Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 32 33 [34] 35

Author Topic: Arms Race: 1780 - Atterton Monarchy -1782 Revision Phase  (Read 36331 times)

flazeo25

  • Bay Watcher
  • Nightmare Eater
    • View Profile
Re: Arms Race: 1780 - Atterton Monarchy -1782 Revision Phase
« Reply #495 on: December 11, 2015, 08:56:00 pm »

Define infiltration.
Making our spy pretend to be a engineer?
Logged

Kashyyk

  • Bay Watcher
  • One letter short of a wookie
    • View Profile
Re: Arms Race: 1780 - Atterton Monarchy -1782 Revision Phase
« Reply #496 on: December 11, 2015, 08:58:12 pm »

What would you be hoping to accomplish with that?
Logged

Kashyyk

  • Bay Watcher
  • One letter short of a wookie
    • View Profile
Re: Arms Race: 1780 - Atterton Monarchy -1782 Revision Phase
« Reply #497 on: December 12, 2015, 09:15:52 am »

To save time:

Steal British Cannons
Produce more Am-Mulard:B
Focus on Montgomery and Nelson

This is the only suggestion I have actually seen with any backing at all. I'm not gonna go ahead with it without some more though.
Logged

Graknorke

  • Bay Watcher
  • A bomb's a bad choice for close-range combat.
    • View Profile
Re: Arms Race: 1780 - Atterton Monarchy -1782 Revision Phase
« Reply #498 on: December 12, 2015, 09:27:01 am »

So we're submitting all 3 actions at once?

In that case I'd agree with cherry apart from the focus, where I think we should put one of our focus actions towards taking some of the sea back from the loyalists.
Logged
Cultural status:
Depleted          ☐
Enriched          ☑

Kashyyk

  • Bay Watcher
  • One letter short of a wookie
    • View Profile
Re: Arms Race: 1780 - Atterton Monarchy -1782 Revision Phase
« Reply #499 on: December 12, 2015, 09:57:40 am »

If you're all happy with all of them, yes. Otherwise I'll stop at the one people are disagreeing on..
Logged

Hawk132

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Arms Race: 1780 - Atterton Monarchy -1782 Revision Phase
« Reply #500 on: December 12, 2015, 12:08:32 pm »

To save time:

Steal British Cannons
Produce more Am-Mulard:B
Focus on Montgomery and Nelson
Sure then newer 6 ponders might help we can always make trader ship next revision. +1
+1.
Logged
Perplexicon: A New Arena - Abandoned, but feel free to give it a read.

Beneviento

  • Bay Watcher
  • Rocks and Blocks
    • View Profile
Re: Arms Race: 1780 - Atterton Monarchy -1782 Revision Phase
« Reply #501 on: December 12, 2015, 02:52:04 pm »

To save time:

Steal British Cannons
Produce more Am-Mulard:B
Focus on Montgomery and Nelson
Sure then newer 6 ponders might help we can always make trader ship next revision. +1
+1.
+1
Logged
And any man who may be asked in this century what he did to make his life worthwhile, I think can respond with a good deal of pride and satisfaction: 'I served in the Assaulted Lanterns Magma Artillery' - King Id I of the Assaulted Lanterns

Kashyyk

  • Bay Watcher
  • One letter short of a wookie
    • View Profile
Re: Arms Race: 1780 - Atterton Monarchy -1782 Revision Phase
« Reply #502 on: December 12, 2015, 06:12:22 pm »

Alright,  unless everyone has a change of heart I will lock that in tomorrow morning and start working on the turn.
Logged

Kashyyk

  • Bay Watcher
  • One letter short of a wookie
    • View Profile
Re: Arms Race: 1780 - Atterton Monarchy -1782 Revision Phase
« Reply #503 on: December 13, 2015, 11:54:38 am »

Alright the following is locked in:

Steal British Cannons
Produce more Am-Mulard:B
Focus on Montgomery and Nelson

Begin Future Planning
Logged

Graknorke

  • Bay Watcher
  • A bomb's a bad choice for close-range combat.
    • View Profile
Re: Arms Race: 1780 - Atterton Monarchy -1782 Revision Phase
« Reply #504 on: December 13, 2015, 07:39:05 pm »

Do you know what we need? Some fast-firing weapons that aren't air rifles. I was thinking something with superposed loads/cartridges. We could do it as a modification of the Brown Bess probably, just with multiple chained locks further along the barrel.

And Ft. Combe might be starting to split up this year, I wonder how that goes.
Logged
Cultural status:
Depleted          ☐
Enriched          ☑

evilcherry

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Arms Race: 1780 - Atterton Monarchy -1782 Revision Phase
« Reply #505 on: December 14, 2015, 12:15:08 am »

Do you know what we need? Some fast-firing weapons that aren't air rifles. I was thinking something with superposed loads/cartridges. We could do it as a modification of the Brown Bess probably, just with multiple chained locks further along the barrel.

And Ft. Combe might be starting to split up this year, I wonder how that goes.
Nah the rifled Bess is working well enough, except for cost. At least not something as complicated as a superposed muzzleloader.
We really need a cavalry weapon, so why not a multibarrel carbine or a pepperbox, or, a revolver?

Graknorke

  • Bay Watcher
  • A bomb's a bad choice for close-range combat.
    • View Profile
Re: Arms Race: 1780 - Atterton Monarchy -1782 Revision Phase
« Reply #506 on: December 14, 2015, 11:20:37 am »

Isn't the Samara slower to reload than the Bess? A pepperbox carbine would be pretty good though. Proper revolvers are going to be sketchy until we get integrated cartridges.
Logged
Cultural status:
Depleted          ☐
Enriched          ☑

flazeo25

  • Bay Watcher
  • Nightmare Eater
    • View Profile
Re: Arms Race: 1780 - Atterton Monarchy -1782 Revision Phase
« Reply #507 on: December 14, 2015, 11:30:48 am »

Isn't the Samara slower to reload than the Bess? A pepperbox carbine would be pretty good though. Proper revolvers are going to be sketchy until we get integrated cartridges.
Well we could go with newer rifle and try to make a breechloader one?
Logged

Graknorke

  • Bay Watcher
  • A bomb's a bad choice for close-range combat.
    • View Profile
Re: Arms Race: 1780 - Atterton Monarchy -1782 Revision Phase
« Reply #508 on: December 14, 2015, 12:03:35 pm »

Could we apply our knowledge of dealing with pressure from the air rifle in order to help deal with sealing the breech of a breech-loader? It seems like the understanding of one should help with the other, but I don't really know for sure.
Logged
Cultural status:
Depleted          ☐
Enriched          ☑

flazeo25

  • Bay Watcher
  • Nightmare Eater
    • View Profile
Re: Arms Race: 1780 - Atterton Monarchy -1782 Revision Phase
« Reply #509 on: December 14, 2015, 12:21:58 pm »

Could we apply our knowledge of dealing with pressure from the air rifle in order to help deal with sealing the breech of a breech-loader? It seems like the understanding of one should help with the other, but I don't really know for sure.

Well we need to add interrupting screw to the breach-loader for rifles or metallic caritages for smaller guns which wouldn't be too much, we also have rifling tech which is pretty handy for this.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 32 33 [34] 35