Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 24 25 [26] 27 28 ... 35

Author Topic: Arms Race: 1780 - Atterton Monarchy -1782 Revision Phase  (Read 36463 times)

flazeo25

  • Bay Watcher
  • Nightmare Eater
    • View Profile
Re: Arms Race: 1780 - Atterton Monarchy -1782 Design Phase
« Reply #375 on: December 01, 2015, 11:25:23 am »

flazeo I think you need to tame your steam fetish. We already have steam engines so can apply them to stuff we design.

And my preferred design is still on the cable carts, or else something to improve resources.

I asked Zan and that steam only works for our shitty boat.
Logged

Graknorke

  • Bay Watcher
  • A bomb's a bad choice for close-range combat.
    • View Profile
Re: Arms Race: 1780 - Atterton Monarchy -1782 Design Phase
« Reply #376 on: December 01, 2015, 11:31:15 am »

Well it depends on if we have to specify in a phase what the engine will be used for, or if it'll automatically be put to use in places like factories, mines etc.
Logged
Cultural status:
Depleted          ☐
Enriched          ☑

evilcherry

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Arms Race: 1780 - Atterton Monarchy -1782 Design Phase
« Reply #377 on: December 01, 2015, 11:32:08 am »

flazeo I think you need to tame your steam fetish. We already have steam engines so can apply them to stuff we design.

And my preferred design is still on the cable carts, or else something to improve resources.

I asked Zan and that steam only works for our shitty boat.
Invoke GM clarification.

Suppose we wanted to build steam-powered cable railways now.
1. Is it a Design or a Revise action?
2. Do our steamboat expertise actually provide enough, ahem, steam power for our project (so we enjoy a bonus from rolls or effectiveness)?
3. Do we need to explicitly develop steam-powered industrial machinery?

flazeo25

  • Bay Watcher
  • Nightmare Eater
    • View Profile
Re: Arms Race: 1780 - Atterton Monarchy -1782 Design Phase
« Reply #378 on: December 01, 2015, 12:12:46 pm »

flazeo I think you need to tame your steam fetish. We already have steam engines so can apply them to stuff we design.

And my preferred design is still on the cable carts, or else something to improve resources.

I asked Zan and that steam only works for our shitty boat.
Invoke GM clarification.

Suppose we wanted to build steam-powered cable railways now.
1. Is it a Design or a Revise action?
2. Do our steamboat expertise actually provide enough, ahem, steam power for our project (so we enjoy a bonus from rolls or effectiveness)?
3. Do we need to explicitly develop steam-powered industrial machinery?
I'm finding out know what possible also should we have somone in charge of propaganda?
Logged

Snake1229

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Arms Race: 1780 - Atterton Monarchy -1782 Design Phase
« Reply #379 on: December 01, 2015, 12:14:22 pm »

Im just gonna not join in the steam discussion, and I do think we should have someone in charge of propaganda, I could help with it though
Logged

flazeo25

  • Bay Watcher
  • Nightmare Eater
    • View Profile
Re: Arms Race: 1780 - Atterton Monarchy -1782 Design Phase
« Reply #380 on: December 01, 2015, 12:20:02 pm »

Im just gonna not join in the steam discussion, and I do think we should have someone in charge of propaganda, I could help with it though
Any ideas on what type of propaganda, images, newspaper style .etc
Logged

Snake1229

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Arms Race: 1780 - Atterton Monarchy -1782 Design Phase
« Reply #381 on: December 01, 2015, 01:49:12 pm »

Im just gonna not join in the steam discussion, and I do think we should have someone in charge of propaganda, I could help with it though
Any ideas on what type of propaganda, images, newspaper style .etc
It would probably be a newspaper in this eara
Logged

tntey

  • Bay Watcher
  • Likes Fishbone for its ska
    • View Profile
Re: Arms Race: 1780 - Atterton Monarchy -1782 Design Phase
« Reply #382 on: December 01, 2015, 02:10:46 pm »

Flyers saying how glorious it would be for people to join our millitary
Logged
Speaking of lowest intelligence, that reminds me of the fact that it's probably your first time in prison. Don't worry, I can give you some tips, having spent some time in a few myself. The best way to make friends here is to drop the soap during shower time. Try it, I'm sure you'll love making friends like that!

flazeo25

  • Bay Watcher
  • Nightmare Eater
    • View Profile
Re: Arms Race: 1780 - Atterton Monarchy -1782 Design Phase
« Reply #383 on: December 01, 2015, 02:56:26 pm »

