PFP
Good one. No, not that name either. 
I think if you're going to claim, you need to make it count. Something game-changing. Like if you were immune to converts, had a day-kill, or your ability proved that someone else's claimed role could not exist by its own existance. Typically none of these examples are useful for using day 1 either, though.
Interesting distinction there. So he could have a power that only works on VTs? Or wincon requiring/preventing the survival of any VTs?
My thoughts are that I still need to make my reads list, using this new data. I can't focus enough for that @ work, though.
I'm disinclined to speculate on another player's role on D1. TDS might have been soft-claiming, might have a power-role, or he might just be the CL messing us about.
I'm going to vote flabort, 'cause I think his questions have been quite shallow so far, as though he's trying to look like he's contributing, but doesn't actually really want to add anything to the game.
Ok. If that's how you feel. What do you think contributing looks like? Is there anyone else also not contributing (cough*tntey*cough), or asking deep enough questions? Why do you feel that way?
I didn't expect to get through the game without getting at least one vote. This doesn't bother me. But I am curious if I'm your pnly suspect right now?
That question could be rephrased as "is this a serious vote, or are you only trying to see how I react?" so... you won't mind if I don't answer it
Contributions would be anything that advances the game, and helps with scum-hunting.
The most significant instance of you appearing to not do that was shortly after
fillipk's alleged fishing.
You made three posts after it:
-
#1 shortly before Megas pointed it out, though you said you didn't have much time to do anything beyond what you did, which was say how much priority we should put on discussing scum strats vs scum-hunting, and commenting on CW's answer to which role he might prefer.
- Then
#2 about three hours afterward, in which you make no mention of fillipk's activity, despite it being (probably) the most significant thing to happen in the game to that point.
Four other players had made comments about it and voted fillipk, and your only comments to fillipk were asking him about his thoughts regarding an answer to an RVS question FoU had asked you, and then asking a hypothetical question about the cult that I... don't see as being very useful.
You also reminded me to answer a question about scum strats, and asking FoU about what he thinks his analysis skills are like.
- In
#3 you mention that you think fillipk likes to read a lot into flavour text (which, while interesting, doesn't necessarily help with scum-hunting) then play down your experience and skills. After which you imply you might agree with fillipk. (do you?)
You don't really comment on what fillipk does directly, as though you don't want anything that can be tied back to you in case he gets lynched and flips town.
Your second post of the three was probably the most odd, seeing as he has three people voting for him and almost every post was referencing him. Indeed, the posts between your first and third were referring to fillipk in one way or another, so I just find it really bizarre that you don't comment on it.
Author
Topic: A Game of Clones: Game Over, Town-Cult Draw! (Read 51543 times)