ... 43

Author Topic: Star Wars: The Force Awakens Discussion Thread (spoilers, obviously)  (Read 57870 times)

dwarfhoplite

  • Bay Watcher
  • Gentledwarves, prepare for Glory!
    • View Profile
Re: Star Wars: The Force Awakens Discussion Thread (spoilers, obviously)
« Reply #165 on: December 30, 2015, 06:38:56 pm »

Some people say that force-reading mind was a new trick, but I recall Vader saying to Luke something about Luke's feelings having betrayed to Vader that Leia is Luke's sister.
Logged

Starver

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Star Wars: The Force Awakens Discussion Thread (spoilers, obviously)
« Reply #166 on: December 30, 2015, 07:09:51 pm »

Some people say that force-reading mind was a new trick, but I recall Vader saying to Luke something about Luke's feelings having betrayed to Vader that Leia is Luke's sister.
I'm sure that if I dug up the original D6 Star Wars RPG materials (none of this D20 nonsense!) that it was already a (semi-canon) thing way back then.

There's a possible difference, though.  Vader just felt around the shape of Luke's active mind, and/or even heard and interpreted its unrestrained broadcasts of emotion and symbolism, while Ren seems to like pushing and prodding and stabbing around to discover information within the heads of the unwilling (which Vader didn't seem to do with Leia, hence bringing in the Torture-Droid).
« Last Edit: December 30, 2015, 07:11:41 pm by Starver »
Logged

Sirus

  • Bay Watcher
  • Resident trucker/goddess/ex-president.
    • View Profile
Re: Star Wars: The Force Awakens Discussion Thread (spoilers, obviously)
« Reply #167 on: December 30, 2015, 07:15:31 pm »

Some people say that force-reading mind was a new trick, but I recall Vader saying to Luke something about Luke's feelings having betrayed to Vader that Leia is Luke's sister.
I'm sure that if I dug up the original D6 Star Wars RPG materials (none of this D20 nonsense!) that it was already a (semi-canon) thing way back then.

There's a possible difference, though.  Vader just felt around the shape of Luke's active mind, and/or even heard and interpreted its unrestrained broadcasts of emotion and symbolism, while Ren seems to like pushing and prodding and stabbing around to discover information within the heads of the unwilling.
I bet that if Luke were restrained, Vader would be able to do the probe-y thing as well.
Logged
Quote from: Max White
And lo! Sirus did drive his mighty party truck unto Vegas, and it was good.

Star Wars: Age of Rebellion OOC Thread

Shadow of the Demon Lord - OOC Thread - IC Thread

TheBiggerFish

  • Bay Watcher
  • Somewhere around here.
    • View Profile
Re: Star Wars: The Force Awakens Discussion Thread (spoilers, obviously)
« Reply #168 on: December 30, 2015, 07:30:42 pm »

Psychology?
Logged
Sigtext

It has been determined that Trump is an average unladen swallow travelling northbound at his maximum sustainable speed of -3 Obama-cubits per second in the middle of a class 3 hurricane.

mainiac

  • Bay Watcher
  • Na vazeal kwah-kai
    • View Profile
Re: Star Wars: The Force Awakens Discussion Thread (spoilers, obviously)
« Reply #169 on: December 30, 2015, 07:33:25 pm »

I think Vadar could read Luke because it was a strong emotion he was actively thinking about.  Leia was a very good liar however.  Maybe cuz Luke was a farm boy and she was a lifelong politician :p  That was I think the point of the torture, to try and make her reveal herself through emotions.
Logged
Ancient Babylonian god of RAEG
--------------
[CAN_INTERNET]
[PREFSTRING:google]
"Don't tell me what you value. Show me your budget and I will tell you what you value"
« Last Edit: February 10, 1988, 03:27:23 pm by UR MOM »
mainiac is always a little sarcastic, at least.

Sirus

  • Bay Watcher
  • Resident trucker/goddess/ex-president.
    • View Profile
Re: Star Wars: The Force Awakens Discussion Thread (spoilers, obviously)
« Reply #170 on: December 30, 2015, 07:36:39 pm »

Then why didn't he on Leia? He wasted time with a "truth serum" on her at the start of 4.
He tried. He said something to Tarkin along the lines of "her resistance to the mind probe is considerable".

...which now that I think about it, might have been some pretty good foreshadowing :o
Logged
Quote from: Max White
And lo! Sirus did drive his mighty party truck unto Vegas, and it was good.

Star Wars: Age of Rebellion OOC Thread

Shadow of the Demon Lord - OOC Thread - IC Thread

Kot

  • Bay Watcher
  • 2 Patriotic 4 U
    • View Profile
    • Tiny Pixel Soldiers
Re: Star Wars: The Force Awakens Discussion Thread (spoilers, obviously)
« Reply #171 on: December 30, 2015, 07:39:17 pm »

Rey confirmed for incestous child of Luke and Leia.
Logged
Kot finishes his morning routine in the same way he always does, by burning a scale replica of Saint Basil's Cathedral on the windowsill.

mainiac

  • Bay Watcher
  • Na vazeal kwah-kai
    • View Profile
Re: Star Wars: The Force Awakens Discussion Thread (spoilers, obviously)
« Reply #172 on: December 30, 2015, 07:43:14 pm »

...which now that I think about it, might have been some pretty good foreshadowing :o

I dont think Lucas had come up with the idea of Leia as Lukes sister yet.  I might be wrong.
Logged
Ancient Babylonian god of RAEG
--------------
[CAN_INTERNET]
[PREFSTRING:google]
"Don't tell me what you value. Show me your budget and I will tell you what you value"
« Last Edit: February 10, 1988, 03:27:23 pm by UR MOM »
mainiac is always a little sarcastic, at least.

Sirus

  • Bay Watcher
  • Resident trucker/goddess/ex-president.
    • View Profile
Re: Star Wars: The Force Awakens Discussion Thread (spoilers, obviously)
« Reply #173 on: December 30, 2015, 08:32:54 pm »

...which now that I think about it, might have been some pretty good foreshadowing :o

I dont think Lucas had come up with the idea of Leia as Lukes sister yet.  I might be wrong.
I have no idea myself. If it was intentional, kudos to Lucas.
Logged
Quote from: Max White
And lo! Sirus did drive his mighty party truck unto Vegas, and it was good.

Star Wars: Age of Rebellion OOC Thread

Shadow of the Demon Lord - OOC Thread - IC Thread

Urist McScoopbeard

  • Bay Watcher
  • Damnit Scoopz!
    • View Profile
Re: Star Wars: The Force Awakens Discussion Thread (spoilers, obviously)
« Reply #174 on: December 30, 2015, 09:59:18 pm »

How do you guys feel about the final Lightsaber duel. I thought it was pretty well done... Besides the obvious crudeness of if it feels more believable with more thrusts, slower parries, and marked with a messiness of a gritty, desperate fight. Thoughts?
Logged
This conversation is getting disturbing fast, disturbingly erotic.

Sirus

  • Bay Watcher
  • Resident trucker/goddess/ex-president.
    • View Profile
Re: Star Wars: The Force Awakens Discussion Thread (spoilers, obviously)
« Reply #175 on: December 30, 2015, 10:01:29 pm »

I would need to see it again, but I seem to remember that it was pretty good. More like the lightsaber battles of the original trilogy.
Logged
Quote from: Max White
And lo! Sirus did drive his mighty party truck unto Vegas, and it was good.

Star Wars: Age of Rebellion OOC Thread

Shadow of the Demon Lord - OOC Thread - IC Thread

NRDL

  • Bay Watcher
  • I Actually Like Elves
    • View Profile
Re: Star Wars: The Force Awakens Discussion Thread (spoilers, obviously)
« Reply #176 on: December 31, 2015, 04:42:02 am »

Definitely a nice return to form.  Always preferred OTrilogy-kendo to Trilogy-Ballet fencing, visually anyway.  In my mind, the original trilogy's lightsaber fights were less about the fights and more about how they expressed the characters, and showed their development.  As nice as the Prequel lightsaber forms and choreography was, the fights as physical manifestations of their emotions and ideologies is just so much more satisfying.   
Logged
GOD DAMN IT NRDL.
NRDL will roll a die and decide how sadistic and insane he's feeling well you do.

Ghills

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Star Wars: The Force Awakens Discussion Thread (spoilers, obviously)
« Reply #177 on: December 31, 2015, 03:18:08 pm »

So apparently, the novelization sheds a lot of light on the state of the Republic and the Resistance.

Ack, I hate that.  Star Wars always had a huge problem with spreading vital info across multiple sources. I hoped binning the EU, as traumatic as it was, was a sign that Disney was going to be more coherent.  Looks like they're going to keep pulling the same tricks so that people have to buy multiple things just to understand what's happening.
Logged
I AM POINTY DEATH INCARNATE
Ye know, being an usurper overseer gone mad with power isn't too bad. It's honestly not that different from being a normal overseer.
To summarize:
They do an epic face. If that fails, they beat said object to death with their beard.

ragnar119

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Star Wars: The Force Awakens Discussion Thread (spoilers, obviously)
« Reply #178 on: December 31, 2015, 04:19:09 pm »

...which now that I think about it, might have been some pretty good foreshadowing :o

I dont think Lucas had come up with the idea of Leia as Lukes sister yet.  I might be wrong.

Yes you are correct. He didnt had a planed out story or better said trilogy. He thought out that later after huge success of first movie.
Logged

RedKing

  • Bay Watcher
  • hoo hoo motherfucker
    • View Profile
Re: Star Wars: The Force Awakens Discussion Thread (spoilers, obviously)
« Reply #179 on: December 31, 2015, 06:57:20 pm »

So apparently Lucas is now giving his opinion on the new movie, and has said that selling the rights to Disney was like "selling his kids to white slavers".

So my takeaway from that is that George Lucas would sell his kids to white slavers for $4 billion. Because it's not like they held a gun to this head, and he sure didn't haven't any complaints when he was counting those greenbacks.

Logged

Remember, knowledge is power. The power to make other people feel stupid.
Quote from: Neil DeGrasse Tyson
Science is like an inoculation against charlatans who would have you believe whatever it is they tell you.
Pages: 1 ... 10 11 [12] 13 14 ... 43