Flyers saying how glorious it would be for people to join our millitary

So a uncle sam sort of thing. that be funny
Logged

Zanzetkuken The Great

  • Bay Watcher
  • The Wizard Dragon
    • View Profile
Re: Arms Race: 1780 - Atterton Monarchy -1782 Design Phase
« Reply #384 on: December 01, 2015, 03:57:24 pm »

Suppose we wanted to build steam-powered cable railways now.
1. Is it a Design or a Revise action?
2. Do our steamboat expertise actually provide enough, ahem, steam power for our project (so we enjoy a bonus from rolls or effectiveness)?
3. Do we need to explicitly develop steam-powered industrial machinery?

Design.  What's been described is way too much for a revision.
There would be a minor bonus from general knowledge.
In order to power factories, yes.
Logged
Quote from: Eric Blank
It's Zanzetkuken The Great. He's a goddamn wizard-dragon. He will make it so, and it will forever be.
Quote from: 2016 Election IRC
<DozebomLolumzalis> you filthy god-damn ninja wizard dragon

Beneviento

  • Bay Watcher
  • Rocks and Blocks
    • View Profile
Re: Arms Race: 1780 - Atterton Monarchy -1782 Design Phase
« Reply #385 on: December 01, 2015, 04:03:04 pm »

Pardon me if I sound a bit dense, but what advantage would a breech loading cannon have over muzzle loaders? It seems like it would be pretty slow to place and remove the rear plate.

Even if loading is only marginally faster, we still gain because it will require a smaller crew and be easier to maintain/clean, and therefore it will be more reliable. Also, loading a muzzleloader is an involved business, so I think our gain in speed will be more than marginal. Finally, we could use a 3-pounder for expense reasons, so why not have it be breech loading?
Logged
And any man who may be asked in this century what he did to make his life worthwhile, I think can respond with a good deal of pride and satisfaction: 'I served in the Assaulted Lanterns Magma Artillery' - King Id I of the Assaulted Lanterns

Graknorke

  • Bay Watcher
  • A bomb's a bad choice for close-range combat.
    • View Profile
Re: Arms Race: 1780 - Atterton Monarchy -1782 Design Phase
« Reply #386 on: December 01, 2015, 04:33:37 pm »

Well in light of what we know about how technology is applied, I think that we should go for developing steam powered industrial machinery. I'm not convinced on the idea of a V twin steam engine, but inline would be fine.
Logged
Cultural status:
Depleted          ☐
Enriched          ☑

flazeo25

  • Bay Watcher
  • Nightmare Eater
    • View Profile
Re: Arms Race: 1780 - Atterton Monarchy -1782 Design Phase
« Reply #387 on: December 01, 2015, 05:06:20 pm »

Well in light of what we know about how technology is applied, I think that we should go for developing steam powered industrial machinery. I'm not convinced on the idea of a V twin steam engine, but inline would be fine.

I wonder would we be able to use revise things like Grand Engineering Halls or The Hall of Production if we got steam.
Logged

evilcherry

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Arms Race: 1780 - Atterton Monarchy -1782 Design Phase
« Reply #388 on: December 01, 2015, 08:28:36 pm »

Im just gonna not join in the steam discussion, and I do think we should have someone in charge of propaganda, I could help with it though
Any ideas on what type of propaganda, images, newspaper style .etc
It would probably be a newspaper in this eara
Please also note that "Common Sense" was a Pamphlet in this era. English was a very long-winded business indeed.

Snake1229

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Arms Race: 1780 - Atterton Monarchy -1782 Design Phase
« Reply #389 on: December 02, 2015, 10:27:38 pm »

Pardon me if I sound a bit dense, but what advantage would a breech loading cannon have over muzzle loaders? It seems like it would be pretty slow to place and remove the rear plate.

Even if loading is only marginally faster, we still gain because it will require a smaller crew and be easier to maintain/clean, and therefore it will be more reliable. Also, loading a muzzleloader is an involved business, so I think our gain in speed will be more than marginal. Finally, we could use a 3-pounder for expense reasons, so why not have it be breech loading?
Breech loading isn't currently possible, and even if it is, it would be very innifficient without shells, do to the fact you can't really put a cannonball inside a tube without it falling out one side.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 24 25 [26] 27 28 ... 35