Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 [2] 3

Author Topic: A second question about castles.  (Read 2743 times)

Elephant Parade

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: A second question about castles.
« Reply #15 on: October 30, 2015, 07:51:14 pm »

Another question: if you were the lord of a castle, what type of person would you be?
Logged

Tomasque

  • Bay Watcher
  • Gonna one-up FoU - with an FG in my personal text!
    • View Profile
Re: A second question about castles.
« Reply #16 on: October 30, 2015, 09:00:00 pm »

A manipulative, machiovelian king with a loving-but-firm image.
Logged
The quantum cannonball hits you in the face and misses!
Money!
GENERATION grisha5: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.

Megggas

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: A second question about castles.
« Reply #17 on: October 30, 2015, 09:04:30 pm »

A lazy guy who sits around enjoying the luxuries of royal life while my underlings take care of all the important stuff.
Logged
Due to Real Life reasons, I have to disappear for awhile.  Take me out of all games that I'm participating in.  Sorry.

Nosaneinme

  • Bay Watcher
  • It time to play
    • View Profile
Re: A second question about castles.
« Reply #18 on: October 30, 2015, 09:06:02 pm »

Being the Patrician whom answer his citzens with much show and plaise
Logged

Coolrune206

  • Bay Watcher
  • Come on, just a taste of your soul?
    • View Profile
Re: A second question about castles.
« Reply #19 on: October 30, 2015, 10:13:59 pm »

I'd be a money-tight ruler with high taxes and no wiggle room for his citizens. Not paying taxes or breaking the laws of the land would result in public imprisonment or execution.
Logged
"You are a shameful gaggle of cowards who has made a mockery of the challenge, but you have avoided death. Sit and eat."

BFEL

  • Bay Watcher
  • Tail of a stinging scorpion scourge
    • View Profile
Re: A second question about castles.
« Reply #20 on: October 30, 2015, 10:32:17 pm »

A manipulative, machiovelian king with a loving-but-firm image.
+1
Logged
7/10 Has much more memorable sigs but casts them to the realm of sigtexts.

Indeed, I do this.

Nunzillor

  • Guest
Re: A second question about castles.
« Reply #21 on: October 30, 2015, 11:05:40 pm »

A lazy guy who sits around enjoying the luxuries of royal life while my underlings take care of all the important stuff.
+1
Logged

Elephant Parade

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: A second question about castles.
« Reply #22 on: October 30, 2015, 11:25:27 pm »

A lazy guy who sits around enjoying the luxuries of royal life while my underlings take care of all the important stuff.
+1
A manipulative, machiovelian king with a loving-but-firm image.
+1
That isn't an answer.
Logged

Nunzillor

  • Guest
Re: A second question about castles.
« Reply #23 on: October 30, 2015, 11:35:01 pm »

What it means is that I, too, would be a lazy lord that delegates all actual leadership to others while I faff around all day.  The "+1" instead of an actual answer serves to make clear my true, lazy nature.
« Last Edit: October 30, 2015, 11:39:25 pm by Nunzillor »
Logged

Orange Wizard

  • Bay Watcher
  • mou ii yo
    • View Profile
    • S M U G
Re: A second question about castles.
« Reply #24 on: October 31, 2015, 04:33:40 am »

A member of the Castle Owners' Association
Logged
Please don't shitpost, it lowers the quality of discourse
Hard science is like a sword, and soft science is like fear. You can use both to equally powerful results, but even if your opponent disbelieve your stabs, they will still die.

H4zardZ1

  • Bay Watcher
  • Mostly Harmless
    • View Profile
Re: A second question about castles.
« Reply #25 on: October 31, 2015, 05:10:56 am »

1+ means "My answer is that" or "I agree with that".
Logged
Quote from: Rock
Quote from: Comrade Qwasich
Stop bullying children
I can't
I have to bully children
Sigtext and other things

AkumaKasai

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: A second question about castles.
« Reply #26 on: October 31, 2015, 09:49:06 am »

I'd be an impenetrable vault for my countless riches.
Logged

poketwo

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: A second question about castles.
« Reply #27 on: October 31, 2015, 06:53:34 pm »

....WHAT ARE YOU FUCKIN DOING PARADE!

WE NEED ROLLS MAN! RRRRROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOLLLLLS!
Logged

Harry Baldman

  • Bay Watcher
  • What do I care for your suffering?
    • View Profile
Re: A second question about castles.
« Reply #28 on: November 01, 2015, 04:38:27 pm »

You'd hardly even see me, and when you did, you'd hardly be able to tell me apart from the average castle ghost.
Logged

wipeout1024

  • Bay Watcher
  • I lie, but I tell the truth too.
    • View Profile
Re: A second question about castles.
« Reply #29 on: November 01, 2015, 08:46:15 pm »

I won't be the ruler in law, but.in all actual purposes, I might as well be, as I am the cunning mother of the ruler.
« Last Edit: November 01, 2015, 09:11:43 pm by wipeout1024 »
Logged
Ain't nobody got time for that.
Pages: 1 [2] 3