You're quoting a quote within the thing you're citing. I hope you realize that.
One of the nih.gov citations was also citing another study. That's not a refutation.
Quote from the same guy in the same article.
Also not a refutation.
Doesn't seem too awful; then again, all of these are injected through proper medical administrative techniques;
I'm not sure what your point is. The subject of this discussion is "what happens when antibiotics no longer work?" Not "should we eliminate doctors?"
If you have a cold, no don't drink a gallon of hydrogen peroxide. If you're going to
die from an infection during an era after after antibacterials no longer work, then yes, local injection of suitably diluted hydrogen peroxide might be a thing that the medical profession could find to be a suitable replacement treatment.
if you're advocating inhaling ozone as a health treatment, you're mad.
I'm pointing out that there are antimicrobial agents that will continue to be effective after widespread development of bacterial resistance to antibacterials. My thesis here is "if pharmaceuticals stop working, there are other things that kill bacteria. We can probably use them, I don't think it will be a big deal." Not "close one eye and use one hand to type your symptoms into a google search box and self administer the first one you find."
Also, I'd like to throw in my own quote: "Ozone exposure results in an acute decrease in the serum levels of thyroid hormones. Physiologic sequelae of this are unclear. Whereas thyroid hormone supplementation appears to benefit pulmonary function in septic, oxyradical models of injury, thyroid hormone increases ozone toxicity." from here.
Yes, and prescription drugs routinely have side effects and chemotherapy can kill you. Yet doctors regularly prescribe these when appropriate. If "has side effects" is a deal-breaker for you, then go read some prescription drug side effect warnings. Apply proper countermeasures when justified. If you're going to die from an infection in an era where antibiotics no longer work, temporary hormonal imbalances seem like a perfectly acceptable alternative.
Imagine you're going to die from a staph infection and the antibiotic you're offered gives you nausea, loss of bladder control and mild intestinal bleeding. Are you going to turn it down? I don't think so.
Why are you applying a different standard to non-antibiotic treatments?
silver allergies are a real thing. Might work, but certainly not on everyone.
*shrug* Ok, and?
Are you really so determined to find excuses to object over that "oh, well it might not work for everybody" is a thing you're seriously saying